Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
21 - 31 of 31 Posts
I'll be changing my XXL Hightower over to Saints from the stock Code RS. I'm 280#. Right now I have 203 front and rear. No super I don't ride anything super steep on a regular basis. Would 203mm be fine for the Saints or should I look into 220 up front? If so, which rotors are good?
The real question is Do you have issues braking currently with 203's? 220/223 will def have more power but if you don't need it, why change. TBH 220 or 223 will be fine, adapter wise you need a +40mm or +43mm for 180 post mount for most new frames and Fox and RS forks, and +20mm or +23mm for the Zeb which is 200mm post mount. For mounts, you'd have to get a non Shimano adapter as they don't make a +40 if you go 220, Galfer/Magura/Sram and many other brands do. If you try 220 on the rear, be careful of rear end flex. if you only have 1-2mm of clearance from the rotors edge and the chainstay, flex can cause the rotor to cut into your frame during hard cornering.
 
Maybe 203 is enough. I don't have trouble stopping per se, but I'm changing from the Code to Shimano because I prefer the on/off feeling (I have Shimano XT on my other bike). So maybe I'm overthinking how much I really need to change with my current setup?
 
Just coming here to look down at the peasants running little rotors.

225mm for a decade or so on my bike =)

Edit: Hope 225mm rotors. Allegedly designed for mopeds, not bikes. No idea how old they are. Might even be closer to 20 years...
Anyone know when they were released?

Image
 
You may want to check with both the fork and frame manufacturer regarding compatibility. Just because the 220 fits, doesn't mean 220 is intended for that set up.

My primary trail bike in 2009 was only designed for 6" rotors. Using anything larger on the rear triangle or front fork would void their respective warranties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mudguard
...For mounts, you'd have to get a non Shimano adapter as they don't make a +40 if you go 220, Galfer/Magura/Sram and many other brands do...
Shimano now makes a +40mm adapter for 180mm post mounts to 220mm rotors. I'm running one and plan to put one on another bike soon. But the only 220mm rotors they seem to make at the moment are Deore/SLX RT64 and RT66.

 
Discussion starter · #27 ·
Because in 2018 (my year 36) they didn't have 220mm rotors. Why would they spec for a product that doesn't exist yet? The new Fox 36 which still have the same 180mm mount say "if using a 203mm - 223mm rotor, you will need to source the appropriate caliper spacer and bolts."
 
Shimano now makes a +40mm adapter for 180mm post mounts to 220mm rotors. I'm running one and plan to put one on another bike soon. But the only 220mm rotors they seem to make at the moment are Deore/SLX RT64 and RT66.

Now that they just added the RT-66 220 rotor to their lineup that makes sense. Now they just need to add 220mm versions of their Icetech rotors instead of just the cheap one.
 
Because in 2018 (my year 36) they didn't have 220mm rotors. Why would they spec for a product that doesn't exist yet? The new Fox 36 which still have the same 180mm mount say "if using a 203mm - 223mm rotor, you will need to source the appropriate caliper spacer and bolts."
Nine inch rotors have been around a long time. Hayes made them at least a decade ago, maybe longer. Now how popular they were is another question.
 
Nine inch rotors have been around a long time. Hayes made them at least a decade ago, maybe longer. Now how popular they were is another question.
Easily available? No. I've seen some giant tandem rotors over the years too, but same thing, not easily or consistently available. In about the last 3 years, 220, 223 and 225 rotors have become much easier to get and more and more companies have jumped onboard...now if the idiots could just agree on a standard diameter. Before that...yeah, there were some, occasionally, but not easy to get ahold of or get adapters for. They weren't even making 180 and 200mm brake mount forks back in the day either.

It makes sense though to increase the thickness significantly at this diameter, since it's bigger and flopper and easier to warp/get out of true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mudguard
Easily available? No. I've seen some giant tandem rotors over the years too, but same thing, not easily or consistently available.
The funny thing was Hayes used to have them on their website (maybe when they released the Radar, 2008ish?) and listed the weights for all other sizes but against the 9" they had some like Very Heavy!
 
21 - 31 of 31 Posts