The LHT is a far better choice for everyday commuting, it is over-built to last.

What is wrong with 26" not the end of the world... in fact it is a better choice for those small frames

 

Better is relative. A lot of people very happily commute on each of those models. Both are about the same price, have very similar components and a lot of built in versatility. Like you noted, the CC has 700 wheels, I`d guess it`s slightly lighter and probably not quite so rough and tough (though certainly not whimpy). The LHT is a true tank, but if you look at the whole bike after adding fenders, racks, lights, etc the weight and handling difference is going to be a fairly small when all is said and done. Which one makes you drool? That`s the one to get.

What is wrong with 26" not the end of the world... in fact it is a better choice for those small frames

Yeah. When the OP says "that`s easilly fixed", it sounds like a plan to swap wheel sizes. Probably possible, but it would require some surgery with a torch and a new paint job in addition to the minor geometry changes. Doesn`t sound worth it to me, but I prefer 26 inch wheels anyway.

 

cancelled - computer error, multiple post.

 

cancelled - computer error, multiple post.

 

Overbuilt to last? Meh. Both bikes are the same in terms of quality. LHT probably has a few more eyelets, the CC is going to have a bit sharper handling.

You could easily bump up to a 650b LHT with a set of brakes with a lot of vertical adjustment. 700c wheels would probably fit too, but you'd end up limiting the size of tire and fenders you could fit under the brake line.

 

I have owned and commuted on both and while they may seem similar they are actually distinctly different bikes. In my experience, the LHT is better bicycle both in general and for commuting for the following reasons:

The LHT is designed to carry weight and has thicker, stiffer tubes and lower bottom bracket that provide stability with only a slight sacrifice in weight. On the other hand, the CC felt unstable when loaded, especially in the front end.

The LHT has more relaxed geometry that is better for commuting but is still quick and responsive enough to make it fun to ride. The CC has awkward geometry that felt uncomfortable with a longer effective top-tube than the same size LHT.

The LHT comes with lots of useful brazes and has nice touches such as fancy fork and rear dropouts and extra spoke holders, while the CC doesn't even have a cable stop for the rear brake! It also comes with nicer components than a CC, with XT hubs and rear derailleur.

While I'll allow the CC is a nice bike, the only thing that it has on the LHT is the horizontal dropouts which allow single or fixed gear riding. However, this is only an advantage if you always ride SS/FG, as changing back and forth is too time consuming to be done on a regular basis.

I have since sold both bikes and am now on my third Surly machine, a Big Dummy. If your interested, I could give you another 20 reasons why a BD is better than a CC or an LHT!

 

I ride a CC fixed and LHT geared (w/ 26x2.0 big apples). They are set up pretty differently, but the LHT is better with a load (gearing aside) and is my only choice for kid-hauling. I could load the CC like I do the LHT (front and rear) but it would be more of an endurance thing than enjoyable, and I'd want to gear it differently too.

 

There are a wider (figuratively and literally) variety of tires available in the 26" size, something to consider as well.

 

If I was in the market for one of those two bikes, I'd get the Kona Jake The Snake.

 

LHT commuter here boss.

Love it. The geometry is perfect for a commute. As mentioned above, it's a bike designed to carry stuff. Why? Because it's got touring geometry and specs: low bottom bracket; longer chain stays; not exactly the same gearing as a CC. Personally, I don't think you can go wrong with either, but I choose the LHT.

 

I like mine. It's a pretty darn stable bike compared to my last cyclocross commuter especially when it's loaded. If not for commuting I can slap some fat tires( Continental Vapors rear and some 2.1 Kendas front) and do some offroad rides. The best part for me is I don't need to get off the saddle when stopped at red light because of the low bottom bracket(one of the reason why it's such a stable bike).:thumbsup:

 

I ride a Cross-Check as my main commuter and putting-around-town bike. I added a Delta rear rack to hold panniers, rack trunk, and whatever else, a Brooks saddle, and swapped the knobby 'cross tires for a pair of slick Continental Gatorskins. It's been a good workhorse for the past two years.

Depending how much of a load you're going to carry, a Cross-Check may not be your ideal. The Cross-Check doesn't have provisions for mounting a front rack and panniers; the LHT does. The Cross-Check is a road-bike/'cross bike; the LHT is optimized more for loaded touring and hauling stuff. I ride a 56 cm bike, so an LHT in my size would still have 700C wheels, but that may be an issue for others. If picking either of the two Surlys strictly for commuting & utility riding, the LHT has an avantage in that you can easily fit front racks and better distribute heavy loads.

 

Mate what sized LHT frame is that?

 

I've used both, both both commuting, touring, and utility riding. And I've liked both.

The LHT gets the nod on an all-around commuter and utility bike, simply because it's built to go the distance hauling the freight. The Cross-Check feels a little peppier, but doesn't have the braze-ons to mount front racks or panniers (supposed to be a standard addtion staring with the 2011 models), and has a little higher bottom backet and gearing.

Both have served me well, and I would have no qualms about walking out and buying another one this afternoon for the same purposes...

 

Depending on the type of roads and distance of your commute, the perceived speed gain with the 700c in the CC might be insignificant. But it's YMMV as usual.
I wonder what's the difference once you factor in the tire sidewall height b/t the LHT's 26er vs. the CC's 700c.

 

Could one put an LHT fork on a CC to get the additional brazons?

Other options for front racks to exist. Nashbar sells a little front rack that attaches to canti studs.

https://www.nashbar.com/bikes/Product_10053_10052_167593_-1_201521_10000_200411

VeloOrange has a few smaller front racks like this one that do not require mid-fork brazons:

https://www.velo-orange.com/racks.html

And Rivendell sells a few as well. My favorite is the Mark's Rack, which I own.

https://www.rivbike.com/products/show/mark-s-rack-nitto/20-108

 

Could one put an LHT fork on a CC to get the additional brazons?...

I know this post is old, but since the thread is still active and I didn't see an answer to your question...

Yes, you can put a LHT fork on a CC to get the additional braze-ons. You can also keep your CC fork and use P-clamps to mount a front rack. That's what I did to mount a Jandd Extreme front rack to my CC.

I go through phases commuting. For a few years I rode my CC and, at the time, I didn't think any other bike could be better. This past summer, I switched to my 1985 Trek 300 series. That is a great bike and fits me well. For the past couple of months, I've moved back to my 2005 Kona Caldera, my first commuting/mult-purpose bike. I'm sure I'll get back to my CC at some point.

Both the CC and LHT will make outstanding commuting bikes. You can't go wrong with either.

 

My LHT isn't a "commuter" yet, althought I put about 30 miles on it a week these days. I am running Bontrager 700x38 Inverts( and they are funtionally 40's). It rides great with my 250lb self on it! I suppose that come close to "loaded". I've ridden a couple of CC's and I'll stick with my LHT on 38's, at least till I break below 200'. In case anyone is wondering, it's wine in the bag The fenders are from VO, and the whole bike was a budget build for about $700.
hvac59

 

Hey HVAC - $700? How?

Hey There.
I've been having the CC vs. LHT discussion in my head as well. How did you end up doing an LHT for $700? I'd like to know.

Thanks!! - Bob

 

I have owned both and I did not like the LHT for urban commuting - the handling was too sluggish. The LHT did not feel happy until it was loaded. The Crosscheck can be toured on also - you do not need eyelets on the fork to mount a front rack, just use c-clamps or get an Old Man Mountain rack (a rear rack is plenty for commuting anyway). Fully loaded the Crosscheck is just fine, it just isn't quite as stable as the LHT. The only thing wrong with the Crosscheck are those rear dropouts. I didn't like the 132.5mm spacing and forward facing slots. Makes getting a mountain hub in harder and requires too much QR clamping force to keep a road hub from pulling out.

 

Riding with over 50lbs across the country? LHT

Riding with less than 20lbs across town? Cross Check

As someone who has the same dilemma a couple years ago, the debate is a simple as that. For what it's worth, I bought a CC, and I love it dearly. No regrets at all. The CC will be more fun and lively unloaded, but it can still handle a decent load without a problem. It won't be as "cadillac like" as the LHT, but it's a more fun bike overall. If the bike will spend most of its life carrying a large load, then a LHT is an obvious choice.

As a bonus, here's a pic of my Cross Check with the small front rack that was posted above:

 

Mate what sized LHT frame is that?

Sorry, mate! That is a 60.

 

Any suggestion for a brake upgrade for the CrossCheck?

 

I use Suntour XCPro on the front, and their XCPro self-energizing versions on the rear of my CC. The brakes work alright, but I admit to fooling around with three different versions(first were Pauls, then Shimano, now Suntour).

I'm thinking of getting another set of brakes now as well....:madman:

 

Tektro CR720

 

Cool with shimano ultegra dual control

 

My LHT has proven to be an ideal commuter and tourer, but also handles dirt and gravel paths quite well. I like the nimbleness of the 26" wheels, as well as the tire clearance and available options. For commuting, I prefer the more stable geometry of the LHT, as well as the additional heel and toe clearance the frame affords for mounting fenders and panniers.

FWIW, my girlfriend does the same commuting and touring on her CC (50cm). She likes it, but has toe overlap and would like a wider gear range, and plans to replace the bike at some point in the future. I wouldn't be surprised if she ends up with a disc LHT.

 

Another vote for the Cross Check. I've been commuting on mine for 6 months and love it. I wouldn't be able to compare though as I have not ridden the LHT.