Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

Ketut

· Registered
Joined
·
44 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
What is the difference between cross country and back country in term of mountain biking? May be it is clear of day for most of you, but I'm a total noob and English is not my mother tongue, so can anybody explain, please?

Thanks a lot....
 
I thought back country was a different way to say all mountain. So more rocks, roots, small drops.
 
Back country riding, you can get lost, you can have mechanical breakdowns, if you can't fix it you start walking and hope someone comes up the road.

If not you are going to be a day or so without food.

Cross Country, you go around a nice trail a couple or three times in 2 hours. Have a beer and drive home.

If you get lost follow the tape to the parking lot.

If you have a mechanical, fix or walk it out, to bad you get to cry while eating and drinking.
 
Back country is a marketing term used at present by Bionicon in effort to portray their off-road abilitties.

As a general rule, cross country (XC) is a accepted bicycle designition (such as downhill, freeride, etc.) whereas backcountry is not.
 
Discussion starter · #10 ·
OK, thanks guys, some of your answers really made me LOL :D
So I can say that back country is "tougher" or "harder" than cross country? And that is the justification of the $$$ difference between Kona Four and Kona Dawg, I guess? ;)
 
Backcountry, in snow sports, is generally anything that is not lift accessible. You're on your own, and have to be self-sufficient. You've gotta hike, posthole it, snowshoe, or use approach skis to get to the peak before you can ski or snowboard down. Big distinction from cross-country as that term relates to snow sports. Bionicon's use of "backcountry" in their materials comes from the company founders' and owners' history.... they're all former professional freeride snowboarders who were accustomed to hiking the backcountry peaks to snowboard down them. Same with their bikes, they don't have lift-accessible trails in their area in the Bavarian alps. So while it may just a "marketing" label, there's also a philosophy behind the designation that comes from their roots.
 
Indoneisan back country sounds sweet.

Ketut said:
OK, thanks guys, some of your answers really made me LOL :D
So I can say that back country is "tougher" or "harder" than cross country? And that is the justification of the $$$ difference between Kona Four and Kona Dawg, I guess? ;)
You've got the right idea. :thumbsup:
 
Right Idea, but...

In the Kona line, the "XC" bikes are more race oriented than the "Backcountry" bikes. Their XC Hardtails are all racing machines and the Backcountry Hardtails are "just" good, solid bikes. On the dually side, XC Race are the lightest, most suited for racing bikes. The XC Dual Suspension are similar, but a little heavier and have a little more travel. The Backcountry Dual have an additional inch of suspension travel and are built a little heavier.

Check the specs--the Dawg is a Deore/XT mix with hydraulic brakes. The Four is a Deore bike with mechanical disks. This is the big reason for the price difference.

Kona's are awesome. I'm riding a Kula Primo.

Rick
 
XC bikes are meant for racers. Racers who race on nicely groomed trails with no major obstacles like rocks, roots, jumps, and logs. They are designed to be light, light, light. They sacrifice durability for this lightness. Now, don't get me wrong, they are perfect for their intended application and it's not like someone can't do some all mountain (back country) riding and have the bike come through okay. But why would it come through alright? Because that rider knows how to pick very smooth lines, knows when not to push the limits of the design and walk, etc. What they don't hold up to though are the mistakes - that bad landing, that rock hit at the wrong angle, etc. Yea, it'll hold up for a little while but not for long.

All Mountain is another term for a do-it-all bike. It's not the lightest but it is durable and usually has a nice durable parts selection. There will be frame gusset reinforcements. The wheels will be heavier and stronger. You can hit small jumps and gaps. You can land off kilter and not have to worry (except for yourself if you fall LOL). It is just a good all around bike that will last through mistakes and provide, and this is key I think, YEARS of enjoyment having made all those mistakes. It is important I think to note that a good solid and reliable bike like this is generally not going to cost a bunch either. They can but that is usually because the parts build is high end line product. XTR. SRAM X.0 builds or the like. This gets the all mountain bike as light as possible although it still won't be a dedicated XC bike with regards to weight.
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts