Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

XTC Composite 29er Thread

91K views 172 replies 56 participants last post by  Feideaux  
#1 ·
Let's see some pics and testimonials specs of your rigs, people. Getting mine tomorrow. Will put in my $.02 when I get some mileage in.
 
#6 ·
2013 xtc composite 29er 3.

2013 xtc composite 29er 3.
Swapped out the following from stock. Stans arch wheels,fsa sl-k bars and stem. Giant connect sl composite seatpost.
shimano 540 pedals. As is 23.6 pounds. This thing is superfast and handles great. The paint finish is top notch. The only thing i think will need replacing are the stock tires. They are pretty sketchy in loose, loose/over hardpack riding. No big deal though.
 

Attachments

#7 ·
2013 xtc composite 29er 3.
Swapped out the following from stock. Stans arch wheels,fsa sl-k bars and stem. Giant connect sl composite seatpost.
shimano 540 pedals. As is 23.6 pounds. This thing is superfast and handles great. The paint finish is top notch. The only thing i think will need replacing are the stock tires. They are pretty sketchy in loose, loose/over hardpack riding. No big deal though.
Tight whip. After I get done with some of my house projects my XTC will get the same treatment!
 
#8 ·
#9 ·
^ sick bikes.

I picked up my Giant XTC Comp 1 last week. 24.58 lb stock for a medium, no pedals. Replaced a 2011 XTC 2 (alloy jawn) 3x10 drivetrain.

I can't give a great ride report yet, but will circle back. On the initial ride it felt more compact and taller than my old bike, but the steerer is uncut and the stem is setup tall, and it is equipped with risers. The bike was a rocket though: stiff and the 2x10 setup was excellent in regards to gearing. The fork's CTD lockout seems to have **** the bed however so I am sending the fork to Fox for warranty service.

I have some changes in the works:
- dt swiss 240 hubs to arch ex rims (upgraded 36t ratchet)
- conti xking 2.2 (tubeless)
- xt cassette
- xt shadow + derailleur
- pcb brakes
- easton ec70 bars
- ritchey grips
 
#15 ·
tires are a big part of any wheelset weight savings. I swapped from the stock to Stan's Arch EX + DT Swiss 240 + conti xking + tubeless and it's about the same. maybe half a pound. I think because the tires weigh 400g more than the non tubeless ready stock tires.

however, the 3 definitely has a heavier wheelset than the 1 stock. I did it mostly for tubeless
 
#20 ·
The dropper is one of the early Specialized Command Posts from '09. I must have got a lemon because it has been bulletproof since new, so this is the fourth bike to wear it.

I broke in the bike today and am somewhat disappointed by the Recon fork, which is to be expected I suppose. I weigh 180, and even at 80psi (well below the factory recommendation) it was still way too harsh over minor chunk. So now my first priority is a used Fox or Reba before a set of lighter wheels.
 
#29 ·
This bike is a full on XC race bike. Of course how you actually use it is up to you. This is heavier carbon frame than most carbon race bikes out there and I have heard it is a bit more stout because of that but I am not sure. I think any bike should be able to handle occasional small jumps. I am not a hucker but I take this off of small jumps on every ride I am weigh in the high 100's. Not sure what "XTC" means, I thought it was a play the word "ecstasy" but "XC" in the since it's an "XC" bike.
 
#36 ·
Evolution is complete - with weights

For anyone who cares, I've attached pics with corresponding weights and specs to show how various mods affected total weight.

Stock w/o pedals: 26.6lbs



Swapped OEM to Specialized Command Post, Azonic 420 pedals, Maxxis Crossmark tires: 28.6lbs (yikes!)



Swapped OEM to WTB Rocket V Pro saddle, Fox F29 FIT 100RLC fork, Stans ZTR Arch EX Stock wheelset, Formula R/RX 180/160 brakeset, Shimano XT crankset and cassette, SRAM X9 Type 2 rear derailleur: 25.8lbs (whew!)

 
#41 ·
Just leave the stock 160 rotor in the rear if you are getting a 180 for the front. Most of the braking is handled by the front anyway.

Also, will 120mm travel effect the ride? Would it also stress the headtube of the frame? I was hearing XC bikes can't handle much travel above 100mm unless I'm wrong?
120mm would slacken the head angle, making the steering slower. As for additional stress on the headtube, it's possible. Based on your other posts, it sounds like you should have gotten an All-Mountain hardtail, not a carbon XC one.