Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

KingCrimson

· Registered
Joined
·
534 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I'm on my first alloy chainring, and I just pulled it off today.

It's been ridden fairly hard for about 6 miles a day, every day, for about 40 days. I normally wouldn't choose aluminum, but it came on my Raleigh.

It was a bit grungy, so I tore it off to clean it. The bashguard and chain came off, and I got my first look at how it's been wearing.

It's horrible! 240 miles of singlespeed and it's already got messed up pitches (that clearly line up with where my cranks are on the downstroke, pretty interesting to see actually..)

All the anodization has been worn off the most heavily used teeth.

My steel cog on the otherhand, is perfect.

Is it normal for an alloy chainring to wear out that much in only 240 miles? If so, this one's going in the garbage by the end of the year. That's horrible.
 
Discussion starter · #3 ·
I just popped it back on.

DOH!

It was more a question of..should a chainring be noticeably de-pitched after 240 miles?

I've got steel chainrings on a trek from 1992 or so that aren't much worse. It's got a lot more miles, but then again, the forces on a geared bike are generally lesser and it's got 3 chainrings to share the wear, but my Raleigh has been religiously cleaned. I'm surprised how much wear there is.
 
No matter how you cut it, alloy chainrings are inferior to stainless steel chainrings. Consider yourself lucky because you can at least get stainless steel chainrings for your SS from Surly. On the other hand, I trail ride and can't get stainless steel chainrings.

Not too long ago before mico drives took over, stainless steel chainrings were widely available for Standard Drivetrains (34/36 middles and 24 grannys). Onza, Engagement and some others made kick ass stainless steel chainrings that lasted a long time under severe conditions (thus, causing less wear on the chain and cassette). Today, it seems only alloy chainrings are made for high-end use, the rings are over-priced, and don't last very long when used under harsh weather conditions or serious torque.
 
Discussion starter · #6 ·
I guess my 600 pound leg-press legs were just too much.

I was planning on a Surly Stainless bit the second I saw the teeth.

I was just curious if it's normal for an alloy ring to burn out so quickly. I guess it's a non-issue because my whole drivetrain is probably less than 50 dollars. INTO THE SAND I GO.
 
Hey, don't worry. I got my stock middle chainring (which I use exclusively) worn to a knob after only 400 miles. When I put pressure on it it just ratatas through. So the LBS put on a new one, i hope it's not the same, but we'll see in another 400 miles.
 
No

KingCrimson said:
It was more a question of..should a chainring be noticeably de-pitched after 240 miles?
I'd like to think you got a fluke there.
I've got aluminum chainrings with ~10000 miles on them that still work excellently.

I've also got come carbon fibre 'rings (read plastic) one of which has1500-2000 miles on it with only minor wear. I was pretty leary of it af first but got it dirt cheap so I gave it a try and it has held up better than expected.
 
Discussion starter · #11 ·
Well, you know I'm stronger than that jackass Cavendish!

I wonder how long a drivetrain lasts under his feet. I'll call Sram and see what they think. Thanks again for your help.


Edit: Called Sram, the guy told me to bring it into a shop, and they'll call and send out a new one.
 
KingCrimson said:
I

I was just curious if it's normal for an alloy ring to burn out so quickly.
It's somewhat normal if the chainring is stamped out of a soft aluminum like 6061. I've got a Blackspire DH/SS chainring on my single speed that is not only made from 7075, but it also has CNC cut teeth. It makes a huge difference in longevity.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts