Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
41 - 56 of 56 Posts
On the first link, I got 75 PSI and -10 clicks rebound ... just out of curiosity, I just set it up that way to see how it felt. 75 PSI gave me a 23% sag ... hard to say how it would ride but just looking at it from a sag standpoint, it appears to be going the wrong direction in terms of feeling plush. The second link showed 85 PSI which gave me 21% .... This has me sort of thinking though. If these are the numbers I SHOULD be at to get good sag numbers and yet my sag is considerably lower, I wonder if the bushings are playing a bit of a role here and with them being tight, it is not letting the stanchions slide freely. One more thing to be looking at I suppose.
Yup bushing friction is a huge contributor, and even more so on the trail once you add in the bending forces of hitting a bump straight on. The damper isn't generating much force at all at small bump speeds so your friction and spring settings are the main thing to focus on
 
Discussion starter · #42 ·
Ignore sag percentage. You can have good performance over chatter with 15% sag. I'm more sure than ever your problem is packing.

The spring needs an adequate spring rate.

The adequate spring rate will feel "supportive".
So I took it out today and ran it at 85psi with -10 clicks rebound from slow. Open high and low speed compression and no ramp control. I will admit, it did feel more supported and poppy with no brake dive, but it also didn't feel like it was soaking up the bumps. It felt sort of "bouncier". It was great for popping of jumps and pushing through berms but didn't really soak up the trail like I was hoping it would. At the end, I checked my travel indicator O-ring and it was sitting at 90mm (out of 140) .... I was only getting 65% of my travel. Granted, I didn't have any HUGE drops or massively big hits, but it was relatively lively out there. I would have expected to maybe not bottom out but get at least over 90% travel. I guess I will try again with the 75psi setting and see how that goes, but so far it is looking like I might not have been too far off initially.
 
I used to ride old school Marzochis back in the day and loved how plush they were ... then took like 15 years off of riding and when I came back, air had taken over everything. I'm going to give a few more things a try to see if I can get the air feeling decent without spending more money but then I think the coil is my next step.
I had a Marzocchi Z1 on my GT STS: it was plush! An incredible improvement from the previous suspension Rock Shox that used elastomers :madman: but the Vanilla, especially after I pushed it, was another story. Lovely fork. As I mentioned no air fork came close for 15 years ... bunch of crap really when you think how much they charge ...
 
Discussion starter · #46 ·
Sounds like you need more positive chamber volume.

does that mean "ramp control" turned to zero or does it mean you removed the cartridge? It must take up some space and is not the same as running no volume spacers at all. If it were my fork I'd be getting rid of the ramp control cartridge.
That is actually a good point .... I think it said that the cartridge itself accounts for a single token. and since I am not really using it anyway (by turning it all the way off), there is no point in having it in there
 
Discussion starter · #49 ·
So I took it out today and ran it at 85psi with -10 clicks rebound from slow. Open high and low speed compression and no ramp control. I will admit, it did feel more supported and poppy with no brake dive, but it also didn't feel like it was soaking up the bumps. It felt sort of "bouncier". It was great for popping of jumps and pushing through berms but didn't really soak up the trail like I was hoping it would. At the end, I checked my travel indicator O-ring and it was sitting at 90mm (out of 140) .... I was only getting 65% of my travel. Granted, I didn't have any HUGE drops or massively big hits, but it was relatively lively out there. I would have expected to maybe not bottom out but get at least over 90% travel. I guess I will try again with the 75psi setting and see how that goes, but so far it is looking like I might not have been too far off initially.
I just did another ride with 75psi and no other changes ... this time I ended up with 95mm travel used (out of 140 .... 68%) .... again, this isn't a trail that I would expect to use ALL of my available travel but I would have expected it to be closer than that .... I'm pulling the ramp control unit tonight to see how that affects things.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Discussion starter · #52 ·
I actually rented a shockwiz for the weekend and have a couple rides on it so far .... I started it out at 75psi and it adamantly said to remove air ... took it down to 65psi ... still says to remove air. Tomorrow’s ride ride I’m going down even further probably to 55psi to see what it says. I don’t want to put all my faith in this device but so far it is jiving with what I am feeling and the issues I’m noticing (too rough and not getting full travel) ... we’ll see after tomorrow if things improve.
 
Sounds like your suspension pump gauge is way off. But a lot of smarter people have already adviced you in other aspects. To me it sounded like you have way too much pressure or too small volume, are you sure your ramp control is ok? Remove it and install token instead of it to be sure that it doesnt actually take more space than a token.
 
Discussion starter · #54 ·
Sounds like your suspension pump gauge is way off.
My pump is good ... I was just running WAY to much air. After running the Shockwiz over the weekend, I finally settled at 50psi (as measured both from the Shockwiz and from my Cane Creek digital pump)I think the biggest issue that I was having was that my rebound was set too slow. (Too much rebound damping) Upon taking the advice of others earlier, i removed the ramp control and installed the stock air cap with no tokens and I sped up the rebound significantly and that combined with the lower pressure and it is like a new fork. It feels SO much better now. I got almost all of my travel with a little left over for an emergency. I could probably tune the Charger damper a little because it is still saying to turn down the low and high speed compression (and they are both set completely open) but for now it is light years better than it was before.
Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yeah now you need to remove too much preload from your compression stack to fix those issues (and maybe also mid valve modification to get hsc fixed). Glad to hear it feels good now though. Btw did you release air from the lowers in the sag position with a zip tie? It could be causing you to have to use such low pressure if you have pressure in the lowers.
 
I thought the pressure was too high :D

I personally like no tokens and more pressure. But it is a harsher way to setup your fork, but I enjoy the linear feel and control. I dont think stuffing a fork with tokens is ever good, but try maybe one token and even lower pressure.
 
41 - 56 of 56 Posts