Rust never sleeps. And that's why there's stainless steel bike frames. New Starling Roost build in the que.
The owner of Starling is an engineer. He has a reason for it. I honestly can't figure it out just looking at it. He has some interesting ideas on bikes. In fact he's quite controversial as I see it. Read his tech blogs. I agree with him about 90% of the time, then sometimes he loses me. And sometimes although he has something technically correct, he may just be putting his own spin of BS on it - which frankly isn't uncommon amongst engineers. That is to say it's true what he says, but it's not easy to prove whether or not it has a significant effect.SS is the single most promising yet underutilized material in frame building. The properties of some of these SS alloys are incredible. I wish more would use it in lieu of, or in addition to, titanium. Of course SS fabrication requires some specialized welding techniques, but worth it IMO.
That particular frame design is a bit odd. The stay design appears to be more artistic expression than functional design. I don't mind it tough.
Better known as 17-4, which is incredibly common.I found this on the Frame manufactures(ORA) site. this is not to say the Starling IS the same material but its far more likely.
630 Stainless Steel Tubes
![]()
Stainless Steel Mountain Bike Frame 25-S6M303
• 650B MTB Bike Frame• 630 Stainless Steel Tubes :T/T OD34.9*0.9/0.6/0.9mm D/T OD38.1*1.1/0.9/0.6/0.85mm S/T OD34.9*0.95mmS/S OD16*0.8mm Taper To 12.5mmC/S OD22.2*0.8mm Taper To 16mm C05• Head Tube ID44mm• UDH Slider Dropout B09BS6197A• x-12/10mm With Disc/Flat/Post Mount Hanger• C/S Yoke...ora-engineering.com
Maybe in America, Here in Aus, most metals are listed in a Euro/Metric fashionBetter known as 17-4, which is incredibly common.
Most of us are multi-lingual re: grade designations, even if we only speak English. It’s a small world metallurgically speaking.Maybe in America, Here in Aus, most metals are listed in a Euro/Metric fashion
It depends on the age of the person having the discussion as many of the older trade people tend to mix metric and Imperial, US/Euro
Here the young Trades and engineers are far more metric-orientated, it's a real problem when most of the old infrastructure was built in UK imperial 😅 its making for some ..... Interesting momentsMost of us are multi-lingual re: grade designations, even if we only speak English. It’s a small world metallurgically speaking.
I'm wanting to be educated, too, to differentiate this stainless from the not-so-impressive standard stainless I'm more familiar with.PS Not all stainlesses are created equal and stainless can rust, particularly the lower grade stainless's.
For comparison, Reynolds "931" would probably be closest to what it is. Although that's still a guess...I too grumped about not divulging the grade. This is only three grades, so not super helpful, but shows these three grades against non-stainless alloys.
View attachment 2099369
View attachment 2099371
Looks like identical properties to Reynolds 853, which is seriously good stuff. Just without the oxidation tendencies.Better known as 17-4, which is incredibly common.