What are the major differences when classifying an agressive trail bike vs a true All Mountain rig. Can you list some examples of bikes that fit into each category.
Thanks
Thanks
That comparison is a bit extreme. But yes, you could ride most DH tracks on a XC bike, maybe excluding some drops. You could also ride a DH bike on a XC race track. Not that you'd really want to...so is a XC bike and a DH bike all marketing too. you can ride anything, anywhere? :thumbsup:
So mine falls into AM? I have On-One 456 (non-summer season) with 150mm Revelation Forks which should be in 66 degree. Nice...120-125mm rear travel, 69 deg HA: trail bike; 130-140mm/68 deg: aggressive trail bike, 150-160mm/66-67 deg - AM bike
As good of a classification as any. Has nothing to do with how you ride it.
I was talking about full suspension frames. Yeah, with hardtails you can go by fork travel and frame geometry to make the intended usage marketing classification. On-One sure fits the aggresive trail/"AM" class, just like my TransAm.So mine falls into AM? I have On-One 456 (non-summer season) with 150mm Revelation Forks which should be in 66 degree. Nice...![]()
+1 for truth.generally color specifies desegnated usage.
what can i say. some like Custom Les Pauls, some like Standard Les Pauls. sure you can play the same music on them but...That comparison is a bit extreme. But yes, you could ride most DH tracks on a XC bike, maybe excluding some drops. You could also ride a DH bike on a XC race track. Not that you'd really want to...
I'll give you a comparison that is relevant to this thread;
Show me a trail where one guy enjoys himself on a 6" bike with 67 degree head angle AND nobody on a 5" bike with 69 degree head angle could possibly have fun.
My neck-through Ibanez fits me well. Just keep those extra light strings away from me. D'Addario EXL110 Regular Light 10-46 is about right.some like Custom Les Pauls, some like Standard Les Pauls. sure you can play the same music on them but...
Wrong tool for the job but amazing anyway.For a bike, it's marketing. For a rider, it's a style. With the right mindset and skills you can ride any bike anywhere.
Check this out
We call that XC around these parts.Depends....
do you ride the trail, or do you look for every opportunity for a little air, or to fly over a rock-garden as opposed to pick your way through it?
If the latter, and you are not a flyweight then go for the bigger bike. I ride a Knolly Delirium ( Heavy AM / Light Freeride ) as my one and only, and I live in SW Ontario. Not someplace known for it's rough terrain - think great lakes floodplain. Most trails are pretty much pure XC in an out of ravines etc. I hit everything I can to up the fun factor on the downs. I also get the the lift access stuff as often as possible....
michael
Fun part is that a burly FR bike nowadays is lighter and easier to ride then some XC bikes that I still remember. Steel rigid, cantis.....and that was the point. If you just ride the XC and don't look for the big stuff, then the lighter bike will do. If you are looking for the drops, jumps, sketchy gnar chutes and doing the lifts, then go for the bigger bike. Even XC trails that have elevation changes do have some stuff to play on, ya just gotta go over the boulder in the corner not around it etc. As well does the OP ride any urban, you know, stairs, loading docks, structural elements etc.... it all adds up and you have to look at the big picture.
...and yes even though I live and ride in XC territory, I do not consider a 4 foot drop big and I hit the lifts every chance I can get. But then again I have been breaking bikes for 30+ years, so I maybe the odd duck.
your mileage may vary
michael
All trail bikes are over built to withstand abuse, try to see if there's any Pivot demo near you and give one a rip. What bike are you riding now, it may be the best way to determine what bike would fit your style better.Here is my question then as it relates to my original thread. Are some of the burly AM bikes out there an overkill or too much bike for your typical singletrack, fireroad, occasional rock garden, stepdown or 2-3ft drop. I know there will always be the exception for the "secret" local trails that require a true AM bike but for the average trail rider wouldn't an agressive trailbike fit the bill. I love the look and specs of a bike like the Pivot Firebird or the Banshee Rune but unless your riding the type of terrain that these bikes were designed for then it seems to be a overkill. I'm sure this type of marketing hype topic has been discussed before.
D@mn, you guys are harsh.
For: oceanminded,
Aggressive trail = slacker & tougher than your average trail bike; pedaling over compliance & big hits.
AM bike = much slacker, tougher, longer travel and more progressive suspension than an average trail bike; compliance & big hit over pedaling.
But there is plenty of bleed-over from bike company to bike company as there is no "standard" (hence the whining above)
Aggressive Trail = Banshee Spitfire
AM = Banshee Run
Differences just marketing? um. no.
Aggressive Trail = Specialized Stumpjumper EVO
AM = Specialized Enduro
Differences just marketing? no.
It's funny that everyone that has posted in this thread, frets over every part they put on their bike... then posts up as if they would pick out any frame to ride as it "is just marketing"
oceanminded, inform us what you want to do on a bike, terrain your ride etc. and you'll get better answers. Bike categories have been butchered by different companies so you can't really ask trail or AM or you get the Mountain Dew smashed against the head reaction above.
P