Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
21 - 40 of 53 Posts
Of all the full-powered ones, the Pivot Shuttle was the most nimble and best pedaling. It was also the lightest. I could not live with the others but several have changed in the past 2-3 years. One other thing- if the motor or battery ever dies, can you pedal out several miles and a thousand ft of climbing? With the Levo SL, I can.
 
I totally agree with Flyer. Full fats have their place. I currently own a Trek Rail and it's pretty nimble for a 50lbs bike, but when it comes to trail riding and flickability, the lightweight bikes are tough to beat. I had a Levo SL (sold to a roadie friend) and I still have access to it from time to time. I rode it the other day and was amazed how much more lively the bike is in the twisty stuff. I'm supposed to be getting one of the new Pivot SL's as soon as they are available. On paper at least, it's the perfect bike for me. More trail oriented, at or slightly under 40lbs and 60nm is more than enough power for me. I rarely, if ever, turbo out my Rail.

SM
 
I currently ride a Giant Trance with 80nM torque that I rarely go above assist 3 out of 5 on. I've been considering one of these lighter bikes and finally got a chance to try both the Trek Fuel exe and the Pivot Shuttle SL a couple weeks ago. Both rides were taken in the neighborhoods around the bike shops where I could get the feel of the motor assist on some long hills.

I found the Fuel felt comfortable and fun to ride on all assist levels, even turned off wasn't bad. I didn't feel like I NEEDED more power to get up the hills and it felt much more nimble than my Trance which is around 14 pounds heavier. The noise level was imperceptible to me.

Even though the Shuttle has a slightly more powerful motor on paper when I rode that I felt like it didn't quite have enough oomph for me, and I found myself more consistently putting it in assist 3 and wishing it had more. Even using the turbo mode felt like I wanted more and I found myself hitting it again to keep it going after the 15 seconds was up. The toggle control felt clumsy to me as well. The noise level of the motor wasn't bad but I could hear it. The really distracting sound to me came from the hub when coasting which was more high pitched than the typical hub noises from every other bike I've ridden.

So, for me I've ruled out the Pivot, and also the Turbo Levo SL I tried a year ago that felt too weak. The Trek has impressed me enough that I'm still strongly considering it and plan to give it another look when I get a chance.
 
I currently ride a Giant Trance with 80nM torque that I rarely go above assist 3 out of 5 on. I've been considering one of these lighter bikes and finally got a chance to try both the Trek Fuel exe and the Pivot Shuttle SL a couple weeks ago. Both rides were taken in the neighborhoods around the bike shops where I could get the feel of the motor assist on some long hills.

I found the Fuel felt comfortable and fun to ride on all assist levels, even turned off wasn't bad. I didn't feel like I NEEDED more power to get up the hills and it felt much more nimble than my Trance which is around 14 pounds heavier. The noise level was imperceptible to me.

Even though the Shuttle has a slightly more powerful motor on paper when I rode that I felt like it didn't quite have enough oomph for me, and I found myself more consistently putting it in assist 3 and wishing it had more. Even using the turbo mode felt like I wanted more and I found myself hitting it again to keep it going after the 15 seconds was up. The toggle control felt clumsy to me as well. The noise level of the motor wasn't bad but I could hear it. The really distracting sound to me came from the hub when coasting which was more high pitched than the typical hub noises from every other bike I've ridden.

So, for me I've ruled out the Pivot, and also the Turbo Levo SL I tried a year ago that felt too weak. The Trek has impressed me enough that I'm still strongly considering it and plan to give it another look when I get a chance.
Thanks for the comparison. Good info. I wonder why the Pivot felt down on power despite the (claimed?) higher torque spec?
 
Thanks for the comparison. Good info. I wonder why the Pivot felt down on power despite the (claimed?) higher torque spec?
I demoed the Trek in the parking lot and ended up buying the Pivot Shuttle SL. Without riding them back to back, I could not comment on the power difference. My Shuttle has about 150 miles and power-wise it's more than enough. River mode (blue) is where I spend a lot of my time. Rocket mode is fun on wide-open trails for getting from point A to B as fast as possible.
 
I demoed the Trek in the parking lot and ended up buying the Pivot Shuttle SL. Without riding them back to back, I could not comment on the power difference. My Shuttle has about 150 miles and power-wise it's more than enough. River mode (blue) is where I spend a lot of my time. Rocket mode is fun on wide-open trails for getting from point A to B as fast as possible.
Good to know. Any other comments on the overall Pivot Shuttle SL experience so far? Rocket mode is also good for those super steep, you'd-be-pushing-without-an-ebike short climbing sections.
 
Good to know. Any other comments on the overall Pivot Shuttle SL experience so far? Rocket mode is also good for those super steep, you'd-be-pushing-without-an-ebike short climbing sections.
It truly rides like a cross between the Trail 429 and Switchblade. The motor and overall bike are very quiet.

Yesterday, I declined a steep section of the trail and turned around, and went back up for fun. :) River mode was perfectly fine!
 
It truly rides like a cross between the Trail 429 and Switchblade. The motor and overall bike are very quiet.

Yesterday, I declined a steep section of the trail and turned around, and went back up for fun. :) River mode was perfectly fine!
Rock it, River, pebble, stone is way to confusing and unnecessary on Pivot’s part. How about staying uniform Eco, Trail, Boost then we’ll all know what mode you’re speaking about without opening the manual that we don’t have. I’m not knocking you or anyone else, I just see no reason for bike manufacturers need to rewrite something that doesn’t need to be rewritten. Keep the reviews coming, because they are far and few on the Pivot.
 
Rock it, River, pebble, stone is way to confusing and unnecessary on Pivot’s part. How about staying uniform Eco, Trail, Boost then we’ll all know what mode you’re speaking about without opening the manual that we don’t have. I’m not knocking you or anyone else, I just see no reason for bike manufacturers need to rewrite something that doesn’t need to be rewritten. Keep the reviews coming, because they are far and few on the Pivot.
Right on! Otherwise, I'm proposing wind, water & fire.
 
I don't get a 132mm travel e-bike unless you are someone that is missing a leg or something and just wants to ride lighter trails but will never be able to really pedal easy trails.

I know some people shred big terrain on a small bike, but that's not the right tool for big terrain.

For an average to above average MTBer, the point of these mid power e-bikes is to have a super shreddy big bike for serious chunk but feel like you are riding a XC race bike when climbing back up.
 
Discussion starter · #32 ·
My regular trail bike is a Pivot Trail 429. I like it a lot, and the Shuttle SL looks very appealing to me. However, I ended up getting the Fuel EXe. I think the design of the control and display is better, and the motor is quieter. The Pivot has a bit more power and bigger battery, but the Trek has plenty of assist for me and the overall range is pretty similar between the two. I also felt that I wanted at least 140mm travel, although there isn't that much difference between 132mm and 140mm. The medium Trek also fits me perfectly, where the Pivot's reach is a little too long.

The Trek also looks like a better deal for the price. The 9.8XT has a full XT drivetrain and brakes (no substituting an SLX cassette and chain like a lot of brands do), plus it comes with carbon rims and carbon cranks, for $8700. It looks like the Pivot Ride build is now $9K, and that is all SLX except for an XT derailleur, and it has alloy bars, rims, and cranks. I was also able to get a 25% discount on the Trek as a NICA Level 3 coach, so that made it an easy choice for me.
 
My regular trail bike is a Pivot Trail 429. I like it a lot, and the Shuttle SL looks very appealing to me. However, I ended up getting the Fuel EXe. I think the design of the control and display is better, and the motor is quieter. The Pivot has a bit more power and bigger battery, but the Trek has plenty of assist for me and the overall range is pretty similar between the two. I also felt that I wanted at least 140mm travel, although there isn't that much difference between 132mm and 140mm. The medium Trek also fits me perfectly, where the Pivot's reach is a little too long.

The Trek also looks like a better deal for the price. The 9.8XT has a full XT drivetrain and brakes (no substituting an SLX cassette and chain like a lot of brands do), plus it comes with carbon rims and carbon cranks, for $8700. It looks like the Pivot Ride build is now $9K, and that is all SLX except for an XT derailleur, and it has alloy bars, rims, and cranks. I was also able to get a 25% discount on the Trek as a NICA Level 3 coach, so that made it an easy choice for me.
That choice makes sense, and is the way I'd be leaning as well, if I were in the market for this genre of eBike. Have you posted your ride impressions somewhere? Love to hear what you think.
 
Discussion starter · #34 ·
That choice makes sense, and is the way I'd be leaning as well, if I were in the market for this genre of eBike. Have you posted your ride impressions somewhere? Love to hear what you think.
In the Trek forum there is a thread for the Fuel EXe with some ride impressions. My initial impressions are in post #88 there. Overall I'm enjoying the bike a lot.
 
I don't get a 132mm travel e-bike unless you are someone that is missing a leg or something and just wants to ride lighter trails but will never be able to really pedal easy trails.

I know some people shred big terrain on a small bike, but that's not the right tool for big terrain.

For an average to above average MTBer, the point of these mid power e-bikes is to have a super shreddy big bike for serious chunk but feel like you are riding a XC race bike when climbing back up.
I pedal all over Colorado on a 135mm for a decade (that was considered long for a29er when I bought it). Nothing wrong with 132 if the suspension is designed right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Warranty issues and problems with the bike/manufacture and how we have to handle them is a big deal to me. Also how the manufacture handles customers and or bike shop issues or problems?
How easy and cost of replacement or upgrade parts?
My local Trek shop is run by aholes and idiots!
 
The other big thing is build standards and quality control. My Trek had a few manufacturing problems some Trek HQ fixed.
My 2021/2 PIVOT Trail 429 seems to be much better in all areas, not a single dislike or failure. So far the Pivot seems to be in a different and higher quality tier than most as far as standards Pivot holds.
 
Suspension wise my Trek 140mm of rear travel was harsher and I did not like the ride feel.
My 120mm rear travel Pivot feels far better in every way, and somehow feels like there is more than the 140 Trek.
 
To be fair the Trek was a DPS shock and my Pivot Trail 429 enduro has a FOX Float X. So how much of the superior performance and feel is the shock and or frame quality, suspension design, geo, etc I am not 100% sure.
 
21 - 40 of 53 Posts