Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
41 - 60 of 95 Posts
I have the Bontrager XR4 in a 29x2.6 on my bike, but it also comes in the 3.0, which I imagine would be even better. XR3 in 3.0 or even 2.8 would have been cool & would pair nicely with a XR4 front.
I recently picked up a new 29x3.0 XR2 for the rear and will pick up an XR4 for the front. I just need some rims wider than the 35s I have currently.
 
This bike is a perfect example of why I question most of Steve from Hardtail Party’s opinions. He supposedly designed the perfect 130 travel Hardtail and on his first ride he wanted a 140 fork and to change the seat angle. People pay this guy to tell them what bike to buy and he can’t even design his own bike right. Do your own research. Ride as many demo bikes as you can and learn what you like and what you would change before spending a lot on a Ti bike
 
For what it's worth, Steve at HP stated in one of his videos (where he was test riding a prototype frame) that the seat tube came in much steeper than he intended (79 vs ~76 degrees) so they corrected it. Prototyping doing its thing. Personally, I don't recall him preferring a 140 fork on it, but he did say it's intended for 120 up to 150 mm of travel. I won't speak for others, but if the geo of this frame weren't exactly what I was looking for, I absolutely wouldn't have pulled the trigger. I also don't always agree with Steve. I value his opinion, but like all things internet, I take it with a grain of salt. With this frame, he pretty much designed exactly what I wanted other than having more bikepacking mounts than I'd want, but that's hardly a dealbreaker. YMMV, FWIW, IMHO, etc...
 
That looks sweet. How much clearance is there left with the 2.8s? Were you able to weigh it?

I also don't always agree with Steve. I value his opinion, but like all things internet, I take it with a grain of salt.
Agreed. I used his service as I was choosing between 3-4 bikes that were hard to test ride. Other than taking a bit of time(it was early December) he steered me to a Sherpa which I really like.
 
That looks sweet. How much clearance is there left with the 2.8s? Were you able to weigh it?


Agreed. I used his service as I was choosing between 3-4 bikes that were hard to test ride. Other than taking a bit of time(it was early December) he steered me to a Sherpa which I really like.
Thanks! I haven't weighed it yet, but should be able to get it weighed this evening and will share the details. Ha! I also purchased a Sherpa after discussing with Steve. :) Fantastic bike, but I need to sell it because mine is just too small. :(

Clearance on the Maniak is good with 29x2.8s with the dropouts all the way forward. I did see a slight wear mark on the non-drive side chainstay, but it was super minimal and certainly nothing I'm concerned about. FYI, they're mounted on 35i rims and I'm probably 235 lbs with gear. However, I do question how well 3.0s will fit. The machined yoke area is contoured well for large 29s, but I think 27.5x3.0 may actually have an issue due to the shape. Similarly, there may be an issue clearing large 29s with the dropouts moved rearward. I'll try to get a photo illustrating what I'm talking about....

I just got home from a relatively short 7.5 mile shakedown over a bit of flowy XC stuff, lots of rocks/roots, and some tech (typical central TX stuff). I was super happy with the bike! The ride quality is amazing, but in all honesty I think a big part of that is likely the 29x2.8s with 18 psi in them. The geo was spot on with what I wanted and felt great. Since it's a bit over-forked (140mm) the head tube is pretty slack at (I'm estimating) 64.5 degrees. A stem that's longer than my 35mm would likely be a welcomed addition on some of the techier climbs, but it was certainly manageable and didn't feel "floppy". That being said, my plan is to put my 130mm Helm on there soon. It'll open up the cockpit and steepen the headtube just a bit. This will likely be my singlespeed hardtail and I think the shorter travel will suit it perfectly for what I want. I have a steel hardtail coming that will be intended for slightly rowdier stuff (and gears).

Attached are a couple pics and here's some details of the parts used:
140mm Pike, 29x2.8 Rekons on 35i carbon hoops, Magura Trail brakes (4 pot/2 pot), SRAM Eagle, 210mm OneUp dropper, 35mm stem, 165mm cranks, and 180/160 rotors. Any questions, feel free to ask...
Image


Image
 
Last night I weighed the bike as pictured above. ~27.8 lbs. That's close to what my Yeti ARC weighed with mostly similar components. And attached is a photo showing what I meant with regard to the chainstay clearance. As you can see, moving the tire rearward will increase the likelihood of the sidewall contacting the contour of the chainstay. This may be quite limiting with 27.5+, but I haven't checked yet.
Image


Lastly, I decided to pull off the 140mm Pike and I shortened my CC Helm down to 120mm and will try that out. It's now showing just under 65 degrees of headtube angle.
 
This bike is a perfect example of why I question most of Steve from Hardtail Party’s opinions. He supposedly designed the perfect 130 travel Hardtail and on his first ride he wanted a 140 fork and to change the seat angle. People pay this guy to tell them what bike to buy and he can’t even design his own bike right. Do your own research. Ride as many demo bikes as you can and learn what you like and what you would change before spending a lot on a Ti bike
Frankly, anyone else's findings/opinions are conjecture if they do not reflect your own experiences on a bike's geometry and dimensions.
 
This bike is a perfect example of why I question most of Steve from Hardtail Party’s opinions. He supposedly designed the perfect 130 travel Hardtail and on his first ride he wanted a 140 fork and to change the seat angle. People pay this guy to tell them what bike to buy and he can’t even design his own bike right. Do your own research. Ride as many demo bikes as you can and learn what you like and what you would change before spending a lot on a Ti bike
Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, you're making some incorrect assumptions here that I feel the need to clarify and set the record straight.

Here's how prototyping works (not all companies do this):

We send dimensions and drawings to the factory. They tell us they can build it. We pay them to make us a prototype. It arrives and isn't consistent with what we asked for. This feedback, in turn, makes it into the next model, and we prototype that before we press go on the order. This is the purpose of prototyping. Those unfamiliar with bike design and building don't understand this, many expect perfection first round.

The prototype bike was not built to my specifications regarding the seat angle. Somewhere along the line there was a communication breakdown, and the factory built the seat tube FAR too steep (at least 2* steeper than the already steep requested sta). I had nothing to do with this. Now... I know some people are skeptical and they're looking for reasons not to trust me, and I can't help that. However, doesn't the fact that I'd highlight some things I didn't love about my prototype indicate integrity rather than deception?

So many companies don't show the behind the scenes development process, including mistakes. Instead, they pay Pinkbike to become a sponsor and get their featured article in there, and then they hire a great marketing person, make a great shreddit, and sell a ton of the bikes.

I'm just a dude like most everyone else in this thread who loves bikes. I'm not a pro rider, I'm not a shredder, but I've been fortunate enough to ride a ton of amazing hardtails. I've been able to take what I've learned from my favorite ones, and improve in some areas where other companies aren't willing to go, and try to design a better bike. If that's not your cup of tea, no worries. I'm just here to spread the stoke of hardtails and try to make them better.

Stoked to see some of the completed maniaks here.

One more thing I'll say about the maniak... It's not a swiss army knife. It's not my first pick for green trails. It's not even my first pick for bikepacking, but I still bikepack on it. I understand most people don't have 5+ hardtails in their stable to pick from, so I wanted to make this as versatile as possible, without compromising its true design: to ride the types of trails I like to ride better than anything else I've found. I hope those who trusted my reviews and content enough to purchase one enjoy the bike and truly love it. I'm excited to hear more people chime in on how it rides and what they think of it.
 
I've got two maniaks right now, one singlespeed with 2.6s and a 120mm fork, and another with 2.3s with a 130mm helm. I love them both for different reasons. Sometimes I toss on 29x3.0s. I love having the options. I think for those wanting a quicker, zippier ride that rolls faster, try it out with fast rolling 2.3s, I think you'll be surprised at how quick it can be.
 
Finally got my size XXL built up the other night. I'm 6'8" 250lbs and 29x3 are the only tires I'll ride, that tire size is made for a guy my size. Been riding a Stache for a few years, but it needed a geometry update, and quite honestly even my XL Stache was too cramped. Weather has been crap here with non stop rain. Hoping it will freeze so I can get out and hit the trails, but doesn't look like that will happen over the next week.

Image

Image


Here she is sitting in my garage just after being built. Always wanted a titanium hardtail and the geo is spot on for what I was looking for. No real ride impressions other than going up and down my street a few times. I love the position I'm in. I feel centered on the bike where my weight was too far back on my Stache. Love the longer reach, manuals with no issues, feels great so far, DYING to get on some dirt. Tire clearance is tight for 29x3, but shouldn't be an issue.

I swapped all parts from my Stache, needed a new BB and headset and this bike weighed in at 30lbs 6oz. My Stache weighed 3oz more. Gonna get a new fork this summer and a new crankset when I sell my Stache frame.
 
Finally got my size XXL built up the other night. I'm 6'8" 250lbs and 29x3 are the only tires I'll ride, that tire size is made for a guy my size. Been riding a Stache for a few years, but it needed a geometry update, and quite honestly even my XL Stache was too cramped. Weather has been crap here with non stop rain. Hoping it will freeze so I can get out and hit the trails, but doesn't look like that will happen over the next week.

View attachment 2018110
View attachment 2018111

Here she is sitting in my garage just after being built. Always wanted a titanium hardtail and the geo is spot on for what I was looking for. No real ride impressions other than going up and down my street a few times. I love the position I'm in. I feel centered on the bike where my weight was too far back on my Stache. Love the longer reach, manuals with no issues, feels great so far, DYING to get on some dirt. Tire clearance is tight for 29x3, but shouldn't be an issue.

I swapped all parts from my Stache, needed a new BB and headset and this bike weighed in at 30lbs 6oz. My Stache weighed 3oz more. Gonna get a new fork this summer and a new crankset when I sell my Stache frame.

Nice.

Honestly, smaller than a 29 x 3" tire just looks wrong to me anymore. 2.5's? Great tires -- for cyclocross...

;)
 
Finally got my size XXL built up the other night. I'm 6'8" 250lbs and 29x3 are the only tires I'll ride, that tire size is made for a guy my size. Been riding a Stache for a few years, but it needed a geometry update, and quite honestly even my XL Stache was too cramped. Weather has been crap here with non stop rain. Hoping it will freeze so I can get out and hit the trails, but doesn't look like that will happen over the next week.

View attachment 2018110
View attachment 2018111

Here she is sitting in my garage just after being built. Always wanted a titanium hardtail and the geo is spot on for what I was looking for. No real ride impressions other than going up and down my street a few times. I love the position I'm in. I feel centered on the bike where my weight was too far back on my Stache. Love the longer reach, manuals with no issues, feels great so far, DYING to get on some dirt. Tire clearance is tight for 29x3, but shouldn't be an issue.

I swapped all parts from my Stache, needed a new BB and headset and this bike weighed in at 30lbs 6oz. My Stache weighed 3oz more. Gonna get a new fork this summer and a new crankset when I sell my Stache frame.
At 6' and 120 #'s following cancer, I have had zero interest in anything less than 3.0's. I find PsuedoPlus to be downright insulting as well as rubbish!

Nice.

Honestly, smaller than a 29 x 3" tire just looks wrong to me anymore. 2.5's? Great tires -- for cyclocross...

;)
Proper! Minus is just too bland.
 
Hey folks,

So when I first assembled my Maniak I opted to overfork it with a 140mm Pike. It's spec'd at 65* with a 120 fork, but the fork was new and I wanted to try it. I knew it'd be pretty slack with a 140 fork, but I was surprised to see the HTA was 62*! I expected 64* or thereabouts. In my experience, I've seen approximately a 0.5* change for every 10mm of fork travel. I was really surprised to see a delta of 3 degrees.

I then shortened my Helm MkII to 120mm and installed it. HTA was just a smidge under the expected 65*, which was expected. In my effort to always change things needlessly often due to my attention span being that of a 7 year old, I opted to try a Fox 34 at 130mm and the HTA was still super slack at ~62.5*. Axle to crown measurements for these forks aren't that different so I'm rather perplexed.

I'm just curious what forks other Maniak owners are running and what their HTAs are. Anyone care to share?

Today I'll be extending my Helm to 130mm and will also try a 1 degree angle set to steepen it a bit. We'll see how that affects the final numbers. Oh, I also converted it to single speed this week and I may end up leaving it because it's been quite fun!
 
41 - 60 of 95 Posts