Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
61 - 80 of 99 Posts
That said, it does greatly extend wear life. We use it on cutting tools and they last 2-3x longer than untreated ones. So while it's not a pretty it is reducing the wear rate.
That is not entirely true. I mean - it is true that it extends the service life of a tool, but that us because it makes it hold an edge a bit longer. But. Tools comparable with bike parts will last hours at most and that is with proper cooling ( pretty much constant flow of coolant and lubrication ). Bike drivetrain parts are designed to be worn off over several hours, hundreads even - with majority of wear being material being frictioned off - whence come the shark fin shape of worn out cogs.

The coating on those parts does the same thing as it does with tools. It extends life by 2 hours. With a tool that may triple service life. With a cassette it extends it from 500 to 502-ish.
 
That is not entirely true. I mean - it is true that it extends the service life of a tool, but that us because it makes it hold an edge a bit longer. But. Tools comparable with bike parts will last hours at most and that is with proper cooling ( pretty much constant flow of coolant and lubrication ). Bike drivetrain parts are designed to be worn off over several hours, hundreads even - with majority of wear being material being frictioned off - whence come the shark fin shape of worn out cogs.

The coating on those parts does the same thing as it does with tools. It extends life by 2 hours. With a tool that may triple service life. With a cassette it extends it from 500 to 502-ish.
It does more than make it hold an edge a little bet longer. It allows the tool to cut 2x3 times more material. Also, The tangential cutting force, point loads and shear do not anywhere's approach what is seen at the tip of the cutting tool which is often in the tens of thousands of kilograms! This is why the coating lasts far longer than the 2 hours you claim. In fact it should double the life of the cassette at a minimum.
 
bottom line

this bling stuff is for the 'dentist builds'

you should be coating chain with lube and riding in the dirt and chunk, shifting a lot as you eat up mad terrain and hills, and come home blasted and half dying. and your chain with less metal atoms on it's rollers and side plates than before rollout.

cure->hang bike on wall and build a less bling bike for actual riding.
It does more than make it hold an edge a little bet longer. It allows the tool to cut 2x3 times more material. Also, The tangential cutting force, point loads and shear do not anywhere's approach what is seen at the tip of the cutting tool which is often in the tens of thousands of kilograms! This is why the coating lasts far longer than the 2 hours you claim. In fact it should double the life of the cassette at a minimum.
guaranteed sram is not coating these nearly as well as an actual machine shop tool would be.
 
if you believe this, I have an oil-slick coated bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, it will last until 2050 without maintenance. Guaranteed!
Gman7 is actually right. A properly made tool and cassette has more life. That being said, if you buy for the bling and put down miles, expect cosmetic blemish. I buy them for the weight savings and durably personally. 2000 miles on the gold bling chain and cassette, still looks newish and well within wear specs. It helps to properly maintain the chain of course. Only got 900 miles out of the NX stuff in the same conditions.
 
It does more than make it hold an edge a little bet longer. It allows the tool to cut 2x3 times more material. Also, The tangential cutting force, point loads and shear do not anywhere's approach what is seen at the tip of the cutting tool which is often in the tens of thousands of kilograms! This is why the coating lasts far longer than the 2 hours you claim. In fact it should double the life of the cassette at a minimum.
It does not prolong anything. Yes - coated tools, tungsten carbide tools, and other more intresting processes allow all that good things. Higher feeds, deeper cuts. But nonetheless once an edge is dull, the tool gets replaced. Whence came replacable milling plates and other things that are meant to allow quick replacements of cutting tools without too much downtime ( some milling centers do it automatically ). Nobody in their right mind expects a cutting tool to last hundreads of hours. Depending on the cutting process a tool might last as little as minutes before being replaced.

A cassette can expect up to 20-25% material loss from teeth when replacement is needed. That is milimeters of material shaved off when all the fancy coatings add microns. The coatings add nothing to longevity of the cassette.

And we totally gloss over the fact that cassettes are made of softer steel then cutting tools. Even the most mundane high speed steel is over 60HRC hardness, while cassettes top at about 40.

To say that coatings extend life of a cassette is like saying that you can make one out of wood if you coat it with tungsten carbide.
 
I think SRAM colored their cassettes to differentiate the tiers of the groupsets. The AXS got the oil slick, XX1 copper/gold...and X01 got black. I have two X01 cassettes...one 11sp and one 12sp. Both started to show wear after a few rides...but nothing like what the OP is showing in that amount of time.

Clean your drivetrain often?

 
This is why the coating lasts far longer than the 2 hours you claim. In fact it should double the life of the cassette at a minimum.
Gman7 is actually right. A properly made tool and cassette has more life.
Can you cite this?
Are you writing a research paper or something?
I cited my anecdotal evidence in the post. You are welcome to cite me if it helps :)
My point is that these coatings on cassettes are purely cosmetic and are not applied for industrial advantages. I have never seen any documented claims or objective evidence produced to validate these rainbow coatings on cassettes are anything more than cosmetic, but am happy to be corrected if someone can produce something from SRAM that says otherwise.
 
Gman7 is actually right. A properly made tool and cassette has more life. That being said, if you buy for the bling and put down miles, expect cosmetic blemish. I buy them for the weight savings and durably personally. 2000 miles on the gold bling chain and cassette, still looks newish and well within wear specs. It helps to properly maintain the chain of course. Only got 900 miles out of the NX stuff in the same conditions.
However, tool steel is not cassette steel, and expecting the same durability benefits is unrealistic, IMO. Now if a cassette were made of tool steel...hmmmn....new lizard (ebike approved) product!
 
My point is that these coatings on cassettes are purely cosmetic and are not applied for industrial advantages. I have never seen any documented claims or objective evidence produced to validate these rainbow coatings on cassettes are anything more than cosmetic, but am happy to be corrected if someone can produce something from SRAM that says otherwise.
yeah, I don't know if such data or claims exist. I did talk to some of my XC racing friends about the longevity of the gold XX1 stuff before replacing my worn NX drivetrain. They said it Was worthwhile. The SRAM website makes claims about the chain and cassette design (not necessarily coating application) increases life and strength, but that is marketing. That was enough for me to open the wallet and make up my own mind. So far so good, I'm seeing results.

got me curious enough to search quickly.... You could dig around ZeroFrictionCycling for testing and evidence if you needed such. I just took a look and it shows the XX1 as the longest lasting and lowest cost per KM among 12spd setups. So, I guess the data to back up the marketing claims are out there, if you trust the validly of the sources. I just like the reduced weight, the cost savings over time will be nice, if realized.
 
It does not prolong anything. Yes - coated tools, tungsten carbide tools, and other more intresting processes allow all that good things. Higher feeds, deeper cuts. But nonetheless once an edge is dull, the tool gets replaced. Whence came replacable milling plates and other things that are meant to allow quick replacements of cutting tools without too much downtime ( some milling centers do it automatically ). Nobody in their right mind expects a cutting tool to last hundreads of hours. Depending on the cutting process a tool might last as little as minutes before being replaced.

A cassette can expect up to 20-25% material loss from teeth when replacement is needed. That is milimeters of material shaved off when all the fancy coatings add microns. The coatings add nothing to longevity of the cassette.

And we totally gloss over the fact that cassettes are made of softer steel then cutting tools. Even the most mundane high speed steel is over 60HRC hardness, while cassettes top at about 40.

To say that coatings extend life of a cassette is like saying that you can make one out of wood if you coat it with tungsten carbide.
You can believe what you want to believe but the science and data on the benefits of titanium nitride are clear for anyone who want to investigate for themselves. It creates a layer 2-5 microns between 2400-2600 Hv hardness - harder than cobalt. It is often used on a variety of medium grade steels as used in fire arms, bike components and knives where the material needs to retain some ductility to prevent brittle fractures. Lastly, cutting tools are not measured in hours. They are measured in the amount of material in cm they can cut. The material properties determine the feed rate speed and ultimately the life of the tool. If the tool lasts minutes as you say it is being misapplied, such as when cutting very hard materials. In such cases chemical erosion or wire EDM are employed. This is how the ring gear, pawls or star ratchet are manufactured where the hardness is often above 1800 Hv.
 
However, tool steel is not cassette steel, and expecting the same durability benefits is unrealistic, IMO. Now if a cassette were made of tool steel...hmmmn....new lizard (ebike approved) product!
Just out of curiosity, what kind of steel is a XX1 cassette made from? I didn't see a claim on the SRAM website, just the Stamped vs CNC method of manufacture.

Really, design and tolerances probably have far more benefits than coating in this debate. Lube and maintenance probably having a significant impact as well. I got convinced to try Dumonde ProX Lite, usually run 300 miles of dusty desert before the chain cries out for a reapplication.

Between the longevity of these parts and the reduced frequency of lubrication, I'm convinced. I'm still running my NX derailleur and shifter along with the pot metal cranks my bike came with, so my bling integrity is likely called into question ;)
 
2 ways to look at it:

A) Humble brag --- I ride so hard I've already burned through the oil slick.

B) Macklemore Thrift Shop song

I'm like, "Yo, that's fifty dollars for a T-shirt."
Limited edition, let's do some simple addition
Fifty dollars for a T-shirt - that's just some ignorant ....
I call that getting swindled and pimped
I call that getting tricked by a business
 
61 - 80 of 99 Posts