Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
21 - 40 of 111 Posts
The base-valve is heavily preloaded with a dished piston. That's never going to feel any good as every hit ramps up a quadratic spike to meet the damping curve.
Increasing LSC further adds harshness.
The high speed compression adjust is a choke. Simply a stepped cone closing up a fixed size hole. That's not what people need.
The rebound assembly is incredibly complicated for no gain.
It uses rubber check valve springs on the base-valve and a bizarre stepped shim setup as the mid-valve check shim.
It's a PITA to dismantle/assemble and can't even be vacuum bled.
5 and 9mm shims are another major PITA.

My Charger Damper pecking order.
Charger 2.1 RC or RC2
Charger 2.1 RCT3
Charger 1 RC
Charger 1 RCT3
Charger 2 RC
Charger 2 RC2/RCT3
Charger 3 RC2.

At this point I'm advising my customers to keep last years Rockshox forks. Zeb should be backwards compatible to Charger 2.1 (just ditch the buttercup). Lyrik I don't know if they've changed threads or internal clearance. Likely not but it needs checked.
Ok. Got to wonder why it gets so good review then? Are you just meaning from a service/tuning perspetive? Your opinion is kind of the opposite compared to all reviews I've seen thus far.
Quite a few people who're really good at riding bikes find it a big upgrade in the performance department and call it a really really good fork.
 
Ok. Got to wonder why it gets so good review then? Are you just meaning from a service/tuning perspetive? Your opinion is kind of the opposite compared to all reviews I've seen thus far.
Quite a few people who're really good at riding bikes find it a big upgrade in the performance department and call it a really really good fork.
The gap in understanding suspension between someone like Dougal and someone writing a pinkbike review is massive, and that's putting it lightly. Most reviewers just don't have a clue and especially compared to a suspension tech like Dougal. Reviewers also tend to go on about how great something new is, then when the new iteration of it comes out, all of a sudden it is addressing problems with the previous (current) version that they never mentioned. I can near guarantee when the Charger 3.1 or 4 or whatever comes out, they are all of a sudden gonna be talking about how harsh the previous iteration was and the new one improves on it.

Forgetting the reviewers and engineers, even, I feel like most riders don't have a clue how to set things up or distinguish differences between the way things feel. I know some really good riders who know next to nothing about how suspension works or don't know what a damper is, so being a good rider doesn't have anything to do with it (which is also why elite level riders work with suspension techs). So you need to consider that being a publication reviewer or good rider has nothing to do with actually understanding the engineering behind the way a fork performs.

There are also plenty of complaints about the small bump compliance and tracking of the new gen Charger 3 forks, even an entire thread on the subject here for the new Lyrik.
 
Ok. Got to wonder why it gets so good review then? Are you just meaning from a service/tuning perspetive? Your opinion is kind of the opposite compared to all reviews I've seen thus far.
Quite a few people who're really good at riding bikes find it a big upgrade in the performance department and call it a really really good fork.
Charger 3 does not get good reviews from anyone who knows what they are talking about.

The new RS stuff is a step back; really stiff dampers to make up for really soft air springs due to even larger negative chambers. This leads to harshness from the damper, compounded by a massive wall of progression from the air spring because you have to run such higher pressures. Feels nice and "plush" off the top for shop floor appeal, but rides like crap. We're back to original Debonair with 10-15mm of unsupported travel off the top, this makes the fork ride deeper in the travel, and closer to the dreaded compression wall. The new RS air spring looks just like the Vorsprung Luftkappe on the dyno.

From the Wizard of NZ himself;
Image



Dirt bikes have the suspension much more dialed (except for the air forks), as they don't rely on the damper for support. The spring is what holds you up, the damper controls the motion. Oil volume can be used to adjust progression, but there is always preload on the springs, the rate never drops, and there is no unsupported travel.

The media shills and sponsored riders praise Charger 3 because they get paid to.
The general public just drinks the kool aid they are handed.

BUTTER CUPS! :LOL: :LOL:
 
Charger 3 does not get good reviews from anyone who knows what they are talking about.

The new RS stuff is a step back; really stiff dampers to make up for really soft air springs due to even larger negative chambers. This leads to harshness from the damper, compounded by a massive wall of progression from the air spring because you have to run such higher pressures. Feels nice and "plush" off the top for shop floor appeal, but rides like crap. We're back to original Debonair with 10-15mm of unsupported travel off the top, this makes the fork ride deeper in the travel, and closer to the dreaded compression wall. The new RS air spring looks just like the Vorsprung Luftkappe on the dyno.
I'm not sure your interpretation is right here. Are you suggesting that the "good old days" of air springs with virtually no negative volume were our golden years? Really soft air springs are NOT driven by negative volume, they're driven by the opposite...too little negative volume leads to a crazy stiff initial stroke that falls off, essentially requiring low pressures for sensitivity and contributing to a hammock-y feel where the fork dives through the midstroke, then hits a progression wall. Negative spring volume increases are the only thing that has been able to bring air springs into any semblance of competition in feel with a coil spring, and forks with dual positive chambers are taking that progress further.

Vorsprung is lauded as one of the more ingenious suspension brands around, for good reason. They created products that allowed people to leap beyond the low negative volume air springs that companies were providing to find a more supportive midstroke through MORE negative volume. You have to run more pressure, but can run fewer volume spacers and find a more linear progressive spring curve overall.

I'm not an expert, but my sense from others is that the Charger 3 seems to have gone wrong by pursuing simplistic internal adjustments that limit the ability to do custom tuning, kind of like what Fox has done with GRIP2. Let me tell you from experience, the ultra-soft compression tune of the GRIP2 (which can't be re-tuned aside from the base valve) is decidedly NOT the future of suspension in my book...
 
I'm not sure your interpretation is right here. Are you suggesting that the "good old days" of air springs with virtually no negative volume were our golden years? Really soft air springs are NOT driven by negative volume, they're driven by the opposite...too little negative volume leads to a crazy stiff initial stroke that falls off, essentially requiring low pressures for sensitivity and contributing to a hammock-y feel where the fork dives through the midstroke, then hits a progression wall. Negative spring volume increases are the only thing that has been able to bring air springs into any semblance of competition in feel with a coil spring, and forks with dual positive chambers are taking that progress further.
I have an aftermarket air spring in my fork with more negative volume than stock, also a Megneg (which I ended up not using because I couldn't get on with it), but in my experience more negative volume doesn't make as big of a difference to small bump compliance in the real world (!) as some people say.
Sure, you push down on the bars or saddle and go wow, that's so soft and plush! But when you're riding the bike and everything is under sag, the difference is nowhere near as pronounced. To me it feels like the negative spring makes the biggest difference in the kind of travel range where stuff like the tyres are doing most of the work anyways when it comes to absorbing hits, and at the front you're fighting stuff like friction from the bushes and seals. I agree with the unsupported travel thing as well, that travel is almost kind of lost. This was especially noticeable with the Megneg at full negative volume. I kinda like to think of that thing as simply riding higher pressures with "forced sag".
You don't need a massive negative spring to get midstroke support. I mean you do, if you base everything around the "correct" sag.
Just my opinion/experience of course.
 
Ok. Got to wonder why it gets so good review then? Are you just meaning from a service/tuning perspetive? Your opinion is kind of the opposite compared to all reviews I've seen thus far.
Quite a few people who're really good at riding bikes find it a big upgrade in the performance department and call it a really really good fork.
There's a thing I call "Newphoria" where everyone convinces themselves new stuff is better. The more expensive it is the more cognitive dissonance you see.

Back in 2014 it was like living in a parrallel universe. The Pike came out with the Charger 1 damper and everyone was raving about how it was the best fork they'd ever ridden. Reviews were lavishing praise. I found them absolutely awful. They were so harsh they'd buzz your hands numb on my rocky terrain. Preloaded shim stacks with big bypass made them wallow and spike. My 2005 Manitou Nixon was better in every way.

It took over 6 months before people were willing to come out and say they were struggling with setup and their Pike's just never felt good. That eventually gave way to threads like "I really hate my Pike". The truth takes a long time to come out.

What have Rockshox done with the Charger 3? Exactly the same. Preloaded shim stack with big bypass. Can't vacuum bleed them either so service is a messy PITA.

Charger 2.1 was much much better but Charger 2.1 is still harsh and wallowy.

In my opinion Charger 3 has been designed this way solely to work with the low force actuators on the Flight Attendant. Allowing one LSC dial to give a big increase in damping and allowing HSC to be a low force dial moving a stepped plunger. But doing that has compromised the entire thing.
 
...
What have Rockshox done with the Charger 3? Exactly the same. Preloaded shim stack with big bypass. Can't vacuum bleed them either so service is a messy PITA.

Charger 2.1 was much much better but Charger 2.1 is still harsh and wallowy.
...
Ok, but then what 170 fork you think actually work as it whould without revalving it? nothing?
 
Ok, but then what 170 fork you think actually work as it whould without revalving it? nothing?
Everything will work. It just depends how well you want it to work.

The Mezzer is beyond all the others for spring and damper. It's also the only one that can be easily revalved to an amazing result. The others all need modifications.
 
The gap in understanding suspension between someone like Dougal and someone writing a pinkbike review is massive, and that's putting it lightly. Most reviewers just don't have a clue and especially compared to a suspension tech like Dougal. Reviewers also tend to go on about how great something new is, then when the new iteration of it comes out, all of a sudden it is addressing problems with the previous (current) version that they never mentioned. I can near guarantee when the Charger 3.1 or 4 or whatever comes out, they are all of a sudden gonna be talking about how harsh the previous iteration was and the new one improves on it.

Forgetting the reviewers and engineers, even, I feel like most riders don't have a clue how to set things up or distinguish differences between the way things feel. I know some really good riders who know next to nothing about how suspension works or don't know what a damper is, so being a good rider doesn't have anything to do with it (which is also why elite level riders work with suspension techs). So you need to consider that being a publication reviewer or good rider has nothing to do with actually understanding the engineering behind the way a fork performs.

There are also plenty of complaints about the small bump compliance and tracking of the new gen Charger 3 forks, even an entire thread on the subject here for the new Lyrik.
Totally different markets, 99% of riders don't care how it was made, how it charts on a dyno, or if its easy to tune, they care how it performs on a trail. The new Zeb performs insanely well in real world conditions and that's what matters. Nobody can ride one and say it sucks, theyd be lying, maybe you can get a different fork and mod it to feel better but out of the box the new Zeb is probably the best out there.
 
Everything will work. It just depends how well you want it to work.

The Mezzer is beyond all the others for spring and damper. It's also the only one that can be easily revalved to an amazing result. The others all need modifications.
Genuinely curious - from a tuner perspective, how do you see the Mezzer spring + damper as comparing to what Ohlins is doing? Ohlins seems to overdamp their forks for the average rider, but they're also easily tunable, and the air spring seems to work extremely well (happens to be extremely similar to the Mezzer). I'm not familiar with the internals side of things though, so curious where limitations or tradeoffs between the two may arise.
 
Nobody can ride one and say it sucks, theyd be lying, maybe you can get a different fork and mod it to feel better but out of the box the new Zeb is probably the best out there.
I can. It sucks, it really sucks compared to the Mezzer Pro and Ohlinx RXF36 m.2 coil I had, by a wide margin. It's either harsh or doesn't stand up to its travel, small bump compliance is medicore at best. Hell even the new Lyrik feels better IMO. I paid for one, bought it, rode it, hate it, and will be getting rid of it when my Mezzer comes in. Is it absolutely terrible? No, but there are much better forks out there and it sucks in comparison to them.

Also, you can't ignore the engineering behind the fork, the notes Dougal makes matters because it's how the fork actually functions, it's objective and not subject to riders not knowing how to set it up or how it feels, that can't be ignored. The results on the dyno show how it's going to perform. The fact people aren't in tune with the way it feels or don't care, which represents a lot of riders, doesn't mean it's good especially when there are better options. The fact people don't care about dyno plots doesn't change what they show or what the end result is.
 
I can. It sucks, it really sucks compared to the Mezzer Pro and Ohlinx RXF36 m.2 coil I had, by a wide margin. It's either harsh or doesn't stand up to its travel, small bump compliance is medicore at best. Hell even the new Lyrik feels better IMO. I paid for one, bought it, rode it, hate it, and will be getting rid of it when my Mezzer comes in. Is it absolutely terrible? No, but there are much better forks out there and it sucks in comparison to them.

Also, you can't ignore the engineering behind the fork, the notes Dougal makes matters because it's how the fork actually functions, it's objective and not subject to riders not knowing how to set it up or how it feels, that can't be ignored. The results on the dyno show how it's going to perform. The fact people aren't in tune with the way it feels or don't care, which represents a lot of riders, doesn't mean it's good especially when there are better options. The fact people don't care about dyno plots doesn't change what they show or what the end result is.
Are you actually talking about the 2023 zeb? not seen anyone else say with your opinion ". It's either harsh or doesn't stand up to its travel, small bump compliance is medicore at best." but everybody says exacly that about the -2022 zeb. 2022 zeb with the debonair+ air shaft may be a different story.
 
Totally different markets, 99% of riders don't care how it was made, how it charts on a dyno, or if its easy to tune, they care how it performs on a trail. The new Zeb performs insanely well in real world conditions and that's what matters. Nobody can ride one and say it sucks, theyd be lying, maybe you can get a different fork and mod it to feel better but out of the box the new Zeb is probably the best out there.
So like all of a sudden RS just magically figured out how to make a suspension fork in 2023 MY?
 
Are you actually talking about the 2023 zeb? not seen anyone else say with your opinion ". It's either harsh or doesn't stand up to its travel, small bump compliance is medicore at best." but everybody says exacly that about the -2022 zeb. 2022 zeb with the debonair+ air shaft may be a different story.
2023 Zeb Ultimate 29 @ 170

I'm not saying it's abysmally awful, that designation goes to certain others I've had over the years, but it isn't great either and it's certainly not the best out there. It's mediocre, there is worse but there is also a lot better. I also read plenty of reviews on the 2023 RS products that mentioned small bump compliance was bad and/or it was harsh, one even commented that they had more hand fatigue than with any other current fork. Some reviewers suggested running more sag than others, reducing it down to around 30%, which IMO is kindof ridiculous.

I'm fairly sensitive to suspension feel. I have nerve issues in one of my hands that makes hand fatigue a lot worse for me than others, but I also ride a lot of really natural, eroded, rooty/rocky terrain that can be steep at times and is usually fairly fast. So I have this careful balance of needing the fork to be smooth and reduce fatigue, but also track well and stand up to it's travel without being too harsh. If I rode flow trails with the Zeb all day I'd be fine (and I have), but the moment it gets into anything remotely rough (rock armoring, square edges, etc), it feels profoundly worse than the Ohlins and Mezzers I've had before at the same travel settings, not only fatiguing my hands more but also not tracking as well. If I dial back the pressure some then that helps, but then it rides too low in the stroke especially when it gets steeper.

I get along OK with the 2023 Lyrik on my trailbike, but I ride that bike entirely differently because it's a trailbike. For a 170 fork on a big bike the Zeb just doesn't compare to the others I've tried, the Mezzer and Ohlins are still the standard there for me. Admittedly, I have not tried the new Fox stuff yet. Saying the Zeb is decent, I can give it that, but "probably the best out there", nope, not even close IMO.
 
Genuinely curious - from a tuner perspective, how do you see the Mezzer spring + damper as comparing to what Ohlins is doing? Ohlins seems to overdamp their forks for the average rider, but they're also easily tunable, and the air spring seems to work extremely well (happens to be extremely similar to the Mezzer). I'm not familiar with the internals side of things though, so curious where limitations or tradeoffs between the two may arise.
Ohlins missed the boat on their two stage air-spring. The second stage is too small and comes in too late, it's basically a pneumatic bottom-out bumper that doesn't function at all like the Mezzer IRT. It's too firm off the top and also incredibly expensive for the service kits.

I reconfigure the Ohlins air spring by changing volumes with great results. But that's an engineering project in itself (both making new and modifying existing parts).

The TTX22 and STX22 dampers were also a mess. Excessive damping, very narrow adjuster ranges that couldn't even put rebound and compression in range. These were truly awful to ride. I was able to fix it with custom pistons and reshimming. Ohlins instead reduced the diameter of the dampers (TTX18) to bring damping forces within range.

I've gotta agree with Rulezman. Ohlins can't make good forks. The amount I have to charge people to turn an RXF36 into a good performing fork is almost embarassing, but that's how much work is involved: Ohlins RXF34 and RXF36 STX22 & TTX22 Service, Tuning & Upgrades | Shockcraft
 
Totally different markets, 99% of riders don't care how it was made, how it charts on a dyno, or if its easy to tune, they care how it performs on a trail. The new Zeb performs insanely well in real world conditions and that's what matters. Nobody can ride one and say it sucks, theyd be lying, maybe you can get a different fork and mod it to feel better but out of the box the new Zeb is probably the best out there.
If you think a fork with a heavily preloaded damper piston performs insanely well, then I'm going to have to ask. What else have you ridden?
Have you ever experienced good suspension?

Because most people never have.
 
It was interesting comparing my coil avalanche lyrik to my '22 zeb. In short, it's real close. The lyrik is so well controlled, supple, compliant, etc. The zeb is not, even with diaz shim mod and secus, the damper holds it back a lot, but the stiffer chassis lets you pound through some chunk....real close to the lyrik. You can feel the stiffness difference helping you pound through the chunk...but you can also feel the harshness of the damper causing it to bounce off of stuff/deflect/spike in the travel more, so end result is real close. It's a lot better than when I got it, with the original F-ed up air spring and real harsh valving...but not nearly as good as it could be, given the chassis size. I've since done further significant modding to the damping, but I haven't been able to test it out. Might be able to next month in AZ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: niklasdr
21 - 40 of 111 Posts