Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 60 Posts

mikesee

· This place needs an enema
Joined
·
20,144 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
The way things seem to be going is that fat-specific components that aren't directly killing it are being killed off directly:

Image


Anyone actually have any fatbike expansion products to report?

I know of one (literal, figurative) big one, but can't spill those beans for a few weeks yet.
 
Damn.

All I have seen is contraction in this department. My understanding is that Surly is killing off a bike and a few "supporting" products, but won't mention specifics here until they're formally announced.

There's been a bloodbath wrt fat bikes/components.
 
Discussion starter · #3 ·
Remember the rumors of a few short years ago, where Surly was allegedly coming out with something bigger than the Moonlander?

And then the Moonie died...

I like to think they've just been really fine tuning the replacement, and are going to re-release it any day now...
 
I like to think they've just been really fine tuning the replacement, and are going to re-release it any day now...
Yep.

But Surly has been killing off "niche" bikes for the last ~5 years. And replacing them with bikes that are ostensibly hybrids with skinnier and skinnier tires.

I'm really hoping for that Moonie replacement, and do so with bated breath.
 
The ICT and Wednesday both weigh a ton. Few people are going to see a steel bike as having "high end option" vs "low end option". It's a damn heavy steel fat bike that gets the job done and that's the beginning and end of the strory.

If people want a high end fat bike they will go look at a Salsa.
 
Discussion starter · #10 ·
The ICT and Wednesday both weigh a ton. Few people are going to see a steel bike as having "high end option" vs "low end option". It's a damn heavy steel fat bike that gets the job done and that's the beginning and end of the strory.

If people want a high end fat bike they will go look at a Salsa.

I take your point, but calling Salsa high-end is pretty rich, given that they're mass produced in Asia with all of the attendant warranty issues that come with that.

Now, if Salsa actually stood behind their bikes when they failed I might be willing to grant you the point. Alas...
 
I take your point, but calling Salsa high-end is pretty rich, given that they're mass produced in Asia with all of the attendant warranty issues that come with that.

Now, if Salsa actually stood behind their bikes when they failed I might be willing to grant you the point. Alas...
"high end" as in Carbon. I think manufacturers are getting to "1 Fat Bike in the lineup" is probably enough.

Surly doesn't exactly stand behind their bikes either IMO.
I had a ICT frame rust from the inside out even with the LBS trying to coat the inside every year. Yet Surly's warranty is only 3 years. I had a Carbon road bike from break after 12 years and Raleigh gave me $700 cash.

I also blew out the bottom bracket on another ICT inside a year, Surly said "we owe you a hub but don't have one at this time".

I had a new Midnight Special have the rear rim cracking around the spokes in multiple spots, crickets from them when I complained. Same bike had the rear hub packed with the wrong lube, looked like wax was in there and it prevented hub from engaging if the temp dropped to below 40 degrees.

"Tough guys, doing tough things on bikes with beards and beer" lol my ass.
I will never buy another Surly again, they are posers IMO.
 
Discussion starter · #13 ·
So now your down to like five 27.5 tires to choose from?

Assuming you meant "you're", then I can think of 10-11 off the top of my head.

Normally people would insert a disclaimer here along the lines of "I wouldn't argue with more...", but honestly, I'll never use half of what we already have.

I definitely won't miss the FBF or FBR. But the loss of the Hodag is still felt...
 
Discussion starter · #14 ·
"high end" as in Carbon. I think manufacturers are getting to "1 Fat Bike in the lineup" is probably enough.

Surly doesn't exactly stand behind their bikes either IMO.
I had a ICT frame rust from the inside out even with the LBS trying to coat the inside every year. Yet Surly's warranty is only 3 years. I had a Carbon road bike from break after 12 years and Raleigh gave me $700 cash.

I also blew out the bottom bracket on another ICT inside a year, Surly said "we owe you a hub but don't have one at this time".

I had a new Midnight Special have the rear rim cracking around the spokes in multiple spots, crickets from them when I complained. Same bike had the rear hub packed with the wrong lube, looked like wax was in there and it prevented hub from engaging if the temp dropped to below 40 degrees.

"Tough guys, doing tough things on bikes with beards and beer" lol my ass.
I will never buy another Surly again, they are posers IMO.

The gist of your post seems to be assuming I was standing up for Surly. Not sure where you got that idea.

Bummer you had such bad luck with them. Can't hardly blame you for feeling the way you do.
 
Let's get back on track.

Esker produced a new Ti fat bike, the Walden.

They adopted a S1-S4 sizing scheme, which many in the industry are doing.

Haven't ridden it, but $2300 for a Ti frame is reasonable. So this is an example of product expansion from an up-and-coming brand.

Keep in mind, these are the same folks who brought you Terrene tires, so, customer service-wise, YMMV.
 
Surly doesn't exactly stand behind their bikes either IMO.
Surly's complete bike offerings are junk...as are most of the industry's. By building your own, you can get quality components, wheels, and tires while saving a lot of weight(if that's your thing?).

Also, curious how an ICT frame can rust out from the inside if it has been ED coated AND has a treatment of Framesaver, Fluid Film, et al...?
 
ICT rotting out (or ANY other ferrous frame), I can almost guarantee it was used on the road, with all the salt and fracking brine that comes with that territory.

That said, agreed, Surly hasn't had a good idea (or any, frankly) since Sov left, but "hey, look, we offer the Preamble in drop and flat bar configs, aren't we clever?"

Yawn, another hybrid, err, Garvel, errr, CX, errr, skinny MTB with smoother tires, and everything old is new again.

The industry writ large, got burned by not being the first to offer, 29, then Fat (i'll ignore 650B since most folks were never that excited about 'em anyway), and have spent the last decade licking their wounds, waiting, or actively trying to produce the next big thing so they can print money like they used to.

But mid sized independent shops are being run out of town, major brands are selling direct to consumer (in direct competition with their own dealership network, regardless of the sunny partnership crap they spin), and what we're seeing is all this crap coming home to roost (plus residual pandemic issues).

The industry as we knew it, is gone. Creatives within it (which used to be the drivers of most innovation) are gone.

What's left, is an industry trying to figure out how to monetize a bike boom that lasted two years, since the future otherwise, is the resumption of the decline in interest we've been seeing for the last 15+ years.

But hey, new bikes are $15K, a beginner MTB that you'd actually ride in the woods, is north of a grand, and below that, just shop at your local big box store. So we've got that going for us, right?

As for QBP/Surly et al?

When Steve Flagg stepped down and handed over the reins to some Dial Soap salesman in a suit, everything went to hell in a handcart, and quickly.

Talent ran for the hills. The human touch they used to have, is gone. CS agents who would go above and beyond, are now few and far between. Innovation in their house brands, hit a wall. Brands that were cool, and perhaps quirky, were dropped. Everything coming in, brand wise, is huge corporate crap. Colors, choices, sizes, styles, all have been massaged to the minimum needed to say they offer a "range of products".

The new management at Q, has ruined the company.

But hey, their Diversity portrayal is doing well, lots of POC and women with piercings and ink are now commonly shown in the pics on their site. Nothing against that, obviously, but it's one more sign that management is paying attention to the bigger picture, while the smaller details that actually made them a decent company, get snipped and trimmed into oblivion.....

It's sad that the only positive thing they've accomplished is showing that there are more folks that ride, than white dudes and their occasional girlfriend.
 
Trek seems to still be updating their offerings, although the frame/geo updates have already been accomplished by other companies. I think that as long as decent tires are made, there will be a decent market. Especially as the winter ultra events continue to gather attention.
 
1 - 20 of 60 Posts