Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
21 - 40 of 100 Posts
My thoughts. If I were me I would get the new RST First Air 24" fork for about $250 shipped, and this fork is going to be way better than anything produced in 1996. No mods necessary and 1600 grams. V brake and disc mounts.

By the time you factor your time it takes you to do the conversion, not to mention if you drilled/cut it right you might be better off buying a proven fork already on the market with 2014 air cartridge technology. What is an extra 250-300 grams on a fork? Focus your weight loss in the wheels where it really matters.
Hey GSJ1973,

Thank you for your thoughts and recommendation on the RST First Air 24" fork. I'll have to spend a bit more time researching that option and the features it would offer. For those that might come across this later, here is my thought process on considering the older SID.

- Weight: The current owner of the 96 RS SID provided me a weight of 1174 grams. There would be a bit of additional weight in the v-brake adapter. I should still come in below the 1600 gram limit but it's going to be much lighter than the existing fork on the bike(s).

- Performance: One of the minuses with this old of a SID is that it lacks dampening or rebound control. Big plus for the RST First Air fork especially if my kids are on this bike for 2-3 years. My question on dampening is whether or not this feature for a 8-10 year old is worth an additional $150? I image I should still be able to manually change the air pressure around in order to find a good fit for the weight they are at.

- Cost: $100 vs. $250 vs. other. I'm sure there is a degree of getting what you pay for in this equation, which is what we as adults evaluate on our own builds. For $100 I feel like I'm getting a healthy weight and performance gain from the existing heavy, coil sprung shocks on the bikes today. I'm not sure today's technology is going to give me incrementally more benefits in my application relative to the cost. Another cost consideration is maintenance/repair on the SID. I've been told it's in great condition but if it does need serviced, might be a challenge to find the right seal kit.

Maybe one of the newer 24" forks is a good option for me to consider on one of the bikes that will be around longer term. I've got at least one more kid to pass down a 24" to and another on the way. Will make that evaluation once I pull everything apart and get a better feel for the individual frames weight/geometry.

Thanks again for everyone's thoughts!
 
I've given this F1rst v SID thing a bit of thought here. If you're in any way handy, then get a used SID, give it a rebuild (full service kits are still readily available and cheap) and with the money you save over the F1rst, build a good 24" disc front wheel. This will be a far superior setup to a v-braked F1rst. Also, when your kid grows out of 24", you can use the SID with a new set of 26" wheels. This is exactly what I have done over the past 12 months. If you can, try for a newer SID (2005-2007). It will be in every way superior to the RST fork.

Image
 
Discussion starter · #23 ·
What are your thoughts on a 1996 Rockshox SID 80mm v-brake fork with a 420mm axle to crown as a replacement for a 24" fork. I can get one locally in pretty good condition for $100. I haven't yet measured either of the two 24" forks I have and I realize I'd need to find/make an adapter to drop the brakes down to the 24" rim.
Looks like SID forks were not introduced until 1999, so the 1996 date might be wrong? Sid had disk mounts so probably easier to just use with a disk wheel than to fabricate a disk mount. If it really is from 1996 and is V-brake only, it does not sound like a SID. RS top fork from 1996 was a Judy, perhaps that is what you are looking at?
 
Discussion starter · #24 ·
My thoughts. If I were me I would get the new RST First Air 24" fork for about $250 shipped, and this fork is going to be way better than anything produced in 1996. No mods necessary and 1600 grams. V brake and disc mounts.

By the time you factor your time it takes you to do the conversion, not to mention if you drilled/cut it right you might be better off buying a proven fork already on the market with 2014 air cartridge technology. What is an extra 250-300 grams on a fork? Focus your weight loss in the wheels where it really matters.
Incase you missed it, there are already dozens and dozens of other threads going that discuss the options for purchasing expensive, overweight and underperforming new forks for kids bikes. This thread is for discussing alternative DIY approaches to better performing forks. Playing with modifying bike parts is very much a hobby. If you try to rationalize the time you spend on a hobby as a loss in a cost comparison, you are entirely missing the point of having hobbies. If I were concerned about the loss of time involved, I certainly would not have volenteered to convert several bikes for other kids in the neighborhood and I would not have bothered with the time to document the process here so that others can take inspiration and contribute.
 
Looks like SID forks were not introduced until 1999, so the 1996 date might be wrong? Sid had disk mounts so probably easier to just use with a disk wheel than to fabricate a disk mount. If it really is from 1996 and is V-brake only, it does not sound like a SID. RS top fork from 1996 was a Judy, perhaps that is what you are looking at?
As I was looking for additional info I came to the same conclusion about the model year. It does not have dampening so I'm sure that will help differentiate a little between the years. I went ahead and picked it up this morning. Weighed in at 1,117 grams with the titanium brake bosses.

Looking forward to going through it and learning more about the internals. The search continues for a 2nd option. I will continue to consider the 26" fork shortening.

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I just wanted to counter that if you actually pay someone to do the work you did: build a wheel, rebuild a fork... it's way more expensive than getting a 24" wheel.
I bought a spinner air fork. Not as good as a SID but worked right out of the box much better than what came on my son's bike. Having a new wheel built, buying a disc hub and spokes, then having a fork rebuilt is $$. I paid $150 for the spinner fork. I could not find a decent SID for that.
It's like saying 'Why buy a new car for $25k when you can get an old broken down one for free and fix it up?' It takes time and expertise.
Now if someone gave me a SID, I might tackle it... but I just wanted to get it going.
Finally, if the bike is going to be handed down to a younger sibling, I wanted to set it up so no parts would move up to the next bike.
The first 26" bike will have a SID, though. Great fork for light people (kids).
You should sell a kit with a rebuilt SID, a front disc brake and a 24" disc wheel. How much would you sell it for, over what you paid for the parts????
 
Incase you missed it, there are already dozens and dozens of other threads going that discuss the options for purchasing expensive, overweight and underperforming new forks for kids bikes. This thread is for discussing alternative DIY approaches to better performing forks.
"Better performing forks" is where I challenge you. I've owned both and can comment based on experience. Have you owned a RST First 24 air? I had a 2004'ish era SID 26" back in the day and I would rather ride a 24" 2014 RST product any day of the week (with only 60mm travel) over those SID's of old.

I'd gladly accept the 300 gram weight penalty over drills, saws, and chopping down fork legs, and spending $100+ on 8-10+ year old technology but that's just me.

Just some alternative perspective that there are now really good products on the market - RST First Air and Spinner Air 24".
 
You'll need to show us what's inside a RST F1rst before I'll believe that it offers better suspension performance than a properly setup 10 year old SID. What's the damper? Any shims inside or simply port-orifice? What's the parts availability like? Repair manual online? etc. I have no idea about any of these things because its next to impossible to find any information online about these RST forks. For me that's an immediate turn off. My kids are riding their bikes alot and I can't have a bike out of action for a fortnight because I'm waiting on a set of seals or some other minor part.

Suspension forks require regular maintenance. There's nothing wrong with a second hand fork provided it is not mechanically damaged. Replacing oil and seals is the sort of thing manufacturers recommend at fairly regular intervals (some as short as every 50 hours). So what's the big deal with doing that when you get a second hand fork? You'll have to do it in a several months anyway even with a new fork.
 
You'll need to show us what's inside a RST F1rst before I'll believe that it offers better suspension performance than a properly setup 10 year old SID. What's the damper? Any shims inside or simply port-orifice? What's the parts availability like? Repair manual online? etc. I have no idea about any of these things because its next to impossible to find any information online about these RST forks. For me that's an immediate turn off. My kids are riding their bikes alot and I can't have a bike out of action for a fortnight because I'm waiting on a set of seals or some other minor part.

Suspension forks require regular maintenance. There's nothing wrong with a second hand fork provided it is not mechanically damaged. Replacing oil and seals is the sort of thing manufacturers recommend at fairly regular intervals (some as short as every 50 hours). So what's the big deal with doing that when you get a second hand fork? You'll have to do it in a several months anyway even with a new fork.
Good questions. I've not gotten to the point of taking it apart in 15 months he has had it on his bike nor has it required servicing the way the Rock Shox of old do. I still have canisters of Judy Butter and Slick Honey on my work bench from the old Rock Shox days.

Down side is 60mm of travel, the SID's are 80/100.

If/when the RST needs service, I will take it apart and post pics what I find.
 
I'm coming up on probably having to do a 24" bike later part of next season as my son is getting close to out growing his 20".

All this nodding forks for a 24"... Do u realize the little difference from 24 and 26"??? I understand v brakes being of concern in some cases. And for some doing the custom work is fun, hell I love working on our bikes.

But im doing my research as moving him to 24" also means getting one with disc brakes.

Normal 24" forks blow that come on most bikes. Will be researching and setting to buy a set of forks that I can shorten the travel easily so that a-c is close. Being our local trails a bit slacker head angle will be hugely helpful as lots of hills and fast flow on the decents. But there is a line there that will affect him on the rest if I let it be too slack. Won't be too hard being 60-80mm is plenty on a 24" (I ride 100mm and rare I can use it all and takes a really wrong landing off a drop to bottom out).

Look at it this way take a 29er with xc geo so ht is steeper. Now take a 26"/27.5 with trail/am geo. Smaller wheels, smaller wheel base, even with slacker geo is going to be faster in the tight areas. Plus more stable at speed especially when descending. But I look at my sons bike differently than I look at mine. Making him more stable with better performance allows more confidence. This has worked very well thus far and since rebuilding his 20" (wish I could have gotten forks too but couldn't justify for 1.5 more seasons) making it insanely lighter, faster, and better quality parts throughout. This has made him progress by leaps and bounds in a short time.

Also a new model fork you know parts will be available for years to come. And hell seal kits aren't expensive in most cases, so buy a couple to have in hand.

Now this is opinion and my veiws only, wanted to add another view to this as food for thought. More food: so many parents have nice 1500-2500 bikes yet buy their kids WalMart bikes or brand name bikes that honeslty aren't all that much better performing than a WalMart bike??? Spend less on yourself for biking and more on ur kids. Or do like I did, work fair amount of overtime just for the purpose of redoing his mt60 into a bike even im proud of (and him for helping with alot of wrench time)
Sent from my Nokia Stupid Phone using Tapatalk
 
All very interesting and valid pros and cons with the last several posts. I personally went with a 2000 SID and now I'm waiting for the seals and travel adjust spacers to come in. It'll be about $150 total with just fork and parts. This doesn't include the Alex-20/Novatec/Sapim parts that I'll be building up as well as the disc brakeset. So as you can see, it'll definitely cost much more than if I got the RST F1RST and kept the stock wheelset and v-brakes. He's also not going to be able to ride it right away. However, if I didn't already have all the tools and desire to wrench and learn, as well provide a learning opportunity for my son, then I certainly would've gone with an aftermarket 24" air fork. For us, we find it equally fun to work on bikes as it is to ride them, which I understand is not necessarily the case for everyone.
 
So I'm back to working in those manitou forks. I found a manitou sport fork with a nice long thread less steerer and aluminum legs. So I'm working on that one. The elastomers are a sticky greasy gooey mess. I've spent the last two days taking it apart and cleaning it. Had to get creative to figure out how to loosen the Allen bolts down inside the fork tubes. Eventhough the bolts are loosened the legs are still seized inside the lowers because I guess the elastomers have melted and dried like a glue. I have both of the forks partially disassembled and soaking in degreaser right now. Hopefully that helps a little.
 
The Forks are a Manitou 2 and a Manitou Sport. The Sport I believe came out the same year as the Manitou 2 or 3. It has the design of the two but uses the aluminum legs of the three. The Manitou Sport doesn't have the rebound adjustment and so was cheaper. Both of these forks have the elastomers in the bottom of the fork legs. The elastomers are a real mess and are going to take some work to clean out. Why anyone would want one of these forks for anything other than cutting it up is beyond me! When I raced on a manitou three in the 90's the only way to get it to work was to put speed springs in them.
 
Grayjay, I'm currently building two 24" wheel bikes for my twin boys. I'm using Gary Fisher Precaliber frame for one (not sure of the year) and a Specialized Hotrock 24 (2005). The front fork for the Precaliber came in at 2.1 kg approximately, so I've picked up one Indy SL fork to modify and looking for a second. Thanks very much for your thread on this topic, it wouldn't have occurred to me to shorten a 26" fork. If you don't mind, I may have a few questions for you as I go along.
 
So, my first Indy SL fork arrived, and it is not what I expected. It measured 1,523 gr. on the scale vs. the "advertised" 1,220 gr. As I'm purchasing this for it's light weight as well as ability to be shortened, I'm quite disappointed. In addition, it is a threaded version. It appears as though a prior owner has put the exterior legs (forgive my lack of knowledge) onto the uppers and maybe internals of a Judy XC or something similar.

I have another one on the way that I have good information on, it should be fine, but I will still need to find a second one for my other son.

 
Discussion starter · #38 ·
wpg- bummer this one weighs so much. graphics of the fork look correct for a '97 indy SL. They omitted the cantilever brake cable hanger (v-only) in 1998. Info on these at;
Rock Shox Museum &
service manual at suspensionforkparts - Rock Shox Manuals

The 1220gr claimed weight is specific to the threadless steer version which used an aluminum steerer, if yours is threaded it is steel and likely makes it a bit heavier but shouldnt account for being 300gr overweight. If the steer tube is long enough and frame size is small enough, you still might be able to use it with a threadless stem, just ensure that the bottom of the stem is well below the height of the old threads so that you are not transmitting torque from the handlebars/stem directly though the stress riser of the threads that could cause the steer to sheer off at the threads.
Weird that it would weigh even more than the lower end indy C that had steel steer and steel stanchion tubes. I dont think any of the parts (except possibly the elastomers) from a judy fork would interchange to an indy. The Judy had larger diameter stanchions (28mm vs 25.4mm) wider spacing between the legs, a wider crown and completely different cast lowers (dropouts on protruding tabs instead of inline with the stanchions).

You should go ahead and disassemble the fork, see if there is anything weird with the internals that makes it so heavy such as if previous owner replaced the elastomers with heavier steel downhill springs. I think that the cast lowers should all be very close to the same, you can practice the dropout shortening modification with this fork first, if it goes well then you can then interchange and use the lowers on another lighter fork should you get one, I dont think the lowers will weigh different.
 
Thanks for your advice Grayjay. I'd looked at the Rock Shox Museum info, that's where I'd seen the 1,220 weight. That's also where I'd seen a crown from a Judy that looks a lot like the one on this fork. In any case, my hunt continues for a replacement.

Here is a photo of the second Indy SL. I have not picked it up yet, so do not have an accurate weight on it.



In order to keep the geometry the same as the existing setup, I understand I need to keep the A to C measurement the same. I'm assuming I measure from the middle of the axle, but where on the crown should I measure to?
 
Discussion starter · #40 ·
Looks as if the second indy S is threadless, hopefully will weigh less. With the Indy forks that have crowns with removeable stanchions (retained by pinch bolts), you can interchange the crown with one from a mag21 should you need to change to a different steer tube size, such as going from 1" threaded to 1-1/8" threadless. (mag 21 used same 1" stanchion size and width spacing).
Measure the A-C from center of hub up to bottom of the headeset crown race. A 20mm A-C difference will change the frame seattube and headtube angles by 1° (steeper for a shorter A-C.
 
21 - 40 of 100 Posts