Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1,601 - 1,620 of 1,658 Posts
Thanks Dave-
Just looking for a solid all-rounder. The RS has been great for me, but I got a slightly used DPX2 at a excellent price and I am just more familiar servicing Fox stuff more than RS....which is why I am making the switch. Stupid silly reason really.

Any hardware differences when swapping? like spacers/bushings and stuff?
I just replaced the RS Super Deluxe on my calling for a DPX2 after trying out my friend's. I like it a lot better. I also like spending money on silly things.

You just need the mounting hardware for the shock itself. I think it's about $18-20.
 
Haven't been on a Specialized product for a long time, but compared to my Transition Sentinal (yeah, I know it's not a fair or direct comparison), the Insurgent is not a very good climber....especially with the Flip-Chip in the X-Low setting. As long as your not in a hurry and ok with low and slow, you can climb just about anything, but climbing with the Insurgent is not one of it's strong suits. BTW...I have non-LB version, the new one might be a bit better.
 
Haven't been on a Specialized product for a long time, but compared to my Transition Sentinal (yeah, I know it's not a fair or direct comparison), the Insurgent is not a very good climber....especially with the Flip-Chip in the X-Low setting. As long as your not in a hurry and ok with low and slow, you can climb just about anything, but climbing with the Insurgent is not one of it's strong suits. BTW...I have non-LB version, the new one might be a bit better.
What do you consider a good climber? I demoed a dozen or so bikes before I bought my Insurgent and for me it seems to climb as well as any of the bikes tried in the 140mm to 160mm FS catagory. I have yet to use the x-low setting, saving that for a trip to a down hill lift park.
 
Regarding running a Fox DPX2....

Before I separated my shoulder, I swapped out the stock RS Super Deluxe for a Fox DPX2, and got in about a dozen rides before the injury.

I had no complaints with the RS but the Fox seems to really respond better, both going down and up. Anyone running a DPX2 have the same impression? I just wanted to check with others just to make sure it's not just in my head. Regardless, I give the DPX2 a big thumbs up. And if it's within reason for you to do it, I'd say go for it.
 
After much back and forth, I decided to switch the parts form my 2016 Yeti sb6 to a new Freddy Mercury Insurgent. I went all the way and ordered it with a Push 11-6 so I am pretty excited. The question I have for you guys is about the fork. I have a Fox factory 36 Fit4 that is in great shape but was thinking about going to a 170mm fork but I am jot sure the the climbing will suffer so much that it will turn it into a mini DH bike, which is not my intention. I want to be able to climb up and go down on any trail, so I am not looking for a shuttle queen. I do have a 2018 Calling so the flatter terrain is covered, but thought the 170mm would spread the difference a bit more and make the insurgent more capable and fun going down.

Any opinions?

Thanks.
 
After much back and forth, I decided to switch the parts form my 2016 Yeti sb6 to a new Freddy Mercury Insurgent. I went all the way and ordered it with a Push 11-6 so I am pretty excited. The question I have for you guys is about the fork. I have a Fox factory 36 Fit4 that is in great shape but was thinking about going to a 170mm fork but I am jot sure the the climbing will suffer so much that it will turn it into a mini DH bike, which is not my intention. I want to be able to climb up and go down on any trail, so I am not looking for a shuttle queen. I do have a 2018 Calling so the flatter terrain is covered, but thought the 170mm would spread the difference a bit more and make the insurgent more capable and fun going down.

Any opinions?

Thanks.
The 170 will kill the climbing. I tried it and found it pretty tough going. Not only will the front end get floppy on the climbs but the seat tube angle really suffers. I have my 36 set at 150 and it rails as a rowdy trail bike and I have a 180 dual crown MRP Bartlett for park. Best of both worlds. Setting the 36 fork at 160 is probably the best set it and forget it option. Good choice on the coil rear shock. It really delivers when the trail gets blown out and rough. Such a capable bike.
 
I respectfully disagree with "kill the climbing" (but for fairness, I've not tried 150mm). I moved from a 160 Pike to a Push'd 170 Fox Float GRP2. No difference in climbing - still climbs great for what it is. Does not wallow. Regularly do long climbs with lots of steep very technical sections that require balance and power. I clean those sections just as before. I say outfit the bike to it's full potential. That said, I feel the real benefit I received from the upgrade was due to the Push factor (which is so butter) rather than the extra 10mm. But don't be afraid of 170 for climbing reasons imho. The difference is mice nuts.

Edit: Oh - and I'm coming up on four years with this bike. It's so amazing that I have not one iota of 'upgrade-itis'. So good!
 
1,601 - 1,620 of 1,658 Posts