Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 29 Posts

deesta

· Registered
Joined
·
980 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
The top link on my Intense 6.6 needs replacing due to a badly fitted bearing (by the previous owner) which has pushed some of the bearing seat out meaning the bearing will not seat flat anymore.
Intense do not make them any more and cannot find any available anywhere so I'm looking to make my own.
I'm a CNC machinist so have all the skills necessary but was wondering a couple of things:
  • What is the best grade of aluminium to use?
  • How could the design be improved?

I believe Intense used 6061 for their linkages. 6082 is a newer, better grade but would something like 7075 be even better?
Here's a pic showing the existing linkage:


I can feel some flex in this so would like to stiffen it up if possible. Thoughts?
Cheers
Steve
 
I don't think you see the *linkage itself* flexing, though. You might be seeing flex where it attaches to various pivot points on the frame, but that's a big hunk of aluminum. I would be pretty shocked if there was any significant flex that you could fix by adding material.

But hey, go for it. A few extra grams of aluminum isn't going to hurt anything.

-Walt
 
How bad is the bearing fit issue? If it's just a loose slip fit now, you can fix that stuff with the right kind of adhesive and some know how...

Shoot me a PM if you want some ideas.
 
Discussion starter · #7 ·
I don't think you see the *linkage itself* flexing, though. You might be seeing flex where it attaches to various pivot points on the frame, but that's a big hunk of aluminum. I would be pretty shocked if there was any significant flex that you could fix by adding material.

-Walt
You might be right and it might be an optical illusion, will have another look later

What Walt said. Stiffness is equal across alloys. The only way to increase stiffness is adding material. 6061-T6 and copy the design.
That's the main idea, to increase the blend rad's between the side plates and the centre web.

How bad is the bearing fit issue? If it's just a loose slip fit now, you can fix that stuff with the right kind of adhesive and some know how...

Shoot me a PM if you want some ideas.
The bearing is still a good fit but the seating face isn't square to the opposite side as it's been swagged out due to the bearing not being fitted properly and tightened off square.
 
I believe Intense used 6061 for their linkages. 6082 is a newer, better grade but would something like 7075 be even better?
I'm surprised its not made from some sort of 2xxx series aluminium. Typically, for a full CNC machined part something out of 2011 or 2024 will machine better and not have a significant disadvantage in strength. The connecting tube isn't welded is it? Then 6061 would make sense.
 
I would try machining the bore out and making a sleeve to press into the rocker link with the correct ID for the bearing. Something around .020 wall thickness to leave as much material on the original part as possible while being thick enough to survive bearing installation. A stepped sleeve that is thicker at the top would work even better. You can pick up the location of the undamaged side of the link when you machine the bad side out to regain bearing alignment. That would be far less work than reverse engineering the entire rocker link
 
Discussion starter · #12 ·
Can't see any cracks. Looks like it's just a little flexy which may go towards the general flex the 6.6 is infamous for.
Can't rebore the seating face asAthens mmisaligned bearing has pushed some of the seating face through so it won't sit flat at all..
 
1 - 20 of 29 Posts