Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
221 - 240 of 401 Posts
OOPS, my bad...I'm running 12/13mm sag in the rear which is in the 20-23% sag .
However too explain...
I want Enduro Sprint pedal performance, plus riding the terrain we have on the shore is nearly ridiculous to run the manufactures recommended sag unless you enjoy pedal strikes and BB contact. The Suspension Guro's in Vancouver BC have always recommended that I run the rear in the 20-23% range and for me, it works well
Ha! That makes more sense!
Interesting still though to see that difference in sag suggested.
 
View attachment 1088625

Got my Stealth built up, my Yellow Med Frame still for sale. ($3200 CDN, 4 months old)

However, I would like to share that I'm super happy running the Warden with a 170mm fork and the rear in the Neutral position.
I'm smashing my previous best's and have even landed some KOM's that have long been eluding me.

CORRECTION/EDIT....I'm running 20-23% sag (12-13mm) in the rear and 18% up front.
The other super cool thing is that I was able to convert my Fox Fit 4 from 160mm to 170mm just by ordering an Air Spring so I still get the benefits of my Push Tuned fork along with a lock out, trail mode, and of course wide open. If your interested in doing this to your fork you'll have to check your tune code to see if its compatible as early 2016 forks and older are not able to do this.

I may perhaps be sacrificing a little tech climbing ability, but its soooo minute in comparison to the flat out bomber speed I can
confidently carry on the descents that I'd be stupid to be concerned about the possible loss of tech climbing ability. I stress "possible" as I don't feel any hindrance at all on the climbs.

170mm is totally worth a try if you constantly ride steep stair case type terrain like I do (North Shore, Squamish etc)

STOKE ON mon!!
Very interesting...

In getting used to my new WardenC I have been pondering what it would feel like with an extra 10mm of travel up front. Feels good now but still feels like it might be just a tad long and low up front for my liking and a 170mm fork might be the ticket. And I am not riding steep, staircase shore type stuff, just your average mix of all mountain flowy trails.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
does anyone know what the max fork travel (or AC length) is for the Warden C? I didnt see anything on the Knolly website. I assumed it was 160 but if it can take a 170 or 180 that would be good to know. I put a 180 on my current Chilcotin and have zero issues, even for rather tame terrain. Looking at the Delirium as my Chili replacement but if one can fit a 170/180 fork in the Warden that might be a better choice for most of my riding.
 
Any of you guys riding around Denver/Boulder ?

I'm considering a warden carbon for 2017, and I wouldn't mind a short test ride on a Large. We could do a small loop (I have a Megatrail, so if you wanna try that, we can switch !)

Thanks.
 
Cane Creek DB Coil IL with climb switch.....I just received mine, custom tuned from CC.
Haven't ridden it yet but so far I feel that a coil option is the better allround shock for the Carbon warden with the Float X2 not far behind. I feel coil wins even with the weight penalty due to its consistency and small bump compliance advantages. To date I have been riding with a Push 11/6 instead of the Fox Float X2.

Weight was always a concern though....So now with the lighter inline offering from CC I think coil is a no brainer (for me at least)

Shock weights with hardware installed (400lb springs):

Fox Float X2 509 grams
Push ElevenSix 848 grams
CC Inline /Valt Spring 603 grams

The Inline coil is 1/2 pound lighter than the 11/6 and only 94 grams heavier than the X2.
 
Cane Creek DB Coil IL with climb switch.....I just received mine, custom tuned from CC.
Haven't ridden it yet but so far I feel that a coil option is the better allround shock for the Carbon warden with the Float X2 not far behind. I feel coil wins even with the weight penalty due to its consistency and small bump compliance advantages. To date I have been riding with a Push 11/6 instead of the Fox Float X2.

Weight was always a concern though....So now with the lighter inline offering from CC I think coil is a no brainer (for me at least)

Shock weights with hardware installed (400lb springs):

Fox Float X2 509 grams
Push ElevenSix 848 grams
CC Inline /Valt Spring 603 grams

The Inline coil is 1/2 pound lighter than the 11/6 and only 94 grams heavier than the X2.
Good info, what would be good to know is how it compares, weight and performance-wise, to the CCDBA-CS?
 
Cane Creek DB Coil IL with climb switch.....I just received mine, custom tuned from CC.
Haven't ridden it yet but so far I feel that a coil option is the better allround shock for the Carbon warden with the Float X2 not far behind. I feel coil wins even with the weight penalty due to its consistency and small bump compliance advantages. To date I have been riding with a Push 11/6 instead of the Fox Float X2.

Weight was always a concern though....So now with the lighter inline offering from CC I think coil is a no brainer (for me at least)

Shock weights with hardware installed (400lb springs):

Fox Float X2 509 grams
Push ElevenSix 848 grams
CC Inline /Valt Spring 603 grams

The Inline coil is 1/2 pound lighter than the 11/6 and only 94 grams heavier than the X2.
You mention it is custom tuned. Beyond selecting the spring is CC doing any customization like you would get in a Push or Avy shock?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
Holback......you have a CC DB Air, take it off and weight or google the weight for a comparison.
Regarding performance, (not intended to offend) I feel that 2-3 years ago the CC DB Air was the leading air shock. However, fast forward to current times and I feel the CC DB Air is lagging in comparison to current offerings from other brands. Its short comings are that its heavier, difficult to set up so that it to stays high in its travel while still being able to be plush enough. I also can't stand the notchy feeling you get at the top of its stroke . This however , just my personal opinion and preference.
 
you have a CC DB Air, take it off and weight or google the weight for a comparison.
Regarding performance, (not intended to offend) I feel that 2-3 years ago the CC DB Air was the leading air shock. However, fast forward to current times and I feel the CC DB Air is lagging in comparison to current offerings from other brands. Its short comings are that its heavier, difficult to set up so that it to stays high in its travel while still being able to be plush enough. I also can't stand the notchy feeling you get at the top of its stroke . This however , just my personal opinion and preference.
Yeah I can get the weight, I guess I was looking for comparison of how the IL Coil feels and performs compared to the CCDBA. Let us know once you get some rides on it. I have a CCDBA-CS on my Endo26 and love it but haven't quite been able to get it feeling the same on the WardenC yet. I kind of feel the same way you do about it on the Warden - rides a little low in travel but when you get it riding higher it isn't as plush as I'd like. Maybe it's because I've been swapping it with the 11-6, but I think it's more than that. Could also be I haven't dialed it in properly yet and/or it needs more break in, but what's weird is it feels like it accomplishes all things well on the Endo. Maybe the extra 15mm travel changes the dynamic....
 
Will someone give me a sales pitch on why I should buy the carbon warden over the aluminum version? I only care about the difference in ride characteristics.

I have been stubbornly against carbon the last few years but now have an opportunity for the carbon warden and am seriously considering it.

For reference, I have been on the last 2 versions of the 26" endorphin. I am 5'7, 150 lbs, live in Asheville NC region and race enduros on the regular.
 
Because it's better - LOL

Honestly, I've never ridden a Carbon Warden.

But, I do like the fact that if I crash my aluminum Warden, I can just sand down the damage on my raw frame. Or not.

Were as if I crashed the carbon version, I'd probably be pissed from the damage.
 
Because it's better - LOL

Honestly, I've never ridden a Carbon Warden.

But, I do like the fact that if I crash my aluminum Warden, I can just sand down the damage on my raw frame. Or not.

Were as if I crashed the carbon version, I'd probably be pissed from the damage.
I guess the rebuttal to that is that you can repair carbon but not aluminum. I could care less about superficial "damage" as all of my bikes are thrashed after a few years. I have broken an aluminum knolly also.
 
I guess the rebuttal to that is that you can repair carbon but not aluminum. I could care less about superficial "damage" as all of my bikes are thrashed after a few years. I have broken an aluminum knolly also.
Who mentioned broken or repair???

I'm always impressed by the reading and comprehension skills on this forum.

Also, I never had a bike for a few years, I usually sell them within 6-9 months and move on. It's just easier selling a frame with no blemishes for me.

Sounds like it doesn't matter for you and Carbon would probably be "better".
 
Who mentioned broken or repair???

I'm always impressed by the reading and comprehension skills on this forum.
.
Um, I mentioned it? Speaking of reading comprehension....It wasnt a response to you saying you broke one, it was additional information I was supplying.

Since you have not ridden a carbon warden, I think you should stop giving "advice." Also, try not be such a dick for the wrong reason, it makes you look bad.
 
Um, I mentioned it? Speaking of reading comprehension....It wasnt a response to you saying you broke one, it was additional information I was supplying.

Since you have not ridden a carbon warden, I think you should stop giving "advice." Also, try not be such a dick for the wrong reason.
Haha - nice one. How old are you 12?

I'm sure most of us could care less about how you thrash. Maybe you should learn to ride a bike (or go on a diet) if you are breaking aluminum bikes.
 
Dude give it up. I am 30 years old and I have raced Knolly (as part of the knolly race team) bikes for 3 years. I am not bragging, I am looking for constructive feedback from people familiar with the carbon version before I spend thousands of dollars. There are very knowledgeable people on this forum, I am speaking to them.

I can ride a bike quite well and as my first post described, I weigh 150 lbs so my weight is not an issue thank you very much. Seriously, you are making yourself look bad here, look at my reputation score and then look at yours. Please stop detracting from my attempt to gain useful knowledge from this forum.
 
Discussion starter · #239 ·
I didn't ride an aluminum Warden, but owned an Endorphin and Delirium. The Warden has a differently feel. It is hard to pin point, it is subtle, but is noticeable. It is kind of like aluminum versus carbon rims, they have a different ride behavior. The carbon Knolly executed is pretty cool relative to other carbon frames - it is not overly stiff, not is it a noodle, it is just right. I was riding the aluminum Endorphin and used most of the same parts for the carbon Warden and instantly I recognized the difference. Since I have been on the carbon Warden for the 6 months, this is my daily driver so now I am just use to its ride behavior and its harder to recognize that distinction anymore, now it is the norm. One thing my friends always say when they hop on my bike, it is so quiet - no rattling.
 
For what it's worth, I don't have time on an aluminum Warden but was on the Endo26 (with CCDBA-CS, Stans wheels, Pike 150) for the last 2 seasons. I've been riding a WardenC with CCDBA-CS/11-6, I9 Enduro wheels, Lyrik. Both bikes are Large. Here are the differences to me, none of which should be earth-shattering:

WardenC
- much stiffer, tracks much better
- much longer
- can handle more chunder/bigger hits much smoother while tracking straighter
- longer reach, less cramped cockpit, more comfortable climbing/pedaling position

Endo26
- snappier and more playful
- more nimble
- significantly lighter with my builds
- noticeably more amount of play in rear end, overall frame/bike has much 'softer' feel

The Warden doesn't feel harsh in any way, just different. Some of these things can probably be attributed to the way the bikes are set up and the increase in travel, for example: the I9 wheels feel an order of magnitude stiffer than my old Stans wheels and may be contributing to the stiffness factor (they are also bigger and heavier). I will probably put a slightly shorter stem on the Warden which should make it feel a little more playful like the Endo.

EDIT: only other totally esoteric, subjective comment I'll make is that on the Endo I felt like there were a few times (not many) when I could overpower/push the bike beyond it limits, with the WardenC I'm having trouble keeping up with the bike
 
221 - 240 of 401 Posts