Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 46 Posts

intheways

· Cheesiest
Joined
·
1,611 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 · (Edited)
Alright, I take back everything I said about Stan's. Their stuff is solid.

I do think Continental should clearly state that specs on the tire refer to tubed tires.

Gawddamit
 
Discussion starter · #4 ·
I was pretty surprised that it blew off the rim too. I guess the pressure discharge blew it off. The bead is all messed up and the rim (with 1 ride) dented in a spot where the wheel landed after the valve broke.

I tried another valve (Stans) and the tire (conti xking) doesn't seat properly.

I usually don't like to post *****y things, but this cost me a race, tire and damaged the rim.
 
Discussion starter · #6 ·
While inflating. It didn't really cost me a race, but I had a race scheduled the next day and my last tube had a hole. That's my bad
 
Conversely, I like Stans Valves. I don't care for their rims, or hubs, but their valves are shaped to work with most every rim manufacturer, and removeable cores are great.
 
cerebroside;Note: Do not exceed 40 psi when seating a mountain bike tire tubeless on Stan's rims.[/QUOTE said:
^This^
I couldn't understand at first how you can blame a Stan's valve.
My tires normally seat at around 25 pounds that's using Specialized and Maxxis tires.
 
Notubes valves suck!!!

And the plot finally unravels...

If you went to 60-psi, the tire was already sealing for a good while. If the bead was not aligned properly along the rim, it was probably because of lack of lubrication (sealant or soap) and not lack of pressure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
1 - 20 of 46 Posts