Hey,
So, like many in this forum I'm looking at the Nomad for my next bike. I currently ride a Stumpy 120. I've never felt really balanced on it and now want something slacker.
I've looked at the standard options and have pretty much narrowed it down to a few bikes:
Nomad
5 Spot
Heckler
BLT
The Spot and the Nomad are out in front
Now before I get a ton of replies saying the nomad isn't in the same category as a 5 Spot, let's take a look at the geometry numbers and my riding.
I live in the Bay Area so climbing is a fact of life, lots of it. I'm trying to get away from a pure cross country ride, open up the HA to 68 or 69, and use the bike for "agressive trail riding", lots of flow. No hucks, if I do drop it will be less than 2-3 feet, as part of a trail.
If we look at some of the key bike geometry numbers in XL (I'm a bit over 6'4"):
HA WB SA
Nomad 69 45 71
5 Spot 69 45.6 73.5
Heckler 69 44.9 71.5
BLT 69.5 44.7 72.5
I found some of these interesting...for example, you often hear that the nomad is long but according to these numbers the 5 Spot is actually longer! Actually the more I think about it the Nomad looks like a VPP Heckler. Hence my question.
Normally I'd say "I don't need a Nomad, too much bike". I rode a Nomad and a Spot, loved both of them and was leaning towards the spot but more and more I keep asking "Why not get a Nomad?"
For instance, weight wise, the Nomad and a Heckler are close. Everyone loves a heckler for agressive trail riding.
A beefy 5 Spot will get up there in weight as well. The spot is longer too.
Will a nomad let me grow further as I progress?
I suspect I can't go wrong with either ride but I'm certinaly open to comments and suggestions.
Thanks
Paul
So, like many in this forum I'm looking at the Nomad for my next bike. I currently ride a Stumpy 120. I've never felt really balanced on it and now want something slacker.
I've looked at the standard options and have pretty much narrowed it down to a few bikes:
Nomad
5 Spot
Heckler
BLT
The Spot and the Nomad are out in front
Now before I get a ton of replies saying the nomad isn't in the same category as a 5 Spot, let's take a look at the geometry numbers and my riding.
I live in the Bay Area so climbing is a fact of life, lots of it. I'm trying to get away from a pure cross country ride, open up the HA to 68 or 69, and use the bike for "agressive trail riding", lots of flow. No hucks, if I do drop it will be less than 2-3 feet, as part of a trail.
If we look at some of the key bike geometry numbers in XL (I'm a bit over 6'4"):
HA WB SA
Nomad 69 45 71
5 Spot 69 45.6 73.5
Heckler 69 44.9 71.5
BLT 69.5 44.7 72.5
I found some of these interesting...for example, you often hear that the nomad is long but according to these numbers the 5 Spot is actually longer! Actually the more I think about it the Nomad looks like a VPP Heckler. Hence my question.
Normally I'd say "I don't need a Nomad, too much bike". I rode a Nomad and a Spot, loved both of them and was leaning towards the spot but more and more I keep asking "Why not get a Nomad?"
For instance, weight wise, the Nomad and a Heckler are close. Everyone loves a heckler for agressive trail riding.
A beefy 5 Spot will get up there in weight as well. The spot is longer too.
Will a nomad let me grow further as I progress?
I suspect I can't go wrong with either ride but I'm certinaly open to comments and suggestions.
Thanks
Paul