Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Transition Sentinel v 2.0 Thread

449K views 1.5K replies 208 participants last post by  B3nnyH  
#1 ·
The redesigned Transition Sentinel is now live!

Image


Transition Sentinel 2020 Highlights

  • Full EPS molded carbon frame (front triangle, rear triangle, and rocker)
  • New, progressive suspension design
  • 148mm Boost dropout spacing
  • Stock rear travel 150mm with 62.5mm stroke shock
  • Downsize to 140mm rear travel with 57.5mm stroke shock
  • Enduro Max sealed bearings with bearing shields on main pivot
  • 44mm/56mm Press In Headset
  • Threaded bottom bracket
  • Molded rubber chainstay, seatstay & downtube protection
  • External rear brake cable routing
  • Water bottle storage inside the front triangle
  • Accessory mount on underside of toptube
  • 29-inch wheels with tire clearance up to 2.6-inches wide
  • Weight: 7.05 lbs frame with shock
Geometry

Image

How does it ride?

Image


"I've cleaned more techy climbing sections, felt more confident on blind trails, and had more fun riding the Sentinel than many previous bikes. The Sentinel's climbing characteristics may require a bit of readjustment if you're not accustomed to Transition's geometry, but once you find the sweet spot, this bike will most certainly leave you satiated as you clean more technical bits than you have on any other bike."

Read our first impressions here: https://reviews.mtbr.com/review-2020-transition-sentinel
 
#1,062 ·
Image



Hey guys after a bit of help

I’ve just installed the bolts on the bottom of the shock, one bolt threads into the other to secure it, to 10nm….so I hold one side with a Allen key and torque wrench the other side to 10nm …. However when I’ve done it the whole complete bolt spins around In the frame? It’s torqued the bolt head in to the thread on the other side fine, but the whole complete bolt will spin freely in the frame? Doesn’t seem right to me?
 
#1,067 ·
Hi, I received sentinel frame, but seems that included crown race is wrong. I cannot fit it correctly inside of lower headset bearing. Crown race that I got doesn't match either angle of bearing or diameter.
Lower part of headset says H5068, bearing is TH MR019 1.5 36x45.

I'm seeing following races available:
FSA H6088 for NO57-6 (PN160-5551)
FSA H6078 for NO57 (PN 160-5537).

Can anyone tell which one is the right one?
 
#1,069 ·
Can anyone compare the Sentinel to a Canfield Lithium? Coming from a process 134 looking for an all arounder for chunky techy riding and occasional enduro. Have ridden the Sentinel (but not the lith) and really liked it but torn between a it and the CBF platform which is also pretty legit.
Haven’t ridden a lithium, but looking at the geo numbers it’s a bit shorter than the sentinel and a degree steeper, so it’ll probably be a bit less aggressive but maybe a better all arounder, but probably won’t plow as well as the sentinel


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#1,070 ·
Hi All,

posted this on the pinkbike forum also so im sure some may see it twice, but thought id tap in to the knowledge of both!

Just ordered a cascade link for my sentinel v2. Will probably run a coil shock and was thinking of going for a 60 stroke shock - has anyone else done that?
Looks like 62.5 stock stroke gives 165mm of travel with the 57.5 giving 155mm of travel. So a 60 stroke should give about 160mm, making it a 160/160 both ends.
Anyone doing this, any downsides?
 
#1,074 ·
So I’m looking for a new frame and the sentinel is at the top of my list along with the stumpy evo alloy. I like transition a lot more as a company though. I really want a do it all bike that has a focus on downhills. I tend to punch through rock gardens trying to hurt each rock as I go through. Popping off of roots and such is ok, but I definitely prefer the straight line method with a smooth rear suspension. Would the sentinel fit this? I previously owned the spire alloy and it’s been one of the best feeling bikes I’ve had, it was just a tad too big for my local riding. I went with a different company for my current frame and I currently regret that haha
 
#1,077 ·
So I’m looking for a new frame and the sentinel is at the top of my list along with the stumpy evo alloy. I like transition a lot more as a company though. I really want a do it all bike that has a focus on downhills. I tend to punch through rock gardens trying to hurt each rock as I go through. Popping off of roots and such is ok, but I definitely prefer the straight line method with a smooth rear suspension. Would the sentinel fit this?
IME not really. I love mine, but it’s a long travel trail bike rather than a short travel enduro bike. It’s feels lively and poppy rather than a plough. Rewards an active riding style rather than sit back and hold on. Look back through this thread at the number of people adding Cascade links and coil shock trying to turn it into what they think I should be rather than what it is.
 
#1,079 ·
Minor counterpoint. I’m a new Sentinel owner. I have owned a Spire. And two Stumpjumper Evos. And an RM Instinct for what it’s worth.

In my experience, the Sentinel IS a shorter-travel Spire. They ride very similarly. Is the Sentinel a plow bike? No, but that’s become a fairly nebulous term anyway. I agree that it’s really like a rangy incredibly capable trail bike. Definitely pedals better than the others on your list if that’s a consideration.
 
#1,080 ·
Minor counterpoint. I’m a new Sentinel owner. I have owned a Spire. And two Stumpjumper Evos. And an RM Instinct for what it’s worth.

In my experience, the Sentinel IS a shorter-travel Spire. They ride very similarly.
I’d like to hear what you think about the Sentinel v. Spire v. SJ Evo after you’ve had some time on the new bike. I just bought a Spire and an Evo in the last couple of weeks.
 
#1,081 ·
I’ll have a more nuanced view in a bit. I can tell you immediately I like the Sentinel more than those. I’m on an XL sentinel, had an XL Spire and both StEvos were S5.

The Spire was just too much bike for my needs. Too big, too mushy, too much travel. The StEvo doesn’t pedal all that well and I personally found it to be slow. The Sentinel ticks a lot of boxes for me. It really fits well. I mean really. And it turns well. It’s not particularly plush, but I’m still tuning. It is fast.
 
#1,084 ·
One thing I’m liking more and more is the versatility of the sentinel. You can go from 140mm and an air shock all the way to 165mm and a coil with a cascade link.

I’ve been running mine at 150r/160f with coil springs at both ends for the 18 months I’ve owned it so far and it’s been excellent for everything I’ve done in the UK. I'm off to the alps in the summer and with a cascade link, a new rear spring and a fork travel adjust I’ve got a 165r/170f bike to take with me that’s not too far from a spire.
 
#1,094 ·
Brutal Phoenix ride this morning. If you’re familiar with South Mountain, up Ranger across National to the east, down Geronimo, then back to car. The complete first ascent is 1.5 miles and 819 vertical feet of nasty technical climbing.

Image


View of the towers atop SoMo. I hadn’t yet lost my will to live.

Image


So, some annoyances I’d like to get input on.

Slipping seatpost. I know it’s been addressed, but searching within threads is now impossible. There seems to be a height that the post wants to be. Sadly, it’s about 15mm too low. I’ve pulled the post, cleaned, applied carbon paste and have moved the torque on the clamp up to 9nm (max is 7). What’s the fix?

Persistent rattling through chunky riding. I disassembled, cleaned/greased/locktited all pivots and torqued to spec. The entire front of the bike has been disassembled, headset greased, lowers service on the Lyrik. I assume this is cable rattle where they exit the ports. Fixes?

Thanks.
 
#1,095 ·
Brutal Phoenix ride this morning. If you’re familiar with South Mountain, up Ranger across National to the east, down Geronimo, then back to car. The complete first ascent is 1.5 miles and 819 vertical feet of nasty technical climbing.

View attachment 2023977

View of the towers atop SoMo. I hadn’t yet lost my will to live.

View attachment 2023978

So, some annoyances I’d like to get input on.

Slipping seatpost. I know it’s been addressed, but searching within threads is now impossible. There seems to be a height that the post wants to be. Sadly, it’s about 15mm too low. I’ve pulled the post, cleaned, applied carbon paste and have moved the torque on the clamp up to 9nm (max is 7). What’s the fix?

Persistent rattling through chunky riding. I disassembled, cleaned/greased/locktited all pivots and torqued to spec. The entire front of the bike has been disassembled, headset greased, lowers service on the Lyrik. I assume this is cable rattle where they exit the ports. Fixes?

Thanks.
Have you tried another shock? the noise might be the knocking sound from you SD that it’s known for
 
#1,097 ·
The seatpost is incredibly annoying. I’m particular about saddle height and it self-adjusted three times on today’s ride.

I get that noises are hard to diagnose, even in person. I did put cable foam on the seatpost cable when I had it out. The noise is a bit of a rattle/slapping sound. The brakes are Magura, so it’s not the pads. I suppose it could be the shock; I obviously don’t have a spare lying around. I’ll probably try some electrical tape on the cables at the ports to see.
 
#1,098 ·
Yeah sadly on my previous triangle I did not find a solution, like you it would go down so far then seemed happy, which was no use for my pedal height , drop transition a message I have heard they will warranty them if it continues with no fix

ah right if you’ve tried the foam thing, and the post seems solid then I’m not sure given you’ve tried and disassembled the front end, shock would be worth a check if you can source one

some times I have the sentinel absolutely deadly silent, then randomly it starts making a racket out of no where, either rattles or hollow knocks, but then a strip down or change of dropper cable foam etc usually gets It back silent again, but this loud cracking noise I’ve got just now is quite alarming so I’ll be trying to track that down next annoyingly
 
#1,100 ·
I under-torque my seatpost clamp. I don’t think I do more than 5.5 nm on my original stock collar. Going up to 9, yeesh—I’d worry about dropper function or even cracking the seat tube. We’ve got to find you a solution!

Search function, as you noted, sucks on MTBR. I have a memory of someone in this thread saying that the WolfTooth clamp in a 36.4 works great on the Sentinel. If we take that sizing advice at face value—and frankly, I’d feel a little nervous about it—their clamp design with the threaded barrel is great for evenly distributing torque. Designs where the clamp material itself is threaded create more of a single pressure point that doesn’t provide circumferential torque as evenly. If you can get confirmation that the 36.4 is compatible, I think that would be worth trying.
 
#1,101 ·
yeah dont worry about it being 36.4 transition told me this is fine - the transition one is a odd size but they confirmed the 36.4mm would be fine, just avoid the hope one, its garbage, if you google the hope one its apparent its slipped on a lot of peoples bikes over the years and general consensus is its crap!

the thomson one was better but that only requires 2.8nm to torque max, sadly this was too low for mine, it still slipped, but not as bad as the hope, i cranked it up to about 4-5nm to test and the dropper post felt bad like it was binding

i tried cleaning, carbon paste the lot

luckily i got a new front triangle and since then its been fine, so can only assume it was slightly out of tolerance or something, but i only have to torque this to 5nm (with the genuine transition clamp) and its stays put.

It was super super super annoying though so you have my sympathy
 
#1,110 ·
no way! this sucks, no wonder you have a constant loud clunk then, im sure thats what it will be, either allowing the pivot axle to move inside making the thud/rattle or just generally as its loose everything around its rattling - thats one for the future if i get a rattle/clunk i cant track down....strange one though as the pivot is inside does it suggest the hole in which the pivot axle is too wide for the actual axle? i guess it cant be much else is theres movement there? with the 5mm outer in place does it move then or does that snug it all up?
 
#1,114 ·
You definitely notice it while riding. Feels clunky and loose. Same symptoms as an untightened rear axle. I filed a warranty claim yesterday per input from customer service.

Transition‘s response has been great thus far. Not stoked about filing a claim on a new bike, particularly one that I spent five hours Ridewrapping. Halfway hoping for new hardware to test before dumping the frame. Will see what they suggest.
 
#1,115 ·
To follow up: Appears the bearings in the main link had migrated a tiny bit outward. I reset them with a punch and reassembled the bike. Haven’t ridden it yet, but it feels secure on the stand.

Regardless, Transition is sending out a new front triangle and stays. Stuff happens and it’s hard to fault the level of service I received.
 
#1,118 ·
Do you mean +1°? I’m guessing yes? Adding a longer fork and putting in a -1 would take you down to like a 62° HTA, which I just can’t see being a great way to go. Putting in a +1 and going 170 up front will put you at 170f/165r and a ~64° HTA. I’ve got a friend who did that with theirs and is really happy with it.

Keeping a normal headset, adding the CC link and going 170 up front will land you just over 63°. At that point you’ve got something really similar to a Spire.