Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

1st "test" on the Mojo

2.1K views 9 replies 6 participants last post by  Davide  
#1 · (Edited)
Had the chance to ride my buddies Mojo for a bit this weekend. Granted it's a L and I would need a Med., but we adjusted the suspension for my weight and did some climbing on it (no descents). Figured that since the bike was too big for me, the descents would not be comparable if it was a Med. But for climbing, I was able to see how the suspension works.

Bottom line: It pedals SO easily up the hills. His bike was 4 lbs (26.9) lighter than mine however, but it's also got more travel so for it to ride that easily and efficiently up the hills was amazing to me. I also did some parking lot sprints at my house and it's firmer than my ride, although i only have a Float R (no propedal). The RP23 was set at "2". I did a really good lookover of the bike....being really anal about the cable routing, any areas of rubbing, dings, etc. For the amount of riding he does, there were NO significant scratches, dents, marks on the frame (he has nude one). I was expecting to see a bunch of scratches on the downtube from rocks and other junk and even running my bare hands on it revealed nothing....and he has about 1000+ mi. on it at least. Even the seat stay showed no marks...granted it has tape on it, but I would have expected the tape to be more heavily gouged than it was.

I've read about some chainsuck problems and he said there weren''t any issues. He's running XTR cranks and has 2 spacers on the drive side.....1 on the other which is the norm as I understand....I would be running XT's though but that wouldn't matter right?

The one thing I would have liked is the option of running full housing. Yes, I can just zip tie the cables on but it would have been nice to have the cable stops designed with that in mind. But as I said before.....I was being VERY particular about things. Rear tire clearance could have been better. The chainstays were a little more narrow than I would have liked (he was only running neve's 2.1's front/back.) 2.3's which I run would have been the max it could handle, but honestly, I would probably not go up any higher except for the occasional shuttle runs.

I was also skeptical about the BB height....Ibis says that at sag it's about 12.36 in.....13.2 before. My bike is at 13.5 and I would have preferred the same height. I didn't measure mine at sag but I would have to assume it's higher than 12.36. I clear most of the rocks on the trails I ride with occasionally pedal strikes but I know part of that is technique. I would basically have to learn to be avoid rocks better, but preferably, I would want it higher.

With all that being said, I was really looking to find PROBLEMS....things that I didn't like so I wouldn't have reasons to buy a new bike....but alas.....that didn't work :prft: JK hahha :D
If it was only a Med....I think I'd be talking to a shop right now and this thread would have been titled something like "LOOK WHAT I JUST BOUGHT!!!!!" hahhaha. I was considering buying a few other rides (motolite, and the spot were the top contenders) but after just that short demo, I'm sold on the Ibis. I currently ride a HH100 anyways so I think I have a pretty good understanding of how the moto would ride in comparison. The Spot is a little more "burly" than I think I need to have and even though it's got a a very similar suspension path to the old horst bikes, it's not going to pedal as effectively as the Ibis would. My buddy has the XCE and it doesn't climb as well as my HH does either....descends roughly the same.
 
#2 ·
I'm staring at my new mojo right now... (wipes away Homer dribble...)
It arrived in a box yesterday and is now in one piece - just waiting to dial in the suspension and maybe nip down to the shops to feed it some special upgrade parts.

It's yet to see dirt, but it's making me smile each time I walk past it in the study.
be patient, it will happen, and soon :0)
 
#3 ·
Just dirt demoed a Med. and Large Moj with a beta version of the new rubber paint for a few hours. (these version don't look rubberized at all)
Since my main focus is on figuring out sizing right now (I'm right at the cut-off for medium and 5'9" and for my style the medium is @ a centimeter too short.) Btai may, both bikes climbed wonderful with the medium really taking the edge on feeling like a cross country bike. Did I need the pro-pedal ? Absolutely for my style of big ring out of the saddle. Did I switch it off for downhill why...yes.
Would I send the shock to be pushed right off, oh yea !
Best words to describe the bike is shock absorbing as a full carbon should be but, out of saddle worth stiff rear triangle. But...it was hard to beleive on that side it was 5+ travel bike till I took it down hill. Then it changed personality and handled like a 5+ travel bike.
io words balanced.
The new coating seems to be holding up really well on these bikes.
Anyway, taking large back out to make sure that the front end handles well enough for me (had a 120mm stemm and putting 110 on it.) I'll try and do more of a x-country riders view on things later once I ride the large again. :D
 
#4 ·
ghawk said:
Just dirt demoed a Med. and Large Moj with a beta version of the new rubber paint for a few hours. (these version don't look rubberized at all)
Since my main focus is on figuring out sizing right now (I'm right at the cut-off for medium and 5'9" and for my style the medium is @ a centimeter too short.) Btai may, both bikes climbed wonderful with the medium really taking the edge on feeling like a cross country bike. Did I need the pro-pedal ? Absolutely for my style of big ring out of the saddle. Did I switch it off for downhill why...yes.
Would I send the shock to be pushed right off, oh yea !
Best words to describe the bike is shock absorbing as a full carbon should be but, out of saddle worth stiff rear triangle. But...it was hard to beleive on that side it was 5+ travel bike till I took it down hill. Then it changed personality and handled like a 5+ travel bike.
io words balanced.
The new coating seems to be holding up really well on these bikes.
Anyway, taking large back out to make sure that the front end handles well enough for me (had a 120mm stemm and putting 110 on it.) I'll try and do more of a x-country riders view on things later once I ride the large again. :D
what is beta version?
 
#5 · (Edited)
That just means an early test version on some bikes that were not for resale.
I had kind of hoped they would look rubberized and thus that much more durable (in my mind.) Like hokie sticks. But it is kind of a flat non gloss paint finish. Like I said it is an early test version I saw but absolutely no marks on em after quite a few rental uses I beleive. I really like the color anyway though.
 
#6 ·
ddraewwg said:
The one thing I would have liked is the option of running full housing. Yes, I can just zip tie the cables on but it would have been nice to have the cable stops designed with that in mind.
I am running full housing from the rear top tube stop backward, it eliminates all possible contamination, you just have to drill through the two cable stops on the chainstay that is quite easy.
ddraewwg said:
I was considering buying a few other rides (motolite, and the spot were the top contenders) but after just that short demo, I'm sold on the Ibis. The Spot is a little more "burly" than I think I need to have and even though it's got a a very similar suspension path to the old horst bikes, it's not going to pedal as effectively as the Ibis would.
I had a Spot for 3 years before I bought the Mojo, the Spot is just heavier (by about 0.8 pounds), has way slower acceleration and it is a bit of an anchor uphill, otherwise there is little difference in what one can do with the two bikes. If anything the Mojo is superior downhill with a much better behaved suspension.

Congrats in advance for the new Mojo :thumbsup:
 

Attachments

#7 ·
Drilling

Davide said:
I am running full housing from the rear top tube stop backward, it eliminates all possible contamination, you just have to drill through the two cable stops on the chainstay that is quite easy.

I had a Spot for 3 years before I bought the Mojo, the Spot is just heavier (by about 0.8 pounds), has way slower acceleration and it is a bit of an anchor uphill, otherwise there is little difference in what one can do with the two bikes. If anything the Mojo is superior downhill with a much better behaved suspension.

Congrats in advance for the new Mojo :thumbsup:
I didn't check the stops on the TT, but you only mentioned the seat stays ( you actually said chainstay...but I figure you were referring to the SS) ;) Anyways, I was worried about weather or not you could drill through the stops......I assume they're not carbon? But just normal alu stops bonded to the frame?

And I assume the TT stops are already set up for full housing since you didn't mention it earlier. What do you mean by "backward"?

BTW: UPS should be dropping off a little somethin' somethin' tomorrow. I CAN'T WAIT!!!! Friday nite is gonna be "Project Ibis" nite.....along with lots of beer. :D They're also dropping off a Spot frame for my buddy. I'll post pix. Mojo vs. Spot.....AWESOME!
 
#8 ·
I got my Mojo in the middle of April! It has about 3500 miles(6000k!) and is still going strong! I am on the third set of tires, second set of grips, and I am picking up a new drivetrain today! 07XTR is wearing out! I have changed cables 5 times, and two sets of brake pads and had to replace a spoke on each XTR wheel.. I do need a new shock though. The Fox RLC is starting to leak even though it has been overhauled 3 times! The bike has never been crashed, and it is holding up very well! It only has a few scratches from rocks jumping off the tires, and from banging it on the rocks while I climbed up a cliff in August. I have put this bike through the paces in Kananaskis on some of the most technical rocky downhills. (Cox Hill, Baldy Pass, Fording River Pass-1.5 hr dh!, to name a few) I have had absolutely NO problems with this bike. It still rides like the day I bought it even though I have over 6000k of extreme punishment on it! Amazing bike is all I can say! I have an SL on order already! I might keep the other one and make it heavier for training on! I have taken it on about 10 - 15 60mile+ trips, and the comfort level is second to none! (except maybe my 98 Ibis Bow-ti!)
 
#9 ·
ghawk said:
That just means an early test version on some bikes that were not for resale.
I had kind of hoped they would look rubberized and thus that much more durable (in my mind.) Like hokie sticks. But it is kind of a flat non gloss paint finish. Like I said it is an early test version I saw but absolutely no marks on em after quite a few rental uses I beleive.
that is what got my attention was that flat look. i had an sl on order and the more and more i thought about it i cancelled and just switch to a mojie . i figured the sl is sweet but the xtra 700 dollhairs i could buy a wheelset or something. trust me i lost a few nights sleep on this. my girlfriend says i have issues
 
#10 · (Edited)
ddraewwg said:
I didn't check the stops on the TT, but you only mentioned the seat stays ( you actually said chainstay...but I figure you were referring to the SS) ;) Anyways, I was worried about weather or not you could drill through the stops......I assume they're not carbon? But just normal alu stops bonded to the frame?

And I assume the TT stops are already set up for full housing since you didn't mention it earlier. What do you mean by "backward"?
Yes, sorry I meant "seatstay", the guides are aluminum. By backward I mean: "I run continuous from the top tube rear stop all the way (backward) to the der (see the photo). I do not run full housing on the top tube, just in the rear

Using a dremel it is nice to have a tungstene carbide cutter to make the job easier:

http://www.dremel.com/en-US/attachm...hments-and-accessories/attachment-accessory-detail.htm?H=188537&G=66240&I=66305