Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 76 Posts

derby

· www.derbyrims.com
Joined
·
6,756 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I got the opportunity to demo the Dt Swiss SSD Carbon shock on my Mojo on my local trails thanks to Hans at Ibis. It is very nice for the Mojo, better in most ways in my opinion than the RP23 or DHX-Air.

First of all it looks great! And it is light, about 0.40 lb. with it’s gimbaled mounting hardware. Compare to the RP23 at about .65 lb. and DHX-A at 1.15 lb. with rigid mounting hardware).

The gimbaled shock mounting is very nice. I think it will help reduce bushing wear. I checked the rear end wheel sideways flex and there was no increase that was noticeable, still low in flex and no hint of sloppy linkage feel in my year and a half well ridden Mojo.

After tweaking with the air pressure I set sag about 25%. It took about 150 psi to get this sag (I couldn’t read the borrowed gauge without my glasses), less than the RP23 which I needed 170 psi as I remember. So I must have a larger air volume. And it rode more a little more linear, like it had more air volume.

And I counted the rebound clicks, 28, and set it about 12 clicks out from firm stop.

I tried the lockout on the street a few times approaching the trail head, and locked out my fork too. Both ends pumped themselves up to top out. The shock had a funny bouncy feeling on smooth pavement while pedaling at first but seemed to firm up with nearly no bounce after a short time. Locked out it was firmer than my medium 2-bar equivalent RP23 was with max propedal on.

Climbing up the trail was very smooth, smoother than the RP23 and didn't wallow as much as the DHX. And it felt lively, unlike the dead feeling from too much compression damping as the RP23 or the DHX with lots of propedal.

Wallow was very minimal over bumps whether climbing or on flats. I think the DT may have some very mild compression damping, but no platform dead feel at all, which is very nice on the Mojo.

The DT bobbed a little when standing and pedaling, less bob than the DHX with minimized propedal optimized for smoothness, and about the same as the RP23 with propedal open.

After some climbing and traversing more level trail I let a little air out to try nearly about 28% sag, more like what I normally use. The compression wasn't noticeably smoother with deeper sag, but the geometry of my bike felt more relaxed and familiar handling.

The trail was flatter and faster with some gradual and steep downs and few steep ups, with a good rock garden section for a quarter mile or so. I didn't notice any more wallow with the deeper sag.

The DT shock's rebound is sensitive to quarter turn (half click) adjustment near the middle of range.

I rode it a second day on the same familiar trail. I tried a click firmer rebound than what I ended up the day before, but it just felt too firm. So I kept softening the rebound until it felt like it would wallow noticeably, then firmed it up 1 click. It was softer a few clicks than yesterday, now 15 clicks out and had better bump compliance without bad wallow.

The DT is able to use near full travel easier than the RP23, nearly an inch deeper usable suspension travel than the RP23 ever did for me indicated by the o-ring on the shock. When seated or standing landing jumps and compressing through g-outs feels more plush than the RP23.

Standing downhill when the shock is unweighted it wasn't so impressively better than the RP23 really about the same, a bit dicey and chattery when at speed in downhill rock garden sections. The DHX is a little smoother in the same situation.

The dicey feel downhill may only be an issue for heavier riders using higher air spring pressures. I suspect the negative spring elastomer is a little bit too soft to fully cushion the rebound for the air pressure I need for my 200+ ride weight. I’m sure riders under 180 will have a soft top out feel. DT recommends that the negative spring elastomer be replaced once a year (they harden up). Perhaps there are different elastomers available form DT to fine tune for heavier riders.

In conclusion, overall I think the DT rides much better, it's smoother, livelier, and more plush, than the Fox RP23 in nearly all situations. And the DT has a little less wallow than the smoothest adjustment of the DHX-Air. But the Fox air shocks, especially the DHX-A, are a bit smoother downhill over rock gardens when standing due to a little better top out smoothness (more average, lighter in weight riders than me, using less air pressure probably won't notice this top out feel difference).

Compared to a stock RP23 I much prefer the DT performance. The DHX-Air might be able to be tuned to be very close in damping performance, but the DHX is much more complex to tune and heavier. The advantage the RP23 has is that it can be sent out to be custom tuned for the rider and Mojo by PUSH Industries for about $200 over the cost of the shock to perform even better than the DT, except in weight and looks.
 

Attachments

Nice write-up. Thanks.

That thing looks cool. It's exciting to think of making any improvement to an already amazing bike.

So it has spherical tie rod kinds of ends? I didn't know that. I can see why you checked out the rear. Neat!
 
More Locked climbing

derby said:
The advantage the RP23 has is that it can be sent out to be custom tuned for the rider and Mojo by PUSH Industries for about $200 over the cost of the shock to perform even better than the DT, except in weight and looks.
Thanks for great review.:thumbsup:
Was there any blowoff when locked climbing when hitting something ? Or when rolling over different objects at different speeds and dropoffs what was the experience like with it locked.
Maybe we can talk Darren into servicing them. I'll be he'd like to get his hands on one and take it apart.
Esp since the elast has to be replace yearly. (as of now will that be done in Europe or in Grand Junction(Dt US) I wonder. I'm a rebound junky so might be nice for me the elastomer rebound I mean.

When my SL comes in I guess I can compare with pushed RP23 I have that will fit Moj.
Still can't decide on the remote. http://www.dtswiss.com/Products/Accessories/Suspension_Accessories/XM-XR-Remote-Control.aspx
 
Hey, thanks for your review.

Quick question, though. Did you typically use the platform on the RP23? Are you comparing the DT to the RP23 with platform on or off, or mixed?

For example: I don't use as much travel on my RP23 if the platform is on (setting 2) whereas I might blow through a bit more of off. Certainly a harsher ride with platform on, but how is the ride of the DT compare to a RP23 with platform off/open (or a Float R, for that matter)?

On the other hand, when I get my lard-a$s out of the saddle my single-pivot bike performs much better with the platform. Is there any need for a platform on a bike as cool as the Mojo?

thanks,
Reamer
 
Discussion starter · #10 ·
reamer41 said:
Hey, thanks for your review.

Quick question, though. Did you typically use the platform on the RP23? Are you comparing the DT to the RP23 with platform on or off, or mixed?

For example: I don't use as much travel on my RP23 if the platform is on (setting 2) whereas I might blow through a bit more of off. Certainly a harsher ride with platform on, but how is the ride of the DT compare to a RP23 with platform off/open (or a Float R, for that matter)?

On the other hand, when I get my lard-a$s out of the saddle my single-pivot bike performs much better with the platform. Is there any need for a platform on a bike as cool as the Mojo?

thanks,
Reamer
No I never normally used propedal when I tired my Mojo with an RP23, except to try it out. But some Mojo riders do use propedal settings turned on while standing and pedaling. There's recent thread within the last month here in the Ibis forum about whether the Mojo needs Propedal, and how some riders use it part time.

Only once have I demoed a bike with a new Float-R factory set with minimum compression (labeled 1-bar). At Interbike's Dirt Demo this September I rode the new for '08 Felt Compulsion 5.5 inch travel bike. Besides being a very slow handing bike, the rear suspension felt dead with that shock as if over-damped. It may have been partly due to the wheel rate leverage probably being falling rate near sag. The Yeti 575 with a mild falling rate near sag is more bump compliant and plush riding, but bob's more than the Felt. The Felt mechanics were all apologetic that the Compulsion "didn't have the more free compressing RP23 compared to the Float-R". And they said they all rode their own Felt suspension bikes with old pre-propedal '04 and earlier Float-R shocks that have less compression damping than available with any new Fox shock today.

The older Fox shocks are not an option when purchasing a Mojo frame or bike today so I didn't review any comparison with them.

PUSH Industries is the cure for the over-damping and spiky damper performance of new Fox shocks today.

Monopivots and most horst links bob and leverage squat so much more than the dw-Link they are improved in pedaling without so much loss in handling quality by firmer damping.

I didn't ride with the DT shock's lockout long enough to test blowoff, It felt like if there is a threshold blowoff it is a very high, like maybe if landing a jump with lockout on by accident, but it's very firm feeling otherwise. To tell the truth, I wasn't interested in the lockout performance.

Overall the DT Swiss shock is the best match of a stock air shock I have ridden for the Mojo. I've heard that the Marzocchi Roco air shock has more platform than the RP23, so it would be worse for the dw-Link. There's a new '08 Rockshox air shock model that may have freer compression damping than the RP23 with propedal "off", but there are no ride reviews I've seen anywhere.
 
Discussion starter · #11 ·
burkut said:
That's an interesting cable routing. Talk to me Goose...what's the story.
I custom routed my cables below the top tube. It was a lot of careful work, about 8 hours, to carefully remove the stock stops and refinish the surface. I like the cleaner look better and it's more comfortable sitting on the TT when resting. It voided the center-frame warrantee, but I'm not worried. I've never understood cables above the top-tube design.
 
Thanks for the great report Derby...

You answered all of my questions concerning the specific characteristics of the RP23 and the DT. I was leaning toward the DT, but still had reservations, until now.

Thanks again,

Kevin
 
FoShizzle said:
to complete the ensemble, i would definitely get a charbon chain
In a way, today's sparkly carbon weaves are kind of like the glitter-infused fiberglass from the 1970's, albeit a bit more understated, no?
 
Discussion starter · #18 ·
ibisrox said:
They make carbon chains? *wondering stupidly to myself*
Fiber belt drive will be feasible for multi-speeds when frame mounted gearboxes become lighter and modular. CF will be a part of the gearbox future to improve crash durability and drop weight off the gearbox case and maybe the gear spindles.

It will be hard to beat the low friction, light weight, and ease of trail side maintenance of the double derailleurs and metal chains.
 
I have long admired the simple operation and enduring reliability of the Rohloff Speedhubs, despite their weight penalty. I wonder if anyone is running them with belt drive yet. That would be the ultimate in low maintenance and long term reliability.
 
Dt Swiss vs. Fox RP 23

Does anyone know the spring rates of the spec'd DT Swiss carbon shock vs. the 08 Fox RP23 shock? I have read where the Mojo was designed by Dave Weagle to work with the specific spring rate of the Fox RP 23 Shock (w high/ compression), and that the design spring rate curve is based on that specific shock? How does the DT Swiss compression spec'd for the Mojo SL compare?
 
1 - 20 of 76 Posts