Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Updated Spark????

178K views 637 replies 112 participants last post by  Mtbmandan  
#1 ·
As Nino is now racing a 120mm travel bike, you’d think that Scott would have a lightweight version for sale soon. Has anybody heard anything?
 
#211 ·
Flow Mountain Bike have a comparison of frame weights to other manufacturers:
  • Specialized S-Works Epic EVO - 1,659g
  • Orbea Oiz OMX - 1,740g
  • Scott Spark RC HMX SL (OLD) - 1,799g
  • Specialized S-Works Epic - 1,869g
  • Scott Spark RC HMX SL (NEW) - 1,870g
  • Cannondale Scalpel Hi-Mod - 1,910g
  • Trek Supercaliber - 1,933g
  • Santa Cruz Blur 4 - 1,933g
  • Giant Anthem Advanced Pro 29 - 1,983g
  • Canyon Lux CF SLX - 1,922g
  • Merida Ninety-Six RC - 2,064g
These are claimed weights for a Medium sized frame with all hardware and rear shock.

 
#236 ·
I got a call from my US dealer this morning. He says he will get his first “allocation” next week. He says he will be told what he can get in the “first round” not just order whatever he wants. I asked for a Supersonic, World Cup, or SL in that order.
He’s been told nothing about the new Supersonic just announced. No idea if it will be a frameset like last year’s or a complete bike. As long as I can get a large frame I’ll adapt.
 
#239 · (Edited)
A bike shop in Portugal told me the ETA for the Spark is late December early January, with limited frame sizes. So, it's 5/6 months of waiting. And I'm ordering the world cup evo, plus some parts exchanged. Probably with the Silverton SL2 wheels and power meter.
Anyone has reviews on the Silverton SL2 wheels? Are they strong enough?
On the website there's no info about the SL2, they should be 30mm inner width and slightly heavier than the 26mm version?
And to finish the super clean cockpit, add a zirbel shifter with a blipbox, that should fit easily inside the frame box of the shock.
 
#241 ·
#246 ·
What's everyone's reasoning between the regular Spark and Spark RC this time? I wouldn't have considered the RC in the past, as the 100mm travel wasn't enough for my type of riding. Now it's got the same 120mm rear travel as the regular Spark.

As far as I can tell, the differences for the more trail oriented Spark mostly comes down to:

  • Fox vs RockShox suspension front and rear, 10mm additional front travel on the regular spark.
  • Wider bars (760mm vs 740mm)
  • Riser cockpit, vs negative rise
  • 4 piston brakes vs dual piston (might depend on model)
  • Schwalbe Wicked Will tyres, more trail oriented vs the Rekon Race on the RC.
  • Dropper post on most models, unlike the RC where it's only available on the RC Pro and upwards.

As I wrote, I have ordered the regular Spark 900 AXS. I don't do any XC racing, so I think I will have more fun with the Spark, but I think the RC looks much more compelling this time. From the reviews, it appears plenty capable.

Did anyone test them both?
 
#247 ·
"The other differentiating factors between the two versions are smaller, more linear rear shock for the RC cross-country bikes and slightly larger-volume, more progressive shocks for the 900 down-country bikes. "

"And while the rear shock size and stroke is the same between the two bikes, the shock's used on the Spark 900 employ a higher volume air can to improve sensitivity and comfort."
 
#248 ·
In my case... I switched from a regular Spark to a RC a couple of years ago, thinking "it's time for me to race XC", and it turned out that I didn't race that much as expected haha. So I was thinking to switch to a more trail oriented bike again. But in my humble opinion, if what it's being said in paper is true, the new Spark would be ideal for me, more robust, it will give me more confidence, and fully capable for XC racing when the time comes. WDYT?
 
#267 ·
Got some very discouraging news from my local Scott dealer yesterday. The regional rep (4 states) allocated only six bikes to him for the “first round.” All RC Sparks but all lower build levels and random sizes. He decided to pass, says he doesn’t want to have to explain to everyone asking for one why he can’t get the size they need or variation they want.
He told me to call another local dealer and he was a little more optimistic but not much. I have had eight Scott bikes since 2005 and all but one were somewhat difficult to order and obtain. I love the product but their distribution has been sketchy for 16 years now. I’m happy for you in other parts of the world who are getting bikes, the US is still no man’s land.
 
#269 ·
@mtbscott I'm following another thread in a spanish forum [Fotos] - SCOTT SPARK 2022 and things are the same there. For what I've read, it's a global issue, not just for the US or Scott.
Yeah, but in the USA Scott's have always been tough to get. When the RC SL came out in 2017 I had a hard time getting a frameset. In recent years the shop I go through has told me they no longer bring framesets to the USA. I was just in the Portes du Soleil region and Scotts were everywhere. Definitely different in Colorado.