A year ago (or even 6 months) I scoffed at the idea of dropper posts. 'it can't make that much of a difference, I ride/corner just fine since I've been doing this since I was 4, one more mechanical thing that costs money and will break.....etc'
Now I'm not sure I could live without it.
I don't have gps data points to show for it, but I'm 100% sure I'm significantly faster with the dropper on every descent. And maybe more importantly it just makes biking more fun/enjoyable.
But for true endurance racing, is it really worth the weight penalty, or do you swap back out to the lighter version?
Normal thomson is 275 grams
Dropper thomson is 570 grams
so 295 gram difference, or 0.65lbs.
A little more than a half pound isn't a lot....but for 120 miles it can add up.
Bike is Trek Superfly SS, Stans Arch rims....so pretty light to begin with. and I definitely race to be competitive/win.
Thoughts either way?
Now I'm not sure I could live without it.
I don't have gps data points to show for it, but I'm 100% sure I'm significantly faster with the dropper on every descent. And maybe more importantly it just makes biking more fun/enjoyable.
But for true endurance racing, is it really worth the weight penalty, or do you swap back out to the lighter version?
Normal thomson is 275 grams
Dropper thomson is 570 grams
so 295 gram difference, or 0.65lbs.
A little more than a half pound isn't a lot....but for 120 miles it can add up.
Bike is Trek Superfly SS, Stans Arch rims....so pretty light to begin with. and I definitely race to be competitive/win.
Thoughts either way?