Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1,901 - 1,920 of 2,466 Posts
I am not seeing a whole lot of difference between a 036 and the FM06
I copied and pasted a transparent image of the FM06 on top of the 036 image.

The head angle is different on the FM06
The rear stay has no pivot on the FM 06

The frame size is a bit larger in the FM06 image but you can move the transparent FM06 image around and line up the BB and fame tubes to do a compare

 
That said, if you're considering paying $1400 on eBay for that frame, just buy a Yeti ASRc on CC/BB for $2200 and get a warranty AND a Fox DPS Factory shock.

Buying a shock for that frame puts you most of the way towards the Yeti, which this frame is clearly trying to replicate.
 
Mine was a normal BB30 with circlips... but PF30 didn't exist back then ;)
Thanks two-one,

Ever had any creaking/problems with it?

I'm.sure mine must be the same. They said BB30 when I bought it but as I was running Shimano cranks I never bothered to look to see if it had grooves for the circlips or measure the diameter of the housing to confirm.

Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
 
Ever had any creaking/problems with it?
Ehmm... i've had to replace the bearings more often than my older hollowtech cranks, but luckily they can be ordered cheaply online (its just a simple 6806-2RS bearing). BB30 sealing is always poorer than modern cups. It also depends on the preloading system. My FSA crank has a preload collar that has to be turned to reduce sideways play.
One trick is by buying aftermarket enduro seals for BB30 that creates an extra sealing layer, and mount with loads of waterproof grease.
 
Ehmm... i've had to replace the bearings more often than my older hollowtech cranks, but luckily they can be ordered cheaply online (its just a simple 6806-2RS bearing). BB30 sealing is always poorer than modern cups. It also depends on the preloading system. My FSA crank has a preload collar that has to be turned to reduce sideways play.
One trick is by buying aftermarket enduro seals for BB30 that creates an extra sealing layer, and mount with loads of waterproof grease.
Thanks for the tips.

Just ordered a BB30 power2max S-type power meter so guess I'm stuck living with it for a while. Will have to keep an eye on the bearings and maybe a spare pair on hand.
Cheers

Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
 
Custom LaMere Boost 148 Rear for HM036

We just had a Boost 148 custom carbon rear end made for the popular open mould 29er full suspension HM036 (and many other names) frames..... fits 3" tires, we beefed it up made it super stiff and burly with nicer pivot points.
 
View attachment 1104305 We just had a Boost 148 custom carbon rear end made for the popular open mould 29er full suspension HM036 (and many other names) frames..... fits 3" tires, we beefed it up made it super stiff and burly with nicer pivot points.
I like it! Looks like it will be a popular choice as 29+ gains popularity.
 
In order to accommodate 3 inch tires, I am guessing that only the lower chain stay section is what you are talking about replacing on the 036 frames?

The upper section that leads up to the shock pivot is the stock one?

Also, more detail on the nicer pivot point statement?
Different bearings?

Are you selling the lower section?

We need more detailed info please
 
Imo, the upper section looks beafier too and the flex comes from the main pivot, being quite narrow basewise. Same issue with the upper links...
I'm critical about the custom-Lamere-rear feeling stiffer?
Possibly Lamere would like to quantify how much the lateral stiffness is improved, possibly by side loading the frame and measuring the amount of deflection, then comparing that to the deflection in the stock -036.
 
1,901 - 1,920 of 2,466 Posts