Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
41 - 60 of 83 Posts
That's basically every 36mm fork other than the X fusion metric. The metric runs a beefier chassis than other 36mm forks. yari/ava should be under though I can't remember if the Ava damper is open bath or a cartridge? If it's bath it might tip over that 2kg mark?
Nah, most Fox 36's are 2.1-2.2kg. GRIP/GRIP2 forks are significantly heavier than FIT4.
 
When I had a Diamond, I tried everything to get it to be smoother/less spikey. I sent it back, I tried adjusting the adjusters in all sorts of combinations and so on. I was replacing a Pike and hoping that I'd end up with something better, but in reality, it was significantly heavier and worked no better, worse actually. Tried it here, tried it in Colorado, tried it in AZ, it just never sucked up square edged hits well or in a controlled way.
 
I've had every compression dial hsc/lsc wide open on all my forks and shocks. By the time I have the spring rate to keep the front end up on the brakes in steep rollers and keep the rear end up in fast berms so the front doesn't understeer it doesn't need anything else slowing it down. YMMV
LSC should be doing a lot of the work there. IMO unless you're very light weight if opening your compression damper as much as possible makes it feel better there's something wrong.
 
LSC should be doing a lot of the work there. IMO unless you're very light weight if opening your compression damper as much as possible makes it feel better there's something wrong.
Indeed. If you can't ride with LSC closed then your damper tune is wrong.
 
Compression damping controls how fast the spring settles, not where it settles. If you're on the brakes or in a berm for more than a couple of seconds and don't like the dynamic ride height it's a spring problem.
Very nice theory. How ever in almost all off-road suspension systems this is simply not true in practise.
This is easily detectable when measuring travel usage with clickers open (or very light damping) vs clickers in appropriate position (or proper damping).
No damping causes travel to overshoot due to momentum, whether it be wheel coming up, or chassis going down.
Deeper settled height occurs (after overshoot) because of friction, and inertia.
 
Very nice theory. How ever in almost all off-road suspension systems this is simply not true in practise.
This is easily detectable when measuring travel usage with clickers open (or very light damping) vs clickers in appropriate position (or proper damping).
No damping causes travel to overshoot due to momentum, whether it be wheel coming up, or chassis going down.
Deeper settled height occurs (after overshoot) because of friction, and inertia.
Your comment does not relate to @JMLAD post at all.
 
Discussion starter · #54 ·
If my SAG is in the 15% range at my weight with my current forks, does that tell me that it’ll support me through the full stroke? If I were to get say a fox 38 grip x2 and got in the 15-20% will that fork then be “working for me”?
 
Not true, a good tune will put you in the middle of the range.

If your LSC is completely closed, your damper tune is wrong.
Last time you tried to talk about suspension you didn't know what a damper did and what a spring did. Can you tell us now?

If my SAG is in the 15% range at my weight with my current forks, does that tell me that it’ll support me through the full stroke? If I were to get say a fox 38 grip x2 and got in the 15-20% will that fork then be “working for me”?
Nah, sag on an air fork depends almost entirely on negative air effects at the top of the travel and suspension performance is determined by midstroke spring-rate.
The correlation is loose at best and shouldn't be relied on as more than the roughest of starting points.
 
Last time you tried to talk about suspension you didn't know what a damper did and what a spring did. Can you tell us now?
Last time you tried to show off your “knowledge” you didn't know the difference between stock and a tuned fork. Go learn the difference and get back to us once you figure it out.
 
Before this thread goes down hill any further (I thought SilentMTB put Dougal on ignore, apparently not. Lol)?

Maybe a more practical option would be to ride what you have. Focus on getting in shape, getting faster and then after you loose the weight in a few months, reevaluate what fork you want.
 
If my SAG is in the 15% range at my weight with my current forks, does that tell me that it’ll support me through the full stroke? If I were to get say a fox 38 grip x2 and got in the 15-20% will that fork then be “working for me”?
I would say 15% at your weight is too soft. You portably need to be close to nothing to have mid stroke support and avoid bottoming excessively. I'm 150lbs and probably run 5% sag if even that. Sag is important for the rear shock because it's relevant to the suspension design. That's not the case for a fork. It's totally fine to have next to nothing if that's what the rider needs. Pump your fork up so it barely sags and see what you think. You'll likely need to run rebound nearly closed to not have a pogo stick.
 
Before this thread goes down hill any further (I thought SilentMTB put Dougal on ignore, apparently not. Lol)?

Maybe a more practical option would be to ride what you have. Focus on getting in shape, getting faster and then after you loose the weight in a few months, reevaluate what fork you want.
Why should I? If he has problems with my posts, he can put me on his ignore list.
 
41 - 60 of 83 Posts