First off, yes, I did an extensive forum search. Found lots and lots of conflicting information, so I thought I'd start a new query from scratch.
Me: 220# fully loaded with a day's worth of crap
The bike: 2004 Intense 5.5 set up for all-mountain, aggressive riding
The fork: 2004 Z1 FR SL
The problem: Setting up the fork. Of course. Marzocchi's recommended pressures give me an extremely non-compliant, stiff, nasty-acting fork. I believe they recommend for someone 100kg (me) to run 45+/110-. Tried it. Yuck.
So then I went with setting up the fork like I would a coil fork, by setting the sag first. I load up, put a zip tie on the fork, hop on. Naturally there's only about 2mm of sag at the 45/110 setting. So I keep backing down the pressure until I get to about, um, 25 psi. Then I have about 1/2", which still seems "high" compared to my coil forks (Z1 Dropoff and a Z150, each of which run about 1" of sag or more). But now the brake dive wants to kill me ON A PAVED STREET. There's just not nearly enough positive pressure in the fork to hold me up. Or maybe there's too much negative. So I back down the negative, to about 80ish. Feels...okay. But when I ride on it the fork feels unpredictable, dive-y, mushy, generally undersprung. Scary.
I'm looking for that sweet spot where the fork resists braking/pedaling, is plush on small-to-midsize bumps, doesn't bottom on big hits, and still gives me my full travel in the course of a typical technical ride.
Do I empty all the chambers and start first setting sag with positive pressure and NOTHING in the negative chamber? That doesn't seem right. The negative chamber will increase my sag, won't it?
Do I set, say, HALF my target static sag with the positive pressures and make up the difference with negative pressure?
And what's a good target for sag on a 130mm air fork, anyway? I feel like nothing is the same with air vs. coil, although they're just two different spring media.
Or...do I ignore all considerations of "sag" and go strictly by M's pressure chart? I have no idea what the Italians were smoking/drinking/eating/sniffing when they came up with that chart but it has no bearing on reality.
p.
Me: 220# fully loaded with a day's worth of crap
The bike: 2004 Intense 5.5 set up for all-mountain, aggressive riding
The fork: 2004 Z1 FR SL
The problem: Setting up the fork. Of course. Marzocchi's recommended pressures give me an extremely non-compliant, stiff, nasty-acting fork. I believe they recommend for someone 100kg (me) to run 45+/110-. Tried it. Yuck.
So then I went with setting up the fork like I would a coil fork, by setting the sag first. I load up, put a zip tie on the fork, hop on. Naturally there's only about 2mm of sag at the 45/110 setting. So I keep backing down the pressure until I get to about, um, 25 psi. Then I have about 1/2", which still seems "high" compared to my coil forks (Z1 Dropoff and a Z150, each of which run about 1" of sag or more). But now the brake dive wants to kill me ON A PAVED STREET. There's just not nearly enough positive pressure in the fork to hold me up. Or maybe there's too much negative. So I back down the negative, to about 80ish. Feels...okay. But when I ride on it the fork feels unpredictable, dive-y, mushy, generally undersprung. Scary.
I'm looking for that sweet spot where the fork resists braking/pedaling, is plush on small-to-midsize bumps, doesn't bottom on big hits, and still gives me my full travel in the course of a typical technical ride.
Do I empty all the chambers and start first setting sag with positive pressure and NOTHING in the negative chamber? That doesn't seem right. The negative chamber will increase my sag, won't it?
Do I set, say, HALF my target static sag with the positive pressures and make up the difference with negative pressure?
And what's a good target for sag on a 130mm air fork, anyway? I feel like nothing is the same with air vs. coil, although they're just two different spring media.
Or...do I ignore all considerations of "sag" and go strictly by M's pressure chart? I have no idea what the Italians were smoking/drinking/eating/sniffing when they came up with that chart but it has no bearing on reality.
p.