Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Transition Sentinel v 2.0 Thread

449K views 1.5K replies 208 participants last post by  B3nnyH  
#1 ·
The redesigned Transition Sentinel is now live!

Image


Transition Sentinel 2020 Highlights

  • Full EPS molded carbon frame (front triangle, rear triangle, and rocker)
  • New, progressive suspension design
  • 148mm Boost dropout spacing
  • Stock rear travel 150mm with 62.5mm stroke shock
  • Downsize to 140mm rear travel with 57.5mm stroke shock
  • Enduro Max sealed bearings with bearing shields on main pivot
  • 44mm/56mm Press In Headset
  • Threaded bottom bracket
  • Molded rubber chainstay, seatstay & downtube protection
  • External rear brake cable routing
  • Water bottle storage inside the front triangle
  • Accessory mount on underside of toptube
  • 29-inch wheels with tire clearance up to 2.6-inches wide
  • Weight: 7.05 lbs frame with shock
Geometry

Image

How does it ride?

Image


"I've cleaned more techy climbing sections, felt more confident on blind trails, and had more fun riding the Sentinel than many previous bikes. The Sentinel's climbing characteristics may require a bit of readjustment if you're not accustomed to Transition's geometry, but once you find the sweet spot, this bike will most certainly leave you satiated as you clean more technical bits than you have on any other bike."

Read our first impressions here: https://reviews.mtbr.com/review-2020-transition-sentinel
 
#1,343 ·
First of all, if that could be misinterpreted, I really love that bike. The bike is more forgiving than you'd expect from a trail bike. Really. With the longish wheelbase, slack head angle and central riding position - plus the progressive suspension - the bike will save your ass under most circumstances. There are no overwhelming cons either. Personally, I just needed more time with the bike than with others, and I've been riding mountain bikes for 22 years (maybe this is the reason!). I really didn't want to upset anyone, but sometimes I just miss the balance when everyone who rides a bike says it's the best in the world. I've ridden a total of nine different Transitions and more or less got on with all of them straight away. None of them took me as long to try out as the Sentinel V2. I currently also ride a Spur and felt at home from the very first second. As I said, this is very subjective, but it's my experience. It's definitely forgiving, but I felt it also to be a bit sluggish if you're not actively moving it, and you might need to have the necessary skills for that. Other users seem to not have had this experience and I am not claiming to know any better. There is a review on YT ( semi-sandy), where they explain, why the sentinel didn’t turn out to be the bike they wished for. I don’t totally agree, but guess, we have the same initial thought here, while I tried to adapt to the bike instead of switching to another make and finally got to be liking it a lot. Again, sorry if I unsettled you, but I think, such possible cons should be considered before you move to a bike, the more if you do without a test ride before buying it. Since every other bike will have their cons as well: go for it.
 
#1,346 ·
Sentinel feels more agile and responsive, pedals better and is much lighter.

The Claymore was good at just plowing straight through rough terrain, but was not very nimble in comparison and was harder to pump terrain and generate speed. The rear center growth under travel made it unpredictable at times if you weren't just going straight.

The Sentinel is shorter in front/rear centers, a bit less travel, but a bit slacker HA. It is more fun more of the time and I have not found a situation where it was overwhelmed yet. No problems in rough, steep terrain (I do have a coil and cascade link on it). Due to less weight and no idler pulley setup, it pedals and climbs way better.

It's really what I was looking for from the start, a mini Spire.
 
#1,347 ·
awasome! that's good to hear.
Pulled a trigger and ordered Sentinel. It looks dope so it must ride great ;-) Thought about Claymore too. I like my Highlander but it has some big flaws. Weight, high anti-rise (suspension stiffens up a lot if you on rear brake), and relatively complicated suspension setup - I guess I'm not sold on high pivot.
Been on a coil for a while but going to try air x2 for a change.
 
#1,354 ·
It’s well behaved on both. There’s lots of reviews with positive things to say about the Sentinel’s suspension performance both up and down. I would say that it’s climbing times are not far off of my Spur on my local stuff (it probably has more to do with my level of motivation that day than the bike).

With a coil, I settled into a progressive MRP spring rather than a linear one. The ride was a little more lively, but still more forgiving than air. I’m mostly riding air anymore, but I enjoy switching back to coil occasionally.
 
#1,375 ·
Transition QC sets a very low bar, good thing the warrant support is great.
I don't know what factory they use in China for the frames, but it's not one of the good ones.... đź’©

Are you running a long post? Running as long as possible to get the max insertion in the frame helps.
These frames only cost a few grand so I understand they need cut corners to make a living ;-)

216mm BikeYoke. 3cm out of the seat tube. So quite deep. It's nuts how deep you can go in this frame
 
#1,376 ·
Posted my Smuggler in the other thread, so I thought I'd post my Sentinel over here. Started as the Carbon GX build and I've swapped a bunch of parts (drivetrain, wheels, suspension, added CC link) to make it fairly custom. Weighs just over 31# with pedals, can't wait until the snow melts!

Image
 
#1,381 · (Edited)
Just got this in the mail and getting set it up. Going to slowly put some purple accents on overtime. Put on the RideWrap Tailored Protection yesterday, that took a while! Stoked to get a ride in. My old bike in the background. Does anyone know what these 2 small pieces are for? It came with the bike box, but can't figure it out yet.

View attachment 2089254


View attachment 2089253