Let's talk about the future of 24" fatbikes. Suspension/downhill photoshop inside
My friend and I have talked about this a few times so I wanted to throw the idea out there.
Since 650Bs and 24x4" fat tires have similar overall diameters, what would happen if you built a full suspension or downhill bike with wider fork and stays to get fat?
Pros:
-Able to fit riders better than a full suspension 26" fatty, due to normal tire diameter and therefore lower stem height
-Able to package longer travel suspension than 26" fat for the same reason
-Lower wheel/tire weight and inertia than 26" fatty
-More grip for cornering and stopping than a conventional 650B tire
-24x80 rims are now available in carbon AND tubeless
-Several different tires available now
-Adds another few inches of suspension from fatter tires
-Potentially better stability in loose conditions
-Might be able to use stock front triangle from a 650B bike, reducing development costs
Cons:
-Higher wheel/tire weight and inertia than 650B
-Higher overall bike weight than 650B
-Some people predicted tire float issues in muddy descents (Is this a real problem? I feel like it would just grip better)
-No 5" wide tire options yet available
-Might have too much grip to actually use in dry conditions
-Too awesome for the trails
Seeing as how 24" fat tires have a more conventional overall diameter than huge fat 26 or 29+, why aren't we seeing more companies explore the possibilities? There's yet to be a "serious" 24" fatbike produced as of yet, and I'm getting a little concerned that they will get pigeon-holed into a role as "kids' bikes" or "starter" fatbikes, even though they offer a great compromise in relation to other MTB and fat offerings.

My friend and I have talked about this a few times so I wanted to throw the idea out there.
Since 650Bs and 24x4" fat tires have similar overall diameters, what would happen if you built a full suspension or downhill bike with wider fork and stays to get fat?
Pros:
-Able to fit riders better than a full suspension 26" fatty, due to normal tire diameter and therefore lower stem height
-Able to package longer travel suspension than 26" fat for the same reason
-Lower wheel/tire weight and inertia than 26" fatty
-More grip for cornering and stopping than a conventional 650B tire
-24x80 rims are now available in carbon AND tubeless
-Several different tires available now
-Adds another few inches of suspension from fatter tires
-Potentially better stability in loose conditions
-Might be able to use stock front triangle from a 650B bike, reducing development costs
Cons:
-Higher wheel/tire weight and inertia than 650B
-Higher overall bike weight than 650B
-Some people predicted tire float issues in muddy descents (Is this a real problem? I feel like it would just grip better)
-No 5" wide tire options yet available
-Might have too much grip to actually use in dry conditions
-Too awesome for the trails
Seeing as how 24" fat tires have a more conventional overall diameter than huge fat 26 or 29+, why aren't we seeing more companies explore the possibilities? There's yet to be a "serious" 24" fatbike produced as of yet, and I'm getting a little concerned that they will get pigeon-holed into a role as "kids' bikes" or "starter" fatbikes, even though they offer a great compromise in relation to other MTB and fat offerings.