Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 23 Posts

TheNatureBoy

· Registered
Joined
·
1,131 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I can get a Rocky Mountain c-30 Carbon 27.5 Terrence’s NEW XL

$2300

vs

Wyatt Maverick Aluminum - made in US .
Closer to $3k
Little longer reach little higher stack .

I’m 6 5 ish

Both bikes have modern MTB geometry.

My reservations - I’ve never ridden either.

Anyone ride a Rocky Mountain? The colors are meh.
 
I just bought the RM C30. 2 weeks ago.
So far, every time I ride it I am just so impressed with the bike. It is really lively, responsive, and a really fun ride. Climbs really well and it inspires confidence on the DH, Regarding the color, the guy at the shop told me it looked way better in person, I agree. The color scheme continues to grow on me.
The bike is simply awesome and I should have bought one 2 years ago.

When looking, the Maverick wasn't an option because I'm done riding aluminum hardtails.

I have absolutely nothing but praise for the RM Blizzard. Great bike! My only complaint is they don't sell the frameset.
 
I’m 6’3” with a 37” inseam and when I test rode a XL Blizzard in spring, the seat tube was too short. The already long seatpost was at the minimum insertion line, which made me nervous.

If you have shorter legs, it’s a really great bike. Long reach, modern geometry.

If you have longer legs, you probably want to go bigger.

Image
 
The Rocky geo is great if you’re doing any descending, feels much more like a mountain bike than most fatties which have super steep HTAs. If the seat tube is short for you, that means you can probably fit a OneUp 240 in there for tons of drop.

The spec on the C30 is nice, except for the stock hub. I’ve had a bunch of issues with the SunRingle SRC, although they’ve all been covered under warranty.
 
Discussion starter · #8 ·
I’m 6’3” with a 37” inseam and when I test rode a XL Blizzard in spring, the seat tube was too short. The already long seatpost was at the minimum insertion line, which made me nervous.

If you have shorter legs, it’s a really great bike. Long reach, modern geometry.

If you have longer legs, you probably want to go bigger.

View attachment 2075288
Good looking rig!
 
Generally, I will take carbon over aluminum. That is a big deal in my book. The RM is a touch slack for me but I am riding on snow, even though our trails are pretty steep here in Colorado. If I rode it on dirt as well, it would be fine. I'd say go for the RM. I rarely find bikes that do not fit well if they are large size frames so I am not on the cusp of two sizes. If you are, that is a consideration.
 
At 6'5" you need a really long reach.

My son is your size and he rides my Kona Wozo in a siz large and finds it fits fine, but I suspect an XL would have been better; at 6' I rode a medium Wozo.

So I'd look for a frame/bike that has similar geometry to a Wozo XL.
 
How much for a 350 hub ?
Fwiw both of the bikes you mentioned have the same hub (SunRingle SRC), so this is a criticism of both. Generally speaking, all fat bike hubs suck, except for the DT Swiss.

Depends on the site that you get it from. You can get it online from some Euro sites for ~$270 USD. From US sites it's ~$340.
 
You can run it 4 seasons right ?
I may go 27.5 x 4.0 and sell the Terrence
I've run it in summer during a spell of masochism, but wouldn't do so regularly for a variety of reasons:
-I don't trust the tire sidewalls during pointy rock season.
-fat tires hold A LOT of air, which essentially act like undampened suspension on rooty and rocky trails. It feels like bouncing on yoga balls.
-Geo isn't outrageous for general trail riding but it also isn't ideal. The seat tube is a little slacker than I'd prefer in summer, but is great for snow since it helps keep your rear wheel from spinning out. Q-factor is wide and would be annoying on some of the tight rock gaps I ride through in the summer.

This is a bike that is insanely fun to ride on snowy singletrack. It also handles sandy beach riding like a champ. I don't find it to be the right tool for the job for most other uses. Granted, it can be fun to intentionally ride the "wrong" bike once in a while for a challenge or just to mix things up a bit. But I would not want the Blizzard to be my only bike.

And in regard to downsizing from a 4.5 to a 4.0 tire -- DON'T!!! A 27.5x4.0 is fine if you only ride firm and groomed trails. But if you ever ride in fresh snow or less ideal conditions, that extra float of the 4.5 will distribute your weight more and give you a much better riding experience.
 
I have that Sun Ringle SRC hub on my Pivot too. I'm planning in advance for the replacement. DT350 or Bitex, which I hear is solid. I'll rebuild the rear wheel, most likely. Hate to have that SRC implode in the middle of some snowy backcountry mountain ride.
 
…test rode a XL Blizzard in spring, the seat tube was too short. The already long seatpost was at the minimum insertion line, which made me nervous.

If you have shorter legs, it’s a really great bike. Long reach, modern geometry.

If you have longer legs, you probably want to go bigger.
Why not run a longer dropper?:unsure:

I’m also 6’3” and run a 170mm dropper on my XXL fatty with a 510mm seat tube. The 480 seat tube length on the XL Blizzard would be much better as I could then run an even longer 200mm dropper.
 
1 - 20 of 23 Posts