Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Pivot Shuttle SL vs. Trek Fuel EXe

29K views 52 replies 26 participants last post by  pwd81  
#1 · (Edited)
I'm interested in one of these new mid-power lightweight e-mtbs, and the Pivot Shuttle SL and Trek Fuel EXe are at the top of my list. I haven't ridden either one, so I've been doing a comparison based on specs. For reference, my current trail bike is a Pivot Trail 429.

Travel - the Pivot has 132mm travel vs. the Trek's 140mm. This is only 8mm difference, but for the type of riding I'd do on this bike I think 140-150mm is the sweet spot. My trail bike is 120mm and I definitely want more travel on an ebike. So the Trek has the advantage here.

Power and battery capacity - The Pivot has the advantage here. It has 60nm torque vs. the Trek's 50nm, and it has a 430 Wh battery vs. the Trek's 360 Wh.

Removable battery - The Trek's battery is easily removable, and the Pivot's battery is not meant to be removed. I like the option to remove the battery. I might want to remove it for a lift-assisted bike park day, and there could be certain epic rides where might want to have a spare battery.

Motor sound - The ride reports on the Trek is that the TQ motor is nearly silent. I've heard the Fazua motors are also very quiet, but I don't know how they compare.

Geometry - Geometries are very similar, and I think either one would be fine for me. The Pivot's chainstays are a little shorter, which I prefer, but it has a very long reach. My medium Trail 429 has a 460mm reach, which is already a bit stretched out for me (I put a shorter stem on it). The Shuttle SL has an even longer 469mm reach, which might be a little too long, but I don't think I want to go down to a size small. The Trek has a reach of 455mm, which I think will fit me better.

Display and controls - I give the edge to the Trek. The top tube display gives more info, and the controller design looks like it would be easier to use.

Looks - Both are stealthy and don't look like e-bikes. This is especially true of the Pivot, which really looks just like a Trail 429 or Switchblade until you look really closely. I like both the yellow and the blue colors on the Trek, and I think the Pivot colors are both pretty ugly.

Value - The Trek looks like a better value, but there aren't identical builds to compare. Looking at the Trek 9.8 XT and the Pivot Pro X01, the Pivot costs $800 more. It comes with Fox Factory suspension and Fox Transfer dropper vs. the Trek's Rockshox Select+ suspension and Bontrager dropper, so I like the Pivot's suspension and dropper spec better. But the Trek comes with carbon rims and carbon cranks. I have the similar Pro X01 build on my Trail 429, and I have 12-speed XT on my hardtail. Both work great, and each has its pros and cons. I prefer the features and ergonomics of the Shimano shifter and the better gear steps on the cassette, and the Shimano seems to shift slightly better under load. But the X01 stuff works really great too. They are both spec'd with XT brakes, which is great. (My Trail 429 came with SRAM G2 brakes, and I prefer Shimano brakes.)

Superboost - The Pivot uses Superboost 157 rear hub spacing. This was a bit of turn-off when I bought my Trail 429 since I already had some nice carbon Boost 148 wheels, but now I have an alloy and a carbon set of wheels for the Pivot, so it's not as big a deal anymore.

I think it will come down to which one I can get the best deal on, and maybe availability. I'm a NICA coach, and Trek gives a NICA discount on e-bikes for Level 3 coaches. They only list the Rail and e-Caliber, but hopefully the discount applies to the new Fuel EXe as well.

Any other opinions on these? Have any of you ridden them?
 
#41 ·
That new Scott is interesting but damn how many things do you have to use your thumb for? I will say that the tolerances between those like Pivot and larger brands is the tolerance level allowed, and you also have to consider the entry point at equal builds. Yes you can get the xyz for $ but they are alloy, not a big deal for some, or super low level, see the "entry" Levo carbon for reference. In the end we are all in the same park just on different fields, at least at times.
 
#42 ·
I like these new lighter e-bikes, and I'm really enjoying my Fuel EXe, but the new Orbea Wild looks really sweet -- full power, 750 WH battery, 160mm travel, and around 46 lbs.
The Fuel EXe has plenty of power for me (I almost never use the full boost mode), but I do sometimes wish for longer range.
 
#47 ·
The Fuel EXe has plenty of power for me (I almost never use the full boost mode), but I do sometimes wish for longer range.
Well I have good news for you! Your fuel EXe with a full second battery is still a good bit lighter than that Orbea Wild.
Fuel with a second battery is 45lbs and 720wh combined. For me (190lbs), that'll get 7,000'+ vert using trail/boost modes. That's with the Zeb, mullet and DD Minions.
My mind was blown when i removed the TQ battery and threw it in my smaller Osprey hydration pack, just to see how it felt. The battery easily fits inside the pack, which uses a 2.5L bladder. The weight of the battery is equivalent to 1.8l of water, and the battery is also pretty compact. It seems like a no-brainer compared to the WB range extender, which is nearly the same cost, less power, and leaves you with no place to store water.

Don't get me wrong, the Wild looks awesome for a full-power Enduro eBike. Different category maybe.
 
#44 ·
More range is always better if you're using a full power eBike to do long exploratory rides with loads of climbing.

If I could get the Orbea Wild with 750wH battery and still be at only 48 lbs, I'd count that as a win. I think my (wife's) Turbo Levo Comp with 700wH battery weighs in closer to 51 lbs..
 
#48 ·
Had a year and a half on a levo SL then got a Trek EXE. My comparison:
Power - virtually the same but the trek is more natural in delivery, especially noticable when hitting the 20 mph cutoff. The trek not nearly as jarring as with the SL which I had remedied with a Levociraptor tuning chip. The range doesn't seem as good on the Trek though, maybe 20% less approx and the extender no where in sight yet.
Handling - the trek is hands down quicker, more nimble, probably due to the shorter chainstays but I'm not a geometry scientist.
Noise - everything being said about the quiet Trek EXE tq motor is true. It's barely audible. The Spec? Whiny and loud enough for me to hear even with earbuds. I ride anywhere MTBs are allowed (within reason) so stealthyness is a plus. I don't know why Trek didn't provide the ability to turn off the display like Specialized does but bet that's forthcoming.
Ymmv, happy trails
 
#49 ·
Had a year and a half on a levo SL then got a Trek EXE. My comparison:
Power - virtually the same but the trek is more natural in delivery, especially noticable when hitting the 20 mph cutoff. The trek not nearly as jarring as with the SL which I had remedied with a Levociraptor tuning chip. The range doesn't seem as good on the Trek though, maybe 20% less approx and the extender no where in sight yet.
Handling - the trek is hands down quicker, more nimble, probably due to the shorter chainstays but I'm not a geometry scientist.
Noise - everything being said about the quiet Trek EXE tq motor is true. It's barely audible. The Spec? Whiny and loud enough for me to hear even with earbuds. I ride anywhere MTBs are allowed (within reason) so stealthyness is a plus. I don't know why Trek didn't provide the ability to turn off the display like Specialized does but bet that's forthcoming.
Ymmv, happy trails
I agree about the EXe handling. There is no front end wandering on steep climbs, but it's still very stable and confident on fast downhills. Cornering is great. It's just very balanced, and I don't have to think about pressuring the front tire like on some other modern geometry bikes. When I do push too hard in a corner, the rear tire tends to lose grip first, even with the same SE5 tires front and rear. The rear just drifts a little, which is easy to correct, and it raises confidence. The one tradeoff is that the bottom bracket is very low so I tend to get more pedal strikes on this bike, even with the 165mm cranks.
 
#50 ·
Came from a Rail to the Exe. Everything above is what I experienced too. I love the very natural power. It feels like me on a really good day (I mostly ride in low though). I wanted a more playful trailbike and it delivers.I shifted the Minolink to the high spot and reduced pedal strikes, but I did the same thing on the Rail. Way more bottom bracket clearance and it lifts and handles most like a regular bike for me. Range is very good for me on low. I can easily be out in the woods for over two hours without worry, but if I did run out, and sometime I do it anyway, you can pedal this with no battery power. One last thing. No rattles, instant engagement up front and no clicks, just like my Onyx. And other than the screen that won't shut off, no one knows you are on an e-bike. The screen is anoying for night rides, lot of glare.
 
#51 ·
I’ve had my Pivot Shuttle SL for about 2 weeks now. My only encounter with the Trek EXe was in the store. It was cool, but it didn’t speak to me like the Pivot. 3 rides, each about 20 miles each with ending battery at 30-50% depending on the amount of climbing. It is insanely fun and luckily haven’t had issues with the Fazua system yet , though there are some (ring controller, battery drain, deep sleep). The 60 nm motor is plenty powerful for me at 180 lb riding weight. I have more than enough battery capacity though I hear an extender will be available at some point. My build is 43.5 lbs with a coil shock, pedals, and cushcore in a Large (Pro build).

It suits my intended purpose perfectly. More laps, more confidence to explore trail systems while riding alone, and being able to free up the rest of my fun days to do other activities I enjoy. I can keep up with my full power friends and dial it back with my pedal friends. I can see this bike giving me endless grins while making my other bike very jealous.