I am trying to find a short-travel 29er and the Element and Spur are at the top of my list. Shocking I know. I had an all day demo on a size L Spur X01 last weekend and loved it. It felt great. Climbing was fast, pedal bob was minimal, descending was so fun. I was able to bottom out the rear shock, but it didn't feel like a hard bump. I rode a size L Element C30 around my LBS last night and it was totally different than I expected. The pedal bob was terrible and it felt really cramped when seated. I know that an X01 to a C30 isn't a fair comparison, but there are no Elements above C30 available anywhere I can find.
I didn't have a chance to adjust the saddle as much as I would have liked, but it felt so different than the Spur despite the geometry seeming to be almost identical. If I had been able to raise the saddle and slide it back on the rails it would have fit somewhat better, but I still don't think it would have felt as good as the Spur. Has anyone who has ridden both noticed anything like this? Looking at the charts I can't see why this would be the case. Does .6* of seat tube angle really make that much difference? Maybe the listed geometry is wrong on one or both of them.
With regard to the suspension in the fully open and trail positions the bounce in the bike when pedaling what serious. The shock on the C30 doesn't have the sag marks on it, but I think it was set too soft. The fork was also really soft. Pinkbike says the Element climbs like a rocket, but it didn't feel like that would be the case for the bike I rode last night. I really want to like the Element and chalk this all up to bad setup, but other than adjusting the sag on the Spur it just worked. The Element didn't seem like it would ever be as good.