Push Nine.one USD User Feedback, Reviews & Questions Answered

jeanjean said:

Does someone know what is meant with "inverted design"?

I don't understand why there is no fluid inside the stanchion.

Click to expand...

Jayem said:

Because the uppers are where the oil is, to lubricate the OUTSIDE of the stanchions. The lube oil sits above the stanchion seals, which are in the uppers.

Click to expand...

jeanjean said:

So only between the bushings, with no oil inside the main chamber.
Now I understand the maintenance video showing the insertion of fluid from the side with a syringe.

Click to expand...

MaverickRider said:

wat hij bedoelt is dat de buitenpoten (de dikkere) olie bevatten die de binnenpoten (waar je wiel e.d aan vast zit) smeren.

demperolie kan zich niet mengen met de olie van de binnenpoten want het is een gesloten systeem cartridge, net als zo'n beetje iedere vork tegenwoordig. Of je moet 20 jaar terug in de tijd gaan en met een RS Judy HydraCoil ofzo gaan rijden xD

Click to expand...

m3the01 said:

Anyone do their 50hr oil change? How much fluid were u able to pull?

Click to expand...

herr.kominek said:

My short review: PUSH Nine.One vs. Intend Edge – Two Premium USD Forks, Two Very Different Experiences
After more than two months of waiting, I finally received my new PUSH Nine.One fork. This gave me the opportunity to compare it with the Intend Edge Green Age, which I’ve been riding for over three years and still enjoy immensely. Both forks feature an upside-down (USD) design, are produced in small batches, and cost around €2300 here in Europe. But that’s where the similarities end.

First Impression: Surprised by the Weight
Right out of the box, I was surprised by the weight of the PUSH 9.1. Although its listed weight is 2.9 kg (compared to 2.2 kg for the Intend), it didn’t feel heavy in my hands – quite the opposite, actually. Its bulky construction likely helps mask the actual weight, both visually and physically. And once on the trail, I didn’t notice the extra weight at all. Both forks feel equally solid and robust in hand.

Build Quality: PUSH Has Some Catching Up to Do
When it comes to craftsmanship, the PUSH was a disappointment for me. Intend has set the bar extremely high with its immaculate manufacturing quality. From a brand like PUSH – which manufactures all components in-house in Colorado – I expected at least the same standard.

But reality didn’t quite meet those expectations. The PUSH 9.1 shows visible tool marks on the crown and outer stanchions, resembling rough machining – possibly with a dull tool. The final finish might have involved bead blasting, but the result feels raw and unfinished. Moreover, my fork has a visible 5mm groove under the crown on the left leg – likely a manufacturing defect. At this price point, I wouldn’t expect such an issue, especially from a product built, assembled, and quality-checked under one roof.

I sent photos directly to PUSH, but even after a week, I received no reply. That kind of customer support certainly doesn’t align with the premium image the brand portrays.

Aesthetic Details: Bronzed, But Not Consistent
My PUSH 9.1 came in a bronze finish, but the individual parts vary in shade. I understand that different aluminum alloys can produce different tones during anodizing, but I can’t see a good reason why even both dropouts – which should be identical – differ in color.

Well-Thought-Out Features
On the positive side, there are some smart technical details I really appreciate:

Bleed ports that don’t leak oil

Oil change ports that don’t require disassembly

Sturdy lower leg guards

Excellent brake hose routing – installation was very straightforward

Front wheel installation/removal is more effort-intensive on both forks compared to standard RSU forks, but that’s to be expected with USD designs.

Ride Characteristics: Each Fork Excels Differently
I’ve only had the PUSH 9.1 for a short time, but I’ve already managed to test it thoroughly. Torsional stiffness is a common point of discussion with USD forks, but here I have no complaints – the 9.1 is exceptionally stiff in the fore-aft direction, on par with the Intend. In tighter corners, I occasionally hear a slight rotor ping, which might suggest slightly less lateral stiffness.

When it comes to small bump sensitivity, the Intend Edge clearly has the upper hand. It’s incredibly responsive – almost unmatched in this regard. The PUSH 9.1 is closer to my older Fox 36 equipped with an Avy hybrid coil – good, but not outstanding.

However, in rough terrain – rocks, roots, steps – the PUSH 9.1 truly shines. It irons out everything with impressive smoothness, without diving excessively into its travel. I’ve never been able to tune the Intend Edge to behave quite like that, no matter how hard I tried.

Conclusion
Both the PUSH Nine.One and Intend Edge are excellent USD forks, but they excel in different environments. The Intend stands out for its precision and sensitivity on smaller trail chatter, while the PUSH dominates in rough, aggressive terrain. That said, I was let down by the PUSH’s finish quality – at this price, I expected more in terms of both appearance and customer support.

Verdict: If you’re looking for refinement, sensitivity, and flawless workmanship, go with the Intend. But if you mostly ride rough trails and want maximum performance on big hits, the PUSH 9.1 won’t let you down – as long as you can overlook a few imperfections.

Click to expand...

herr.kominek said:

My short review: PUSH Nine.One vs. Intend Edge – Two Premium USD Forks, Two Very Different Experiences
After more than two months of waiting, I finally received my new PUSH Nine.One fork. This gave me the opportunity to compare it with the Intend Edge Green Age, which I’ve been riding for over three years and still enjoy immensely. Both forks feature an upside-down (USD) design, are produced in small batches, and cost around €2300 here in Europe. But that’s where the similarities end.

First Impression: Surprised by the Weight
Right out of the box, I was surprised by the weight of the PUSH 9.1. Although its listed weight is 2.9 kg (compared to 2.2 kg for the Intend), it didn’t feel heavy in my hands – quite the opposite, actually. Its bulky construction likely helps mask the actual weight, both visually and physically. And once on the trail, I didn’t notice the extra weight at all. Both forks feel equally solid and robust in hand.

Build Quality: PUSH Has Some Catching Up to Do
When it comes to craftsmanship, the PUSH was a disappointment for me. Intend has set the bar extremely high with its immaculate manufacturing quality. From a brand like PUSH – which manufactures all components in-house in Colorado – I expected at least the same standard.

But reality didn’t quite meet those expectations. The PUSH 9.1 shows visible tool marks on the crown and outer stanchions, resembling rough machining – possibly with a dull tool. The final finish might have involved bead blasting, but the result feels raw and unfinished. Moreover, my fork has a visible 5mm groove under the crown on the left leg – likely a manufacturing defect. At this price point, I wouldn’t expect such an issue, especially from a product built, assembled, and quality-checked under one roof.

I sent photos directly to PUSH, but even after a week, I received no reply. That kind of customer support certainly doesn’t align with the premium image the brand portrays.

Aesthetic Details: Bronzed, But Not Consistent
My PUSH 9.1 came in a bronze finish, but the individual parts vary in shade. I understand that different aluminum alloys can produce different tones during anodizing, but I can’t see a good reason why even both dropouts – which should be identical – differ in color.

Well-Thought-Out Features
On the positive side, there are some smart technical details I really appreciate:

Bleed ports that don’t leak oil

Oil change ports that don’t require disassembly

Sturdy lower leg guards

Excellent brake hose routing – installation was very straightforward

Front wheel installation/removal is more effort-intensive on both forks compared to standard RSU forks, but that’s to be expected with USD designs.

Ride Characteristics: Each Fork Excels Differently
I’ve only had the PUSH 9.1 for a short time, but I’ve already managed to test it thoroughly. Torsional stiffness is a common point of discussion with USD forks, but here I have no complaints – the 9.1 is exceptionally stiff in the fore-aft direction, on par with the Intend. In tighter corners, I occasionally hear a slight rotor ping, which might suggest slightly less lateral stiffness.

When it comes to small bump sensitivity, the Intend Edge clearly has the upper hand. It’s incredibly responsive – almost unmatched in this regard. The PUSH 9.1 is closer to my older Fox 36 equipped with an Avy hybrid coil – good, but not outstanding.

However, in rough terrain – rocks, roots, steps – the PUSH 9.1 truly shines. It irons out everything with impressive smoothness, without diving excessively into its travel. I’ve never been able to tune the Intend Edge to behave quite like that, no matter how hard I tried.

Conclusion
Both the PUSH Nine.One and Intend Edge are excellent USD forks, but they excel in different environments. The Intend stands out for its precision and sensitivity on smaller trail chatter, while the PUSH dominates in rough, aggressive terrain. That said, I was let down by the PUSH’s finish quality – at this price, I expected more in terms of both appearance and customer support.

Verdict: If you’re looking for refinement, sensitivity, and flawless workmanship, go with the Intend. But if you mostly ride rough trails and want maximum performance on big hits, the PUSH 9.1 won’t let you down – as long as you can overlook a few imperfections.

Click to expand...

herr.kominek said:

My short review: PUSH Nine.One vs. Intend Edge – Two Premium USD Forks, Two Very Different Experiences
After more than two months of waiting, I finally received my new PUSH Nine.One fork. This gave me the opportunity to compare it with the Intend Edge Green Age, which I’ve been riding for over three years and still enjoy immensely. Both forks feature an upside-down (USD) design, are produced in small batches, and cost around €2300 here in Europe. But that’s where the similarities end.

First Impression: Surprised by the Weight
Right out of the box, I was surprised by the weight of the PUSH 9.1. Although its listed weight is 2.9 kg (compared to 2.2 kg for the Intend), it didn’t feel heavy in my hands – quite the opposite, actually. Its bulky construction likely helps mask the actual weight, both visually and physically. And once on the trail, I didn’t notice the extra weight at all. Both forks feel equally solid and robust in hand.

Build Quality: PUSH Has Some Catching Up to Do
When it comes to craftsmanship, the PUSH was a disappointment for me. Intend has set the bar extremely high with its immaculate manufacturing quality. From a brand like PUSH – which manufactures all components in-house in Colorado – I expected at least the same standard.

But reality didn’t quite meet those expectations. The PUSH 9.1 shows visible tool marks on the crown and outer stanchions, resembling rough machining – possibly with a dull tool. The final finish might have involved bead blasting, but the result feels raw and unfinished. Moreover, my fork has a visible 5mm groove under the crown on the left leg – likely a manufacturing defect. At this price point, I wouldn’t expect such an issue, especially from a product built, assembled, and quality-checked under one roof.

I sent photos directly to PUSH, but even after a week, I received no reply. That kind of customer support certainly doesn’t align with the premium image the brand portrays.

Aesthetic Details: Bronzed, But Not Consistent
My PUSH 9.1 came in a bronze finish, but the individual parts vary in shade. I understand that different aluminum alloys can produce different tones during anodizing, but I can’t see a good reason why even both dropouts – which should be identical – differ in color.

Well-Thought-Out Features
On the positive side, there are some smart technical details I really appreciate:

Bleed ports that don’t leak oil

Oil change ports that don’t require disassembly

Sturdy lower leg guards

Excellent brake hose routing – installation was very straightforward

Front wheel installation/removal is more effort-intensive on both forks compared to standard RSU forks, but that’s to be expected with USD designs.

Ride Characteristics: Each Fork Excels Differently
I’ve only had the PUSH 9.1 for a short time, but I’ve already managed to test it thoroughly. Torsional stiffness is a common point of discussion with USD forks, but here I have no complaints – the 9.1 is exceptionally stiff in the fore-aft direction, on par with the Intend. In tighter corners, I occasionally hear a slight rotor ping, which might suggest slightly less lateral stiffness.

When it comes to small bump sensitivity, the Intend Edge clearly has the upper hand. It’s incredibly responsive – almost unmatched in this regard. The PUSH 9.1 is closer to my older Fox 36 equipped with an Avy hybrid coil – good, but not outstanding.

However, in rough terrain – rocks, roots, steps – the PUSH 9.1 truly shines. It irons out everything with impressive smoothness, without diving excessively into its travel. I’ve never been able to tune the Intend Edge to behave quite like that, no matter how hard I tried.

Conclusion
Both the PUSH Nine.One and Intend Edge are excellent USD forks, but they excel in different environments. The Intend stands out for its precision and sensitivity on smaller trail chatter, while the PUSH dominates in rough, aggressive terrain. That said, I was let down by the PUSH’s finish quality – at this price, I expected more in terms of both appearance and customer support.

Verdict: If you’re looking for refinement, sensitivity, and flawless workmanship, go with the Intend. But if you mostly ride rough trails and want maximum performance on big hits, the PUSH 9.1 won’t let you down – as long as you can overlook a few imperfections.

Click to expand...

herr.kominek said:

My short review: PUSH Nine.One vs. Intend Edge – Two Premium USD Forks, Two Very Different Experiences
After more than two months of waiting, I finally received my new PUSH Nine.One fork. This gave me the opportunity to compare it with the Intend Edge Green Age, which I’ve been riding for over three years and still enjoy immensely. Both forks feature an upside-down (USD) design, are produced in small batches, and cost around €2300 here in Europe. But that’s where the similarities end.

First Impression: Surprised by the Weight
Right out of the box, I was surprised by the weight of the PUSH 9.1. Although its listed weight is 2.9 kg (compared to 2.2 kg for the Intend), it didn’t feel heavy in my hands – quite the opposite, actually. Its bulky construction likely helps mask the actual weight, both visually and physically. And once on the trail, I didn’t notice the extra weight at all. Both forks feel equally solid and robust in hand.

Build Quality: PUSH Has Some Catching Up to Do
When it comes to craftsmanship, the PUSH was a disappointment for me. Intend has set the bar extremely high with its immaculate manufacturing quality. From a brand like PUSH – which manufactures all components in-house in Colorado – I expected at least the same standard.

But reality didn’t quite meet those expectations. The PUSH 9.1 shows visible tool marks on the crown and outer stanchions, resembling rough machining – possibly with a dull tool. The final finish might have involved bead blasting, but the result feels raw and unfinished. Moreover, my fork has a visible 5mm groove under the crown on the left leg – likely a manufacturing defect. At this price point, I wouldn’t expect such an issue, especially from a product built, assembled, and quality-checked under one roof.

I sent photos directly to PUSH, but even after a week, I received no reply. That kind of customer support certainly doesn’t align with the premium image the brand portrays.

Aesthetic Details: Bronzed, But Not Consistent
My PUSH 9.1 came in a bronze finish, but the individual parts vary in shade. I understand that different aluminum alloys can produce different tones during anodizing, but I can’t see a good reason why even both dropouts – which should be identical – differ in color.

Well-Thought-Out Features
On the positive side, there are some smart technical details I really appreciate:

Bleed ports that don’t leak oil

Oil change ports that don’t require disassembly

Sturdy lower leg guards

Excellent brake hose routing – installation was very straightforward

Front wheel installation/removal is more effort-intensive on both forks compared to standard RSU forks, but that’s to be expected with USD designs.

Ride Characteristics: Each Fork Excels Differently
I’ve only had the PUSH 9.1 for a short time, but I’ve already managed to test it thoroughly. Torsional stiffness is a common point of discussion with USD forks, but here I have no complaints – the 9.1 is exceptionally stiff in the fore-aft direction, on par with the Intend. In tighter corners, I occasionally hear a slight rotor ping, which might suggest slightly less lateral stiffness.

When it comes to small bump sensitivity, the Intend Edge clearly has the upper hand. It’s incredibly responsive – almost unmatched in this regard. The PUSH 9.1 is closer to my older Fox 36 equipped with an Avy hybrid coil – good, but not outstanding.

However, in rough terrain – rocks, roots, steps – the PUSH 9.1 truly shines. It irons out everything with impressive smoothness, without diving excessively into its travel. I’ve never been able to tune the Intend Edge to behave quite like that, no matter how hard I tried.

Conclusion
Both the PUSH Nine.One and Intend Edge are excellent USD forks, but they excel in different environments. The Intend stands out for its precision and sensitivity on smaller trail chatter, while the PUSH dominates in rough, aggressive terrain. That said, I was let down by the PUSH’s finish quality – at this price, I expected more in terms of both appearance and customer support.

Verdict: If you’re looking for refinement, sensitivity, and flawless workmanship, go with the Intend. But if you mostly ride rough trails and want maximum performance on big hits, the PUSH 9.1 won’t let you down – as long as you can overlook a few imperfections.

Click to expand...

TheAngryMonkey said:

I recently noticed oil on the lower stanchions after my last two rides and sent an email back on 6/4 about it with pics. I got a reply from Darren asking if it was just one or both stanchions and then did not hear back after I replied. I just did the 50 hour service this morning and only pulled about 12 and 18ml of oil which leads me to believe there is a problem with the seals. View attachment 2148952 View attachment 2148956
View attachment 2148955

Click to expand...

PUSHIND said:

With the launch of our VT/X rear shock our small team has been having some challenges keeping up with inbound messages and phone calls. It's temporary and tends to happen during our product launches, but I still apologize.

As for the build quality, I understand that you're referring to the cosmetic "witness marks" from the second op machining. This is a very unique and very challenging component to manufacture, and we're always looking at ways to improve our process. Producing a traditional size and shape crown like our competitors would be straightforward, creating a perfect aesthetic, but it wouldn't produce the performance characteristics we're looking for.

With the outer tube, you're not looking at a groove, but rather a transition in the tube shape. Our proprietary assembly process for the outer tube and the crown requires a unique machining profile on the tube where it overlaps the crown. Because the crown is angled at the bottom, it exposes this transition in the machining process. If the bottom of the crown were perpendicular to the tub,e we could simply hide this transition, but again the angle in the bottom of the crown gives us a certain characteristic that we want.

Lastly is the mismatch in color of the axle lugs. These are not anodized, they are Cerakote, which doesn't have the variables found with the anodizing process. We only use specific Cerakote Graphite Black and Cerakote Burnt Bronze, so I'm not sure how they could be mismatched. Never say never, but this is not something we're aware of.

Regardless, we always appreciate the feedback and use it as part of our process for continuous improvement.

I'm stoked that you like the performance of the 9.1, but the comment regarding small bump sensitivity has me a bit confused, especially when comparing to an air spring system, which has much higher friction. I'd be interested to know your setup to see if we might be able to assist with setup. Additionally, we'd like to see 40-50 miles of ride time to fully break in before making too many changes.

Click to expand...