Well, I've been trying to find a hardtail mountain bike in the 500-600 range, and I've been going around to the different LBSs in town checking out what they have. What this has shown me, rather than which bike I should buy, is that I have absolutely no idea whatsoever when it comes to choosing a bike. So, instead of asking what I should get, I'm going to ask how I should choose. Going by feel isn't working for me, everything pretty much feels the same (aside from size.)
1. Which components are the most important when making a decision? I've been mostly comparing drivetrain components, but that's mostly because I don't really know how to compare frames, shocks, and things like hubs (there's no easy shimano/sram-like hierarchy to remember.) How does one compare frames and shocks, aside from simply looking at features?
2. Does brand matter, and by how much? It seems like one gets better components or features for the price by going with less famous brands like Raleigh, Iron Horse, Jamis, etc. than say Trek or Specialized. Are they just charging less for their name, or are there more subtle differences that make up the cost? (better materials/workmanship overall, better designed geometries, etc.) I can choose from pretty much everything locally except Iron Horse and Cannondale.
3. At what level is component quality decent? I know that shimano makes stuff all the way from excellent high-end stuff to walmart trash, but I don't know at which level their stuff becomes usable (I'm particularly curious about the acera/alivio/deore range.) How about sram? Is anything suntour makes decent?
4. How is ordering online? LBS support is a non-issue to me - I'm moving away from this location in a couple of months so free tune-ups and such are pretty much useless. On the other hand, I rather doubt I could assemble a bike from parts and have it be safe and reliable. How much skill does it take to assemble one ordered from an online retailer? Are they sold partly assembled, like people ship their own bikes, or as just a pile of parts?
5. At what price point is the 'sweet spot'? I know that with many things, there's usually a point at which you get past the trash and into stuff that's actually worth using, and another point where more money stops helping too much anymore. At what level do mountain bikes start that are actually intended to be used on trails, not just the occasional dirt road? I suppose I could wait for a larger budget if $600 is just throwing money away.
1. Which components are the most important when making a decision? I've been mostly comparing drivetrain components, but that's mostly because I don't really know how to compare frames, shocks, and things like hubs (there's no easy shimano/sram-like hierarchy to remember.) How does one compare frames and shocks, aside from simply looking at features?
2. Does brand matter, and by how much? It seems like one gets better components or features for the price by going with less famous brands like Raleigh, Iron Horse, Jamis, etc. than say Trek or Specialized. Are they just charging less for their name, or are there more subtle differences that make up the cost? (better materials/workmanship overall, better designed geometries, etc.) I can choose from pretty much everything locally except Iron Horse and Cannondale.
3. At what level is component quality decent? I know that shimano makes stuff all the way from excellent high-end stuff to walmart trash, but I don't know at which level their stuff becomes usable (I'm particularly curious about the acera/alivio/deore range.) How about sram? Is anything suntour makes decent?
4. How is ordering online? LBS support is a non-issue to me - I'm moving away from this location in a couple of months so free tune-ups and such are pretty much useless. On the other hand, I rather doubt I could assemble a bike from parts and have it be safe and reliable. How much skill does it take to assemble one ordered from an online retailer? Are they sold partly assembled, like people ship their own bikes, or as just a pile of parts?
5. At what price point is the 'sweet spot'? I know that with many things, there's usually a point at which you get past the trash and into stuff that's actually worth using, and another point where more money stops helping too much anymore. At what level do mountain bikes start that are actually intended to be used on trails, not just the occasional dirt road? I suppose I could wait for a larger budget if $600 is just throwing money away.