Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
21 - 40 of 40 Posts
Interesting. I am not quite sure I follow your plan but then again I'm not exactly a bike tech wizard. i.e. not sure what you're looking at very high end / durable road bike components and large chain rings for a very entry level commuter / MTB.

Basically, when I ordered my Marlin 7, I couldn't get the XXL size for a Marlin 8 so the bike shop set about building me a "Marlin 7.8". So, 32t front chain ring; 11 speed rear derailleur,11 - 51T cassette, and shifter; and a Rockshox Recon Silver RL front fork. It's also got the kovee TLR wheels and will get Maxxis Ikon tires which will be set up tubeless from the shop.

All this to say, what exactly are you going for with your Marlin 5? Are you trying to convert it into more of a faster for road commuter bike with the comfort of XC geometry? Or do you do off roading stuff too like I do? I may get a second set of wheels for the Marlin 7 down the line, and have one set of tires with more commuter focused tires and another with trail tires. Right now I'll split the difference and go for XC tires.

With the money you're spending, my thoughts would be to move to a deore setup for your drivetrain.
The m4100 and m5100 stuff is nice. Pretty sure you can do a 2X crankset with an 11 speed cassette. Pretty sure the CS5100 has the 11 - 42 option for the cassette. I'd have to double check the parts but you'd get a lot of range with this set up. The PROBLEM here is that I THINK the 2x crank is 26 / 36? Gunna look it up... Ya. FC-M4100 with 26t / 36t chainrings. So, you'd get GREAT lower range for hills and trails but you'd probably lose a bit of top end from a 42T - 12T gear.
Let's figure it out: 36 - 11 = 3.27, which is pretty quick on a 29" wheel.
42 - 12t = 3.5, which is faster. You won't get faster gears but you WILL get a much MUCH better drivetrain. The tourney stuff is pretty low end...

(My set up will only have a 1 x 11 with a 32t - 11t fastest gear, but it is more of an XC / go everywhere set up)

IF you're curious about those deore parts, I can send you the part numbers but I really don't know that this is what you're after. Not sure if there are other 2x crank options that would work? If you went with the 11 speed 11 - 42t cassette, to get it to work with the Rear Derailleur i.e. chain wrap capacity, you have to have a front crankset with no more than a 10t difference between the smaller and larger ring. AND it would need to work with an 11 speed chain.


Do you have the Suntour fork on the bike?


I was wondering why you would swap out the wheel but I guess the freehub body on a 7 speed isn't big enough for an 8, 9, 10, 11 speed rear drivetrain? Have you checked out bicyclewheelwarehouse? Bicycle Wheel Warehouse

It seems like a lot of money to put into a bike like that BUT if you like the way the frame fits and feels, and if it's worth it to you, then it will be awesome.
 
Discussion starter · #22 ·
Probably worth doing some measuring and make up some drawings.
my marlin 5 is a 2x that I’m converting to 1x.
I prefer a 36 or 38T as chainring, but based on what was said above, that might not fit. It may fit if using a wide or boost crank set, and use some spaces, but you’d have to check the impact on the chainline.
also keep in mind that if something has an exact fit, it probably doesn’t, due to tolerances and flexing/play of the various components.
 
Interesting. I am not quite sure I follow your plan but then again I'm not exactly a bike tech wizard. i.e. not sure what you're looking at very high end / durable road bike components and large chain rings for a very entry level commuter / MTB.
Basically I have been riding mountain bikes all my life since mountain bikes were new and kind of "replaced" 10 speeds. They always have the same problems. They work ok when they are new, then the chain starts slipping worse with every passing day. I've actually never in 30 years of riding had a bike tech tell me I should replace a cassette or a chain ring or even a chain for that matter. This was long before there was an internet where I could look it up myself. After so long I would just say ok, guess I need a new bike. Well I dont want to buy a new bike over and over that eventually develops the same problems. Especially with more and more expensive bikes. I hope to actually fix the problem instead of "just get a new bike."

I always ride in the highest gear on all my bikes. I haven't had to down shift on a bike for 30 years now. Yes I am faster than everyone else out there usually and this is why, but I feel strong enough to ride a little higher than that. So I wanted to upgrade to a bigger chainring. 53t was the biggest I saw.

So as far as what I am trying to do. I want more durable parts that will not start to break and slip after 3 months of riding. I ride about 100 miles a month when the weather is warm. Titanium is supposed to help with that so I wanted to give it a try instead of buying a new bike with a drivetrain made out of the same flimsy metal but maybe a few more teeth on the gear. I have some frame limitations i.e. max 42T chainring. So I would go from 42T - 12T to 42T - 11T. Still the fastest, but working the legs a little more is the plan. Also with everything titanium the parts will not wear down and go in the useless bike pile with all the other bikes after a couple months or maybe a year.

I also plan to put the bike on a boat where the saltwater will wear down the drivetrain even faster. So all titanium drivetrain, and if that works upgrade to a titanium frame somewhere down the line. A new bike with the same junk metal is gonna cause the same drivetrain problems I have had with literally every other bike. This is already my third bike in like 5 years I would rather use that money to replace the components than an entire bike where only the drivetrain is broken. And over time one day I will replace the entire frame and have a full titanium drivetrain with a full titanium frame instead of yet another bike with exactly the same problems as the last bike. Then I will no longer buy new bikes because of wear, just replace the component(s) that have worn down.

Basically, when I ordered my Marlin 7, I couldn't get the XXL size for a Marlin 8 so the bike shop set about building me a "Marlin 7.8". So, 32t front chain ring; 11 speed rear derailleur,11 - 51T cassette, and shifter; and a Rockshox Recon Silver RL front fork. It's also got the kovee TLR wheels and will get Maxxis Ikon tires which will be set up tubeless from the shop.
I am certain I wont be happy with a 32T chain ring. The middle chain ring is around there and I never use it I hate it. If I could I would have a 1x11 with the 53T on the front, but I think I would need a special frame to accommodate that. Which I am not against, but I will first upgrade the drivetrain for next season as the drivetrain is already as bad as the bike it replaced after only a year.

With the money you're spending, my thoughts would be to move to a deore setup for your drivetrain.
The only problem with that is I will have spent $1000 on a new bike, and be in exactly the same place after a year. This is why I would rather spend $1000 on a top quality drivetrain instead of an entire new bike. Then after a couple years spend $1000 on a new titanium frame instead of another $1000 or more bike. All of that money is going into making my bike better. No more of this new bike every year crap.

range for hills and trails but you'd probably lose a bit of top end from a 42T - 12T gear.
Let's figure it out: 36 - 11 = 3.27, which is pretty quick on a 29" wheel.
42 - 12t = 3.5, which is faster. You won't get faster gears but you WILL get a much MUCH better drivetrain. The tourney stuff is pretty low end...

(My set up will only have a 1 x 11 with a 32t - 11t fastest gear, but it is more of an XC / go everywhere set up)
There is no way I wanna go down from 42t - 12t. My legs are just stronger than this. I go up hills in higher than 32t - 11t.

If you went with the 11 speed 11 - 42t cassette, to get it to work with the Rear Derailleur i.e. chain wrap capacity, you have to have a front crankset with no more than a 10t difference between the smaller and larger ring. AND it would need to work with an 11 speed chain.

Do you have the Suntour fork on the bike?
I am already planning to get a better derailleur, but I would essentially only be doing one tooth higher than what I am doing now. 11T instead of 12T. I am still using the same fork the website says.

SR Suntour XCE 28, coil spring, preload, G2 Geometry w/51mm offset on 29ers, 100mm travel (13.5: 80mm travel)

I was wondering why you would swap out the wheel but I guess the freehub body on a 7 speed isn't big enough for an 8, 9, 10, 11 speed rear drivetrain? Have you checked out bicyclewheelwarehouse? Bicycle Wheel Warehouse
Yea the wheel is only 7 8 9 speed, the next wheel up is 10 11 speed, then after that 11 12 speed. Its about $175 I think which isnt too bad.

It seems like a lot of money to put into a bike like that BUT if you like the way the frame fits and feels, and if it's worth it to you, then it will be awesome.
Yea it would just be new bike, same problems after a year. I did the "get the new bike" thing for so many years its like ok, I dont want a new bike, I want to fix exactly what the problem is. It seems like bike mechanics just didnt know. In 30 years none have ever mentioned replacing the cassette or chainring. I dont need a new everything and the old bike goes in the trash. If I knew about upgrading components in all these years, I could have had a full custom titanium frame bike WITH a full titanium drivetrain years ago. But I kept buying new bikes with the same problems after about year.
 
Probably worth doing some measuring and make up some drawings.
my marlin 5 is a 2x that I’m converting to 1x.
I prefer a 36 or 38T as chainring, but based on what was said above, that might not fit. It may fit if using a wide or boost crank set, and use some spaces, but you’d have to check the impact on the chainline.
also keep in mind that if something has an exact fit, it probably doesn’t, due to tolerances and flexing/play of the various components.
Ya I am researching the same bike. From what I have seen if you want a bigger chainring you will probably have to get another 3x chainring with 38 or so teeth on the outside rings, because inside has a frame limitation of 32T from the website here


Have a look at something like this

It would be 3x instead of 1x, but you simply cant fit a 1x 38T chainring on that bike according to the website. Your biggest chainring is already 42T so you could just use that ring (3 on the right gear), then go to a lower gear on the left hand side (maybe start around 5 or so and see what you like.
 
OK, I'm tracking with you.


Stupid question: Are you fine tuning your indexing as you ride? Or, is your power output simply so high that it is stretching the chain? I am told that a stretching chain will wear down cogs.
If a bike isn't shifting right after a couple of months of use, I'd check the indexing. I'd also check the freehub / freehub body. I had a freehub body that almost blew on me. It was skipping and the chain was dragging. No fun.

You're making me a bit nervous to go to a 1x 11 set up -on my new bike- from my 3 x 9 on my current one. The 3 x 9 shifts great and has been durable for my needs, but the bike is simply too small for me...

The gearing you are saying you use to climb hills leads me to believe that you're riding primarily road on a MTB. The logical thing to do would be to suggest a road or gravel bike because these bikes are designed and equipped for much faster gearing. I SHOULD probably be using a gravel bike for how I like to ride but I just don't care for the geometry / aesthetic so I wanted an XC bike. I suppose you are in the exact same scenario.

Hmmm.

My inclination would be to suggest looking into commuter bike frames. It would be ideal to find something in boost spacing that can accommodate a 40t chainring so you could have a 40t to 10t max gearing. I am not sure if a bike with these specs even exists. The trouble with mountain bikes is that even XC bikes are geared with the expectation that the rider will be out in the woods and going up very steep, technical climbs. The kind of thing where anyone would need a 32 - 51t gearing to execute it.

42T to 11t would be pretty fast. Not MASSIVELY faster but a bit faster.

In the end, you are right: Better just to replace worn components, not the whole bike. The tourney stuff is probably not as durable as Deore or higher level components. With your power output, I think that looking into components made with better materials is probably your best bet. I do think you can find components that are suitable to your needs but then we're back at the compatibility issue that you brought up.

So, maybe do some preliminary looking and see what is available for frames? It would be great to find a frame that can accommodate the kind of drivetrain that would be suitable to your very specific needs.
 
Discussion starter · #26 ·
I think you’re doing the right thing by going for high end durable durable components. And I think you probably were unlucky with the people serving you, because one of my friends rides a tiring bike for commute. He started doing that 25 years ago, and even then he only had parts replaced. Back then it was possible to crave single cassette disks, soo the most used ones he replaced with titanium ones.
 
I think you’re doing the right thing by going for high end durable durable components. And I think you probably were unlucky with the people serving you, because one of my friends rides a tiring bike for commute. He started doing that 25 years ago, and even then he only had parts replaced. Back then it was possible to crave single cassette disks, soo the most used ones he replaced with titanium ones.
I agree. If he can find parts that will fit on the Marlin frame -and if he likes how it fits- then this is probably the best course of action. It is certainly a very VERY unique use case scenario.

Trek 'SAYS' a 34t chainring is the max size for a 2x crankset and they equip a marlin frame with a 36t / 22t crankset for one of their models -I think the Marlin5 Gen 2?- then it is entirely that the frame will have enough clearance for a bigger large chainring on a 3x system than what is advertised. A 44t chainring could make a difference. Or a 48t one would be even better...
I think the narrower the chain gets, the less clearance there is.

But yeah.

42t - 12t is a 3.5 ratio.
44t - 11t is a 4.0 ratio.

Now THIS will be noticeably faster...

I'll be playin' it cool with my 32t - 11t max gear lol....
 
I agree. If he can find parts that will fit on the Marlin frame -and if he likes how it fits- then this is probably the best course of action. It is certainly a very VERY unique use case scenario.

Trek 'SAYS' a 34t chainring is the max size for a 2x crankset and they equip a marlin frame with a 36t / 22t crankset for one of their models -I think the Marlin5 Gen 2?- then it is entirely that the frame will have enough clearance for a bigger large chainring on a 3x system than what is advertised. A 44t chainring could make a difference. Or a 48t one would be even better...
I think the narrower the chain gets, the less clearance there is.

But yeah.

42t - 12t is a 3.5 ratio.
44t - 11t is a 4.0 ratio.

Now THIS will be noticeably faster...

I'll be playin' it cool with my 32t - 11t max gear lol....
yea man that is just what I am lookin for. I will probably buy the parts myself and just take them down to the mechanic like can you put these on. The only thing I worry about with the bigger cassette is something weird with the new derailleur.

Stupid question: Are you fine tuning your indexing as you ride? Or, is your power output simply so high that it is stretching the chain? I am told that a stretching chain will wear down cogs.
Eventually the chain stretches out or pieces of metal are literally shaving off the cassette and chainring. So a new bike will just develop the same problems. If you buy a bike and throw it in the garage only riding occasionally you might not notice for a while, depending on how much you ride. But with heavy use it will become noticeable by the one year mark.

I looked at a couple polished titanium frames that look nice but I would have to call to see the type of chainrings they could accommodate. I mostly ride urban pavements and paved trails. I also like the way mountain bikes sit upright instead of leaned over head down like a road bike. Also the road bikes I have seen almost all have smaller chainrings and I am not really looking for anything smaller. That ratio increase sounds nice though with a new cassette. I need to find some money by next season but if so I will upgrade my bike and hopefully the experience will be better than "chain slipping... BUY A NEW BIKE!"
 
Eventually the chain stretches out or pieces of metal are literally shaving off the cassette and chainring. So a new bike will just develop the same problems. If you buy a bike and throw it in the garage only riding occasionally you might not notice for a while, depending on how much you ride. But with heavy use it will become noticeable by the one year mark.
K, forgive me if you know this stuff already but a number of things have occurred to me as probable causes:

1) Usually, with a new bike, the cables and housings 'settle in' to position so as the cable stretches, the derailleur goes out of alignment which causes the chain to rub on components. It's typical to have cables stretch over time with use.

I typically play with the barrel adjuster on my shift pod if I notice the shifts becoming sluggish in one direction or another. I make sure that my shifting is optimal before I ride and if I can't get it right myself, I'll have a good bike tech take a look. I did some modifications this summer and it turns out that I accidentally had swapped shift cable and brake cable housing. If I had kept riding the bike I would have worn out components needlessly fast but I swapped the housings around and the bike started performing as one would expect. Nice, snappy, accurate shifts. It kind of creeps me out because sometimes I can't even feel / hear the shift....


2) Chains do stretch and they should be replaced when they stretch. It's best to get a chain guage and measure the length of the chain, swapping it out before it can cause excessive wear on the parts. Now this begs the question: WHY is the chain stretching out so fast?


3) Shifting: How is your gear usage? Are you cross chaining? (Cross chaining is using the large chain ring with large cogs, or small chainring with small cogs) Cross chaining can cause components to wear because the chain, while under load, is not at an optimum angle so it's making contact with other mechanical parts.

Are you shifting under load? Is there a lot of grinding / noise while shifting?

While riding, do you 'grind it out' and use excessive force to power the bike or are you using your gears and a higher cadence to generate power output without excessive force? Just because you 'can' do something doesn't mean you 'should' do it and I certainly have been getting used to 'spinning up hills' instead of 'grinding it out'.

The rule with shifting is to 'let off' the power on the crank while moving gears. Surge forward, and then pedal lightly while the chain is guided onto the next cog. Using a front derailleur is a whole other game but from what you're saying, you don't use it much and the bike lives on the largest chainring.

Generally, parts should be replaced as they wear, and they will wear MUCH more slowly if the bike is properly serviced and maintained. Since getting back into cycling, I have been amassing a bike tool collection, watching videos, and learning how to do maintenance myself.
 
K, forgive me if you know this stuff already but a number of things have occurred to me as probable causes:

1) Usually, with a new bike, the cables and housings 'settle in' to position so as the cable stretches, the derailleur goes out of alignment which causes the chain to rub on components. It's typical to have cables stretch over time with use.
I really dont think so. It is a regular occurrence for so many years I just thought it was a defect with bikes in general. And it kind of is. The drivetrains are made of junk metal like nobody really rides the bike and notices the junk metal grinding away like aluminum foil.

I typically play with the barrel adjuster on my shift pod if I notice the shifts becoming sluggish in one direction or another. I make sure that my shifting is optimal before I ride and if I can't get it right myself, I'll have a good bike tech take a look. I did some modifications this summer and it turns out that I accidentally had swapped shift cable and brake cable housing. If I had kept riding the bike I would have worn out components needlessly fast but I swapped the housings around and the bike started performing as one would expect. Nice, snappy, accurate shifts. It kind of creeps me out because sometimes I can't even feel / hear the shift....
Yea a lot of techs ask shifting questions and simply no. I havent shifted at all. Not once. In fact the only time the bike was shifted was when the mechanic at the bike shop did it.

2) Chains do stretch and they should be replaced when they stretch. It's best to get a chain guage and measure the length of the chain, swapping it out before it can cause excessive wear on the parts. Now this begs the question: WHY is the chain stretching out so fast?
They have some little thing that checks to see if the chain is stretched out, but they said it wasnt. However despite this the chain is skipping quite a bit. I describe the problem in painstaking detail and the look at me like they have never heard anything like it before. They basically run through all the gears and say "oh man it looks like its fine to me, let me put a little oil on there." The oil makes it worse.

3) Shifting: How is your gear usage? Are you cross chaining? (Cross chaining is using the large chain ring with large cogs, or small chainring with small cogs) Cross chaining can cause components to wear because the chain, while under load, is not at an optimum angle so it's making contact with other mechanical parts.

Are you shifting under load? Is there a lot of grinding / noise while shifting?

While riding, do you 'grind it out' and use excessive force to power the bike or are you using your gears and a higher cadence to generate power output without excessive force? Just because you 'can' do something doesn't mean you 'should' do it and I certainly have been getting used to 'spinning up hills' instead of 'grinding it out'.

The rule with shifting is to 'let off' the power on the crank while moving gears. Surge forward, and then pedal lightly while the chain is guided onto the next cog. Using a front derailleur is a whole other game but from what you're saying, you don't use it much and the bike lives on the largest chainring.

Generally, parts should be replaced as they wear, and they will wear MUCH more slowly if the bike is properly serviced and maintained. Since getting back into cycling, I have been amassing a bike tool collection, watching videos, and learning how to do maintenance myself.
Always in the highest gear so not cross chaining at all. Not one time. "Grind it out" ? naw I dont ride turned up. Basically I am just pedaling. Completely not shifting so it is not a shifting problem. From what I understand the cassette, chain, and chainring, which is cheap $20 metal, is shredded like aluminum foil. I can see the shredding once I knew what to look for. It slowly starts skipping, and each skip grinds off more metal and the chain is having more and more problem catching the teeth as I pedal. Nobody changes gears but the bike tech. And I have to wipe off all the oil he puts on there cause that makes it worse.

I think I will eventually start doing maintenance myself, but I have to pull money together for parts before I can buy the tool kit as well as the maintenance stand. Even if I can pull some money together, I have some other things I have to do first. I saw a stand for $100+ and a mechanic set for $100+ and all the videos are on youtube. Kind of a big undertaking but its getting tiring people just have never seemed to have heard about this situation that has happened on every bike for the last 30 years. It seems like maybe they did some kind of maintenance training but dont really ride bikes themselves. Anything beyond what the maintenance book said and they are completely lost.

The "new bike" is great until I buy it. I buy it, the problems start, and "oh thats just an entry level bike, get a new bike and spend more this time." Then same problem. All the gears seem made of junk metal unless you hand pick parts that are made of stainless steel or titanium. And I am guessing that is the problem. Hopefully I will know for sure next season though.
 
I really dont think so. It is a regular occurrence for so many years I just thought it was a defect with bikes in general. And it kind of is. The drivetrains are made of junk metal like nobody really rides the bike and notices the junk metal grinding away like aluminum foil.
I think I know what is going on.

The bike you want: a single speed bike with XC geometry and one REALLY fast gear for road riding.

The bike you have: an entry level multi-gear commuter / fun MTB with XC geometry.

You simply are not using it the way it is designed to work. Not doing maintenance only accelerates the wear but, you are pedaling the hell out of the bike in the hardest gear -Slooowww cadence and maximum force - and this destroys the components quickly. Have you tried strength sports like powerlifting because you should.

Most people try to pedal lightly but quickly and use their gears to accelerate, just like a car. It wears the components down FAR more slowly because of using more than one chainring and cog and using way less force to generate the same - or more- power.

Typically, I would accelerate. 2 - 2. 2 - 5. 3 - 5. 3 - 7 on my 3 x 9. I pedal until I an pedalling FAST and then switch gears and repeat the same thing over. If you rode this way you would wear parts way less and accelerate far faster.

But to each their own, I guess.

If you can get the titanium components installed, let us know how it goes. I am extremely curious.
 
I think I know what is going on.

The bike you want: a single speed bike with XC geometry and one REALLY fast gear for road riding.

The bike you have: an entry level multi-gear commuter / fun MTB with XC geometry.

You simply are not using it the way it is designed to work. Not doing maintenance only accelerates the wear but, you are pedaling the hell out of the bike in the hardest gear -Slooowww cadence and maximum force - and this destroys the components quickly. Have you tried strength sports like powerlifting because you should.

Most people try to pedal lightly but quickly and use their gears to accelerate, just like a car. It wears the components down FAR more slowly because of using more than one chainring and cog and using way less force to generate the same - or more- power.

Typically, I would accelerate. 2 - 2. 2 - 5. 3 - 5. 3 - 7 on my 3 x 9. I pedal until I an pedalling FAST and then switch gears and repeat the same thing over. If you rode this way you would wear parts way less and accelerate far faster.

But to each their own, I guess.

If you can get the titanium components installed, let us know how it goes. I am extremely curious.
Heard it before. Yup, it must be my fault somehow, buy a new bike. Fancy talk for "I dont ride bikes I dont really know." This bike was gonna solve all my problems BEFORE I bought it. AFTER I bought it, now its entry level, it sucks, you arent doing it right, buy a new bike. I should try powerlifting because weight lifting... What could possibly go wrong with that. How does muscle work again? You get the surgery and look cute right?

Basically the $20 dollar junk metal failed. How could that possibly happen? I must be doing something wrong! Again! Personally I think most people get surgery and cut your muscle out, then you can only ride for 5 minutes in a granny gear, so you dont know. I guess that is part of the problem. Can you figure out any other way to blame me again? Is it meat time yet?

Anyway just frustrated. I will try to figure something else out thanks for even trying to help.
 
Heard it before. Yup, it must be my fault somehow, buy a new bike. Fancy talk for "I dont ride bikes I dont really know." This bike was gonna solve all my problems BEFORE I bought it. AFTER I bought it, now its entry level, it sucks, you arent doing it right, buy a new bike. I should try powerlifting because weight lifting... What could possibly go wrong with that. How does muscle work again? You get the surgery and look cute right?

Basically the $20 dollar junk metal failed. How could that possibly happen? I must be doing something wrong! Again! Personally I think most people get surgery and cut your muscle out, then you can only ride for 5 minutes in a granny gear, so you dont know. I guess that is part of the problem. Can you figure out any other way to blame me again? Is it meat time yet?

Anyway just frustrated. I will try to figure something else out thanks for even trying to help.
Hey. I do want to clarify the powerlifting comment because I think you took it the wrong way.


Based on what you're saying, you're REALLY strong. Abnormally so. I'm simply saying that if you try powerlifting, I bet you'll put up some very big (read: competitive) numbers and there's a chance that you might be able to have a career as a competitive athlete in this discipline.
I'd also encourage you to get a road bike and enter a race. I'm really curious how well you'd do and maybe there would be a future for you here too. Let us know.

I think most people use their easier gears because they simply aren't strong enough to power through like you do.

Anyhow, I hope you find a solution that works for how you want to ride.

Cheers

-p
 
Heard it before. Yup, it must be my fault somehow, buy a new bike. Fancy talk for "I dont ride bikes I dont really know." This bike was gonna solve all my problems BEFORE I bought it. AFTER I bought it, now its entry level, it sucks, you arent doing it right, buy a new bike. I should try powerlifting because weight lifting... What could possibly go wrong with that. How does muscle work again? You get the surgery and look cute right?

Basically the $20 dollar junk metal failed. How could that possibly happen? I must be doing something wrong! Again! Personally I think most people get surgery and cut your muscle out, then you can only ride for 5 minutes in a granny gear, so you dont know. I guess that is part of the problem. Can you figure out any other way to blame me again? Is it meat time yet?

Anyway just frustrated. I will try to figure something else out thanks for even trying to help.

Have you seen bikes like this??


Maybe this would work better? Maybe titanium parts are available in a gearing you would like?
Just a thought.
 
Titanium has great uses ,gears aren't one of them. Steel is better and a lot cheaper. To get the most life out of a drivetrain is pretty easy, clean and lube the chain often ,replace it when gets worn. Replace the cassette and chain rings when they wear. I get 700 ,800 miles out a chain double to triple that out of a cassette. As to buying "upgraded parts with the idea of moving them to the next bike, that doesn't really work out. What mostly happens is that you decide to get a new bike and spend enough to get already upgraded parts, plus who wants to put used parts on a new bike?
 
Titanium has great uses ,gears aren't one of them. Steel is better and a lot cheaper. To get the most life out of a drivetrain is pretty easy, clean and lube the chain often ,replace it when gets worn. Replace the cassette and chain rings when they wear. I get 700 ,800 miles out a chain double to triple that out of a cassette. As to buying "upgraded parts with the idea of moving them to the next bike, that doesn't really work out. What mostly happens is that you decide to get a new bike and spend enough to get already upgraded parts, plus who wants to put used parts on a new bike?
Yeah, titanium is strong for its weight, but it's pretty soft from a wear-resistance standpoint, making it bad for gears. They won't fold or break, but they probably won't last very long otherwise.

I don't know why @armel.peel is buying multi-geared bikes if he never shifts. A singlespeed faux track bike or hardtail makes a lot more sense and it would be easier to replace that one cog than a cassette and there are probably quality options available (Wolftooth, etc,) that might minimize the wear and breakage, better than what's available in 7-8-9 and 10-spd cassettes, and much cheaper, too.

And, if we're talking Marlin-level bike, there just aren't a lot of good drivetrain upgrades available. They're made with entry-level derailleurs and cassettes, and, most of the time, their "standards" mean you can replace the der and cassette, but cant' really upgrade them.

And, of course, for most mountain bikers, if not bikers generally, "upgrade" is more likely to mean lighter with similar strength and wear resistance, not improvements in strength per se. Better materials and heat-treating in higher end cassettes might result in better strength and wear resistance, but again, why pay to replace 9-10-11 cogs in a cassette when you only use one?
 
Titanium has great uses ,gears aren't one of them. Steel is better and a lot cheaper. To get the most life out of a drivetrain is pretty easy, clean and lube the chain often ,replace it when gets worn. Replace the cassette and chain rings when they wear. I get 700 ,800 miles out a chain double to triple that out of a cassette. As to buying "upgraded parts with the idea of moving them to the next bike, that doesn't really work out. What mostly happens is that you decide to get a new bike and spend enough to get already upgraded parts, plus who wants to put used parts on a new bike?
It's obvious that I don't know much about this. I know that Armel Peel was looking for titanium parts in the hopes that they would be more durable but I don't have any first hand experience with these parts. But yeah, I'm told it's best to buy new and get a bike that has the parts you want from the factory. In my case, trying to find a bike that fits correctly is a headache so it's more complex than that.
RE: Maintenance, even I know about regular maintenance. Making sure the indexing is adjusted, cleaning the chain, replacing worn parts, etc. It's always less expensive to replace things before they wear out.

Yeah, titanium is strong for its weight, but it's pretty soft from a wear-resistance standpoint, making it bad for gears. They won't fold or break, but they probably won't last very long otherwise.

I don't know why @armel.peel is buying multi-geared bikes if he never shifts. A singlespeed faux track bike or hardtail makes a lot more sense and it would be easier to replace that one cog than a cassette and there are probably quality options available (Wolftooth, etc,) that might minimize the wear and breakage, better than what's available in 7-8-9 and 10-spd cassettes, and much cheaper, too.
Ya. I hear that single speed drivetrains are more robust because they don't need to be designed with shifting in mind. Beefier teeth, beefier chain. It would be way better all around.
Are there bikes with a Marlin-eque old school XC geometry that are also single speed bikes? I think this would be, hands down, the best solution.

And, if we're talking Marlin-level bike, there just aren't a lot of good drivetrain upgrades available. They're made with entry-level derailleurs and cassettes, and, most of the time, their "standards" mean you can replace the der and cassette, but cant' really upgrade them.
This is an 'interesting' thing. Perhaps, it costs too much to upgrade the Marlin frame? I've noticed that Shimano makes a Deore level 135mm QR hub with a microspline freehub body. This would make it possible, in theory, to run an XT level drivetrain or higher. Fox has a 1 1/8" steerer tube fork or Cane Creek has headsets that adapt tapered steerer tubes to fit in a straight head tube. So, really, the only thing we have to give up is boost spacing. Unless, of course, we're talking super high end race wheels and top of the line parts.

The question of biking seems to be to be one of 'use case scenario' more than anything. The biking I have access to here is paved bike paths, gravel paths, forest paths, and singletrack. We have to drive 2 1/2 hours for granite. So, XC geometry here is the best 'do everything' / 'go everywhere' kind of bike one can buy.
Here, one would do well with an XC bike, road bike, and a fat bike for the LOONNGGGG winters.


My brother lives on the east coast. For the sort of riding he does, a dual squish trail bike is best. Enduro bikes are too much because they're epic on up and down but not so good on flats.

On the west coast, Enduro bikes are likely much better. That or DH bikes.

And, of course, for most mountain bikers, if not bikers generally, "upgrade" is more likely to mean lighter with similar strength and wear resistance, not improvements in strength per se. Better materials and heat-treating in higher end cassettes might result in better strength and wear resistance, but again, why pay to replace 9-10-11 cogs in a cassette when you only use one?
Yup. My thoughts exactly.

****

Anyway, I wanna get your thougths on something that pertains to me here while we're at it.

I believe I've posted this elsewhere but I'll tell the story here in brief.

When I was a teenager, I flew in the air, jumped over logs, went up steep hills, down steep hills, through mud, and had a blast. I even tried a race.
My old 94" hardrock ultra I got when I was 16 was such a BRILLIANT bike compared to the crappy department store offering I had before.
We had many GREAT places to go everywhere and I LOVED cycling.

Then we moved and it sucked. There was nowhere good to ride so my passion died and I stopped riding.

Fast forward 35 years. I watched a youtube video on how cycling is great for weightlifters because it doesn't burn out the legs like running. So, I started riding again.
I'm enjoying it but I often perceive myself as the experienced rider / teenager, not as the reborn beginner who can't do 1/8th of what I used to do.

Also, the Hardrock Ultra was small. TOO small. When I bought it, I was closer to 6' and it fit well. I finished growing and finished up at a very leggy 6'3".
After my wife's brother in law, my cycling nerd friend, and my physiotherapist (who didn't see me on the bike but only worked on my body the next day) all telling me my bike was too small, I finally decided to get something that fit properly.

The bike with the geometry that fit was a Marlin 7 XXL. The conservative geometry means that it has the seat tube length for my long legs but a comparatively shorter reach for my much more average arm length. My arms are, by no means, short. They're just more 'average'.

But, being a pavement, dirt, AND singletrack kinda rider, the stock gearing was insufficient.
Marlin 8 comes only in XL, not to mention the SRAM SX drivetrain....

The X-Caliber series is a bit of a concern since the geometry is more aggressive....

So. I started talking with the salesguy at the shop. He proposed a VERY competitive upgrade package to create a Marlin 7.8 in lieu of a Marlin 8, since the former bike doesn't come in an XXL.
We worked something out and I put a deposit down and worked out a payment schedule, interest free, with the goal of picking up the bike at the beginning of next season. With this payment / purchase agreement, I don't actually 'own' the bike yet and I can swap the funds to something else should I suddenly change my mind.

Thoughts / observations:

Point 1) The Marlin 7 fits beautifully. My brother is also quite a consummate cycling nerd and he was visiting from the east coast (Canada). He told me the XL frame 'wasn't pretty' but that the XXL frame 'looked right'. The MOST IMPORTANT thing, according to them, is the fit.

Point 2) The Deore drivetrain is sufficient for my needs but the range is too small for the kind of riding I do. So, we put together an upgrade package. A Shimano Deore 5100 RD, CS, and Shifter which gives 11 gears and an 11t - 51t range. Also, a 32t chainring for the FSA crank and a corresponding shimano chain.

Point 3) The salesguy thinks an air fork is VERY important so he suggested a Rockshox Recon Silver RL instead of the stock Judy coil fork. Air fork with Motion Control damper.

Point 4) The bike comes with Kovee TLR wheels so they're going to set it up tubeless with Maxxis Icon 2.35 tires. 120tpi EXO etc etc. NICE tires.

Cost: Before you all freak out, price of the bike with the upgrade package is comparable to any similarly spec'd bike. Orbea ALMA 2020 H50 model, Marlin 8, 2022 Specialized Rockhopper Elite 29, etc. So, the shop has bent over BACKWARDS to make this happen.

My quibbles:

i) I always want the most range I can muster. Seeing a Shimano 135mm QR hub with microspline makes me think of getting the shop to swap the hub and put on a Deore 12speed m6100 cassette, derailleur, shifter, and chain instead. The FSR Alpha Drive chainring will take either an 11 speed or a 12 speed chain anyhow...

The hub would require a different rotor too so we're looking at a c.a. $150 price boost on the project for a c.a. 10% gain in range. It'll raise the theoretical top speed flat sprint on the bike from 40kmph to about 44kmph. (My specialized Hardrock Ultra tops out at 46 kmph by comparison) The Deore m6100 components are actually slightly cheaper than the m5100 components I specc'd for the bike before. But. These upgrades still raise the project cost by approximately 10%, in spite of the savings on the components. The project bike would have better specs but the bike is beginning to become far closer to an X-Caliber 8.

ii) What about an X-Caliber 9? My wife's brother in law said he'd choose an X-Caliber 9 for me as his top pick, provided that there was no budgetary ceiling. This bike has a dropper post, a wider range cassette, and a better front fork. It's lighter and it has a better air spring. Better brakes. Boost spacing. The design seems more forward thinking.

Potential cons:
a) Fit. Trek told me the geometry is more aggressive on the X-Caliber 9 and the Marlin 7 XXL fits me very well. So, we will likely have to adjust the fit on an X-Caliber 9 to compensate. I know they're pretty close but still...

b) The price increase. It's functionally $950 CAD more for a bike that, practically speaking, is only an incremental increase from the Marlin 7 project, which we have nicknamed the Marlin '7.8'.

c) I should be budgeting the left over cash for little piddly things I need: A brake bleed kit. A shock pump for the forks. Water bottle / water bottle holder. Perhaps a PNW dropper post? grin

I am a musician and I dial my musical instruments in to work just so. I seem to be demonstrating that pickiness again but in this case, it's largely pouring over details on a page. So, it's far more academic than practical and based on experience.

My wife also wants me to get a bike that I'll use / ride for years.

I think that for me, I am 65% at 'leave the Marlin 7.8 as is and enjoy the hell out of it when I get it in the spring'. I have confidence that it will be more than enough for me and how I ride. Next purchase should be a fat bike....

I am about 25% at 'It would be really cool to put a Shimano hub on this bike so that I have the option to put on higher end parts when these wear out'. I fully realize that this is an extremely small change and that a gravel bike would be better for SPEED but I really like having that 44T x 12T gear on my Hardrock Ultra. The other day, I blew passed people in that gear with a tailwind. Sadly, now the world is covered in snow....

Lastly, I am about 10% of the mind of 'suck it up and get the X-Caliber9'. Try it out, see how it fits, and if it fits well, just get the higher end bike and enjoy the hell out of it. The funny thing about the X-Caliber 9 is that with the 30t chainring, the slowest gear is only about 6% slower, while the fast gear is only about 4% faster. So, there is not really an appreciable difference. It'll just shift better, ride better, feel better. All just a little bit better... IF it fits right.

I just don't know. I don't have the experience to know and I don't see the bulk of my riding getting really gnarly suddenly. The nearest trail is 35 minutes away by vehicle and it's DEAD easy. Like, beginner easy. A few little hills that my 12 year old can easily climb.
The nearest paved bike path is about a 10 minute drive and there are 'off road' sections over grass, up a sledding hill, down by the creek, etc. The nearest gravel path is about a 15 min drive away and it's mostly flat.
When riding 2 - 3 times per week for fitness, I'm trying to get 20 - 35km in usually on paved paths or gravel paths. The singletrack stuff is a 45min / 1hr drive away and this gets to be a 'few times a year' adventure. For more hilly wonderful singletrack, we're looking at a 2 1/2 hour drive. Maybe we'll do a few trips there.
There is also a small bike park about 20 min from here.

For actual 'mountain' biking, it's a 16 hour drive. So, using anything beyond a modest XC bike requires quite the trip.

I guess, I am curious what you think. If I was a musician, I'd be the 'buy a used Mexican Strat, drop in a modest pickup upgrade, and get a proper set up' kind of a player. AND. That guitar would last me the rest of my life.

I think I think of myself as my teenage self who was more of an enthusiast rider. Teenage me could use a MUCH better bike. But I'm middle aged musician me. I won't push my limits. I can't afford to bail and get hurt. Any upper body injury could be catastrophic and potentially career ending. No thanks.

So what do you think is best for me? Consider my usage habits and my lack of desire for more complex and challenging rides.

Final thoughts:

So far as I am concerned, the Marlin 7.8 is a VERY attractive proposition and the price is extremely competitive. The bike fits beautifully and it will be more than capable enough for 95% of my riding.

Swapping the hub and putting a 12 speed wider range cassette / shifter / derailleur on it would be proverbial icing on the cake. But. It's adding one more faster gear. 10% faster. 4 Kmph.

A PNW dropper post would add the most functionality if I wanted to 'upgrade' further.

The X-Caliber 9 seems like more of a 'dream bike' kind of a thing. But, is it worth $950 CAD more? Furthermore, would I want to change things on it? 32T instead of 30T chainring?
It takes a 120m fork. THAT would be a temptation too...

ALL my guitars are upgraded. I tinker with them and I love to pimp them out. I got a 7 string off of the buy and sell and I spent more on components than I did on the guitar itself. After these upgrades and some significant work from a tech, it performs like a VERY expensive instrument and I LOVE it.

I fear I will develop the same propensity with bikes.

Thanks for hearing me out lol. The journey continues...
 
Are there bikes with a Marlin-eque old school XC geometry that are also single speed bikes? I think this would be, hands down, the best solution.
The problem with singlespeeds is chain tension. You either need horizontal dropouts, or something similar, or a chain tensioner (a lot like the cage on a derailleur). So, there isn't an inexpensive mountain bike with horizontal dropouts, but a geared bike can be made into a singlespeed with a chain tensioner.

I have a cheap variant of the singlespeed faux track bike like you posted that I ride on streets and paved trails and quite enjoy. Because of its simplicity, it doesn't need any high end components to be super-functional and fun to ride. And very good exercise.
 
The problem with singlespeeds is chain tension. You either need horizontal dropouts, or something similar, or a chain tensioner (a lot like the cage on a derailleur). So, there isn't an inexpensive mountain bike with horizontal dropouts, but a geared bike can be made into a singlespeed with a chain tensioner.

I have a cheap variant of the singlespeed faux track bike like you posted that I ride on streets and paved trails and quite enjoy. Because of its simplicity, it doesn't need any high end components to be super-functional and fun to ride. And very good exercise.
Oh don't I have a story about chain tensioners... I had a white BMX with a pedal brake when I was a kid. I got a set of MTB handlebars from the local dump and installed them on the bike.
I was playing around with the drivetrain and I was thinking 'what are these silver bolt things with the brackets'?? I didn't put them back on and I went out tearing as FAST as a hound from hell when the chain slipped and I went sailing over the handlebars. I left quite a bit of skin on the road and was thrown in the back of a pickup truck and taken home.
I got bandaged up and spent the weekend playing Nintendo....
 
21 - 40 of 40 Posts