Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
21 - 40 of 51 Posts
The one thing that this article glosses over is the actual gearing available with the 1x11 set ups. Check out this blog article on how 1x11 gearing almost has the same range as a triple and a greater range than a double http://blog.artscyclery.com/mountain/is-a-single-chainring-set-up-really-better/
 
I'll raise you one: X9 drive drain that was stock on my bike, converted to 1x10 by just removing front shifter, rings, shortening chain and installing $35 Race Face narrow/wide ring :) No chain drop with regular type1 derailleur.
 
Good article here and the link Tom posted. The only double config the 1 x 11 has greater range than is 32/24 front x 11 x 36 rear. All the other doubles had greater range. Still interesting you can get close, though still can't justify the expense of 1 x 11!
 
Was getting tired of a dropped chain on my old 9 speed triple system, race face with XTR, so looked at this when it first came out. Shocked at the cost of the cassette and being a self confessed tight arse looked for options. The cost of the crank was between XT and XTR and bearable and matched it to an XT cassette and type 2 deraileur and XTR 10 speed shifter. All in all friggen love it, quiet, no chain suck when it is wet, no chain slap, sharp shifts. I run a 34 front 36 rear that gets me up anything I used to be able to do on the old system including big long 25 % climbs, shorter steeper pinches, I was never a spinner anyway. Sharp fast transitions from flat to a short steep can still catch you out since you have to shift through the entire cassette. On the whole if you have the legs, get the front crank (or similar) and go with 1 x 10 and you have as good a system without the huge bucks.
 
The gearing isn't low enough for extended Rocky mtn climbs, especially for a 29er. They need a bigger cassette than a 42 THEN I will think about converting to a 1x setup, until then I'll stick with the wider range on my 2x setup.
 
SRAM devised nothing. The narrow-wide profile on gear teeth has been around for agriculture for longer than mountain biking has existed. That's why RaceFace and WolfTooth can use the same profile without SRAM suing them into the ground Specialized-style.

SRAM 1X11 = 1400
Wolftooth front ring to adapt 2X10 to 1X10 = $68

Hmmm. Smart money's on the attainable upgrade. Leave the $1,400 upgrade to the dentists.
 
Would be nice if this article recognized the fact that on mtbr and elsewhere, people are noticing premature drivetrain wear issues with 1X11. It's not rocket science...chains work best when they are in a reasonably straight line. This is one of the inherent advantages of having a 2X rather than a 1X crankset.
 
>Would be nice if this article recognized the fact that on mtbr and elsewhere, people are noticing premature drivetrain wear issues with 1X11. It's not rocket science…chains work best when they are in a reasonably straight line. This is one of the inherent advantages of having a 2X rather than a 1X crankset.

This may be reversed. We think a 1x drivetrain has a straighter chainline than a 2x or a 3x. The reason is the chainring is dead center and there is no cross-chaining situation ever.

As far as premature wear, XO is still too new. And of all the XX users we know, no one has had to change a cogset yet. The claim from SRAM is it will last just as long as their 2x10 systems do.
 
I run a 1 x 10, shimano XT with the shadow + function. I ride a 36 pnd 7" travel freeride bike, which I try to ride "all-mountain" but with only a 11-36 cassette & 36 front ring I'm lacking in the low gear dept. I'd love to try the 11sp set-up but with an XT rear hub I'd be required to get a new hub & rebuild the wheel to run the XD driver.
 
No one has had to change a cassette yet? Are you guys riding in a clean room or something? I've destroyed an XT cassette and chainring in one muddy weekend of not much over 100 miles, despite swapping in a new chain overnight.

The only real advantages of going single-ring are being able to ditch the front derailleur, and changing the tooth profile to reduce chain drop. The guff about chainline is just marketing spin and you should know it. Running a single chainring gives a straighter chainline than being a wally and riding your triple in the big-big or small-small gear combinations. It's just like riding a triple around in the middle chainring all day, but without having to trim your derailleur for chain rub. If you use a triple like you're meant to, your chainline will be straighter still.
 
Give me a break. I've always been able to use 2 up front without any real issue. 3 up front can give a little rub now and then, but I can live with that on the bike that has a triple in the front.

I've just never encountered any real problems from using front derailleurs. I can see that it might be fun to run a single plus a Rohloff, but only for a limited use bike - ie a commuter.

2 of my bikes have triples and both of them have ridden North Shore and Van Isle.

I ride XT Deore and XTR. 12 years on one derailleur (parts replaced).

I would always prefer to run 2 in the front if for no other reason than chainline. With 9+ gears in the back, you are always going to run into bad chainline with one in the front.

I am not light enough to take those kind of liberties with my chain when I'm 3 hours away from anything.
 
I never understand forums where people bag others for being able to afford new revolutionary kit. As someone else said here, if you cant afford it don't buyit, but dont bag it.

Lambos cost $900k , i cant afford it, but man they are hot.
 
Seems highly expensive way to shift less gears. Tried a 1x11 and a 2x10 on demo bikes before buying my latest Trek, and 2x10 is far superior. And, I've never met a knowledgable mtb'er who has had serious problems with either the design or weight of a Shimano Deore/SLX/XT/XTR front derailleur
 
I love it, but for Now i sticking with 1x9, basically just cant justify the costs when i can use a guide, or a Blackspire Monoveloce chainring and get away with my 12/36 cassete for now. Just wish the would make a rear mech that would work ok with 9 or 10s drive trains hthat works he same way. Then they might be able to convert a lot more of us, that cant afford a $300 or $400 fo a cassette!
 
i'm interested in 1x11, but think that its way too expensive. SRAM seems to marketing to the same people who attend ski resorts. That is to say, they think that all of their customers are uber wealthy and can afford outrageous prices for their products. They are also doing little dickish marketing moves that will bump you up to their higher, more expensive product category like making the xo1 crank only accept a 30 tooth ring when the xo will run a 28 (and the xo is only like $150 more). Another example is their mid priced 10 speed mountain cassette is only available with a 12 tooth cog as the smallest with a 36 tooth large cog. The xg1080 (I think) is available with an 11 tooth in an 11x36 configuration for almost $180 more! I really interested in the 42 tooth replacement cogs, as well as high range, 3rd party cog sets to displace the monopolistic douchery that SRAM is prone to. I used to bemoan Shimano for their monopoly, but have grown to favor their house over time. I will likely be finding a shimano wide range, 11-36 cassette to replace my sram 12-36 when it dies. Perhaps it will be a super wide range 10 speed unit that suggests sram it where the sun don't shine.
 
21 - 40 of 51 Posts