Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

TPC vs SSV-F?

2K views 25 replies 9 participants last post by  Prexus2005  
#1 ·
Which is the better damper?

I have read that the Marzocchi SSV-F performs poorly on big hits due to the damper not being able to cope with rapid spikes.
Is this true with Manitou's TPC?

Thanks,
Bob
 
#2 ·
SSV-F is actually very good for big hits. DJing, Urban. What it isn't good for is high speed trail chatter. It just can't react fast enough to absorb the bumps.

TPC is great for trail, but it lacks any type of bottom out control for big hits. That's why Manitou is championing the SPV stuff, as it provides bottom out control (in addition to platform).

_MK
 
#3 ·
Ah, that makes sense.

I am pretty pleased with TPC so far, so I will stick with it. I rarely take big hits, and don't have issues with bottoming out. I do get into some higher-speed chatter, and have chronic neck pain, so having a fork that will minimize those spikes is VERY important.

Thanks for the info!

Bob
 
#4 ·
MK_ said:
SSV-F is actually very good for big hits. DJing, Urban. What it isn't good for is high speed trail chatter. It just can't react fast enough to absorb the bumps.

TPC is great for trail, but it lacks any type of bottom out control for big hits. That's why Manitou is championing the SPV stuff, as it provides bottom out control (in addition to platform).

_MK
Plain old TPC works great with their air/coil system. Plush on the little stuff thanks to the coil and the air handles the big stuff like air always does. The only problem is brake dive. :(

TPC+ did a great job of that. If only I could get one into my 2004 Black Super air. :rolleyes:
 
#5 ·
pedalinbob said:
I do get into some higher-speed chatter, and have chronic neck pain, so having a fork that will minimize those spikes is VERY important.
The best damping for high-speed trail chatter is found in Marzocchi's HSCV and Fox's dampers, especially when given PUSH treatment (Fox).

_MK
 
#6 ·
anand said:
Plain old TPC works great with their air/coil system. Plush on the little stuff thanks to the coil and the air handles the big stuff like air always does. The only problem is brake dive. :(

TPC+ did a great job of that. If only I could get one into my 2004 Black Super air. :rolleyes:
I just got a Marathon XC, and the new TST dampening works really well. I have another bike with SSV valving, and the Marathon in the DS mode is much plusher. The settings on the TST knob are very distinct from one another. In AM mode the dampening is much slower, and works like SPV in that it does not bob as much but is not as plush. In the DS mode this fork is one of the plushest I have ever used!! Much plusher than a Minute 1. Plus you can set the travel to adjust geometry. You can adjust preload. And the ETA adjust is great to quickly lower the fork almost 2 inches instantly to power up a steep uphill. All adjustments are easy to access, and the knobs are metal, not cheesy plastic like on some forks. Plus all the adjustments actually make changes that can be readily felt when riding. I like having a fork that I can have an effect similar to SPV, but that I can then instantly set to a super plush mode without the loss of sensitivity that any type of anti-bob device incurrs. I took off the Fox that came on my Trance 1 and tried a Minute 1, and now the Marathon XC and this fork is going to stay!!! Neither of the other forks were as plush, and neither was as versatile, and easy to switch to different modes.
 
#8 ·
anden said:
What are you basing that conclusion on?
I am basing it on riding the various forks!! I have been mountain biking since 1985 before there were suspension forks. I have worked at a Specialized dealer for 12 years now and have owned numerous Manitou, Rockshox, and Marzocchi forks, starting with the first Manitou fork ever on the market. Lately many forks seem like they have been losing the ability to absorb small bumps in an attempt to either gain bottoming resistance for hucking big jumps, or to get rid of unwanted pedal bob. I have been swithching around between many different forks in the last few years trying to find a fork that soaks up small rocks and roots, and still works at speed on downhills. I ride technical trails but do not do big drops and jumps.I really like the feel or the new TST dampening settings like in the Marathon XC. I switched from the Minute 1 and then rode the same trail as before just 3 days later on the Marathon XC, and the difference in dampening on the Marathon was dramatically better than the Minute, or the Fox fork that was on my Trance 1 before that. In the DS setting it is very responsive. The Minute bounced around off rocks much more, even at low SPV settings, and if you go too low on the SPV setting to gain plushness, then it makes an ugly knocking sound. At least on the Marathon XC you can switch from a mode like the AM mode that resists movement at the expense of compliance, to a fully open compliant mode at the turn of a dial. I suggest riding the 2 forks back to back and see for yourself. I also have a KHS softtail with an MX Pro, and there is a definate improvement in the Marathon fork over that fork as well.
 
#10 · (Edited)
anden said:
What are you basing that conclusion on?
Here's how Marzocchi advertizes SSVF:

Our SSV system uses five damping circuits per leg to instantly deliver incredible damping comfort and control.These valves operate in the compression and rebound phase allowing varying amounts of oil to flow through the system according to force and speed of impact.

SSVF is our "Speed Sensitive Valve Floating" with a specially designed Floating Valve that further enhances the SSV concept. The floating valve instantly lets oil flow through the first valve circuit with no resistance providing greater initial and small bump sensitivity. As oil flow increases in velocity and volume, the floating valve closes, providing more oil flow resistance and hence more damping performance.


You add open bath concept to the mix, which allows you to fine tune bottom out resistance by controling air volume with oil levels (air ramps up providing very a progressive spring) and you have a fork that can take big hits really well.

_MK
 
#11 ·
anden said:
I was actually (not too clearly) refering to your "What it isn't good for is high speed trail chatter. It just can't react fast enough to absorb the bumps.".
SSV dampers don't have any shims or anything fancy of the sort. There are just holes through which the oil flows. At higher speeds there isn't enough oil moving around for the fork to soak up the bumps.

_MK
 
#12 ·
MK_ said:
Here's how Marzocchi advertizes SSVF:

Our SSV system uses five damping circuits per leg to instantly deliver incredible damping comfort and control.These valves operate in the compression and rebound phase allowing varying amounts of oil to flow through the system according to force and speed of impact.

SSVF is our "Speed Sensitive Valve Floating" with a specially designed Floating Valve that further enhances the SSV concept. The floating valve instantly lets oil flow through the first valve circuit with no resistance providing greater initial and small bump sensitivity. As oil flow increases in velocity and volume, the floating valve closes, providing more oil flow resistance and hence more damping performance.


You add open bath concept to the mix, which allows you to fine tune bottom out resistance by controling air volume with oil levels (air ramps up providing very a progressive spring) and you have a fork that can take big hits really well.

_MK
I was actually (not too clearly) refering to your "What it isn't good for is high speed trail chatter. It just can't react fast enough to absorb the bumps.".
 
#13 ·
Prexus2005 said:
"The floating valve instantly lets oil flow through the first valve circuit with no resistance providing greater initial and small bump sensitivity."

Doesn't that mean it is in fact designed to absrobe high speed trail chatter??? :confused:

Phil.
Well, not exactly. A small bump is not the same thing as hundres of small bumps at 30mph. Theoretically the damper looks great, but have you ridden SSV damped fork on trail? It gives your hands a bit of a beating when you start picking up speed. In contrast HSCV damped forks smooth out the trail very well at high speeds.

_MK
 
#15 ·
Besides the cheap stock SunTour fork, I haven't ridden another suspension fork on the trails. =p That sucker is just a pogo stick and the vibration gets so bad I can barely see where I'm going once I pick up speed on a bumpy trail.

I am reading this thread with interest because I'm about to make a decision on getting either the MX Comp ETA with SSV or the MX Pro ETA which has (better?) SSVF.

Sounds like you know your SSV's... but have you also actually ridden the SSVF to see the difference?

Thanks.


Phil.
 
#16 ·
From the looks of it the F seems to help exclusively on bigger hits, as Marzocchi says it covers up the compression circuits, limiting oil flow. Unless you like to go off drops, etc, I don' t think it is worth the money as the Pros are much more than Comps. My first "real" fork was a 2003 MX Comp, an upgrade from a Rock Shox Indy SL. It felt sooooooo good in contrast to what was on the bike before. Definatelly a fantastic fork for the money. If you can score a slightly used Marathon S for roughly the same price as you'll looking to buy the MX for, I would definatelly push you in that direction as the damping is far superior.

_MK
 
#17 ·
I see... I saw the Marathons for sale a while ago but they had too much travel for my hardtail. Think 105mm is about the max I can go on my bike.

Price wise, the difference between the Comp and Pro is going to be $50. I'm wanting to do bigger drops.. nothing crazy but maybe up to 3 feet or so. Looks like the Pro with the SSVF would be the way to go yes?

I just knocked down Jenson's price on the MX Pro ETA to $259.95 on price match... there is also a 10% off deal so I'll be getting the fork at $234 + tax/shipping. Not a bad deal for a $400 fork eh? =p

The only reason I haven't made the purchase is I wonder if I shouldn't buy a new bike more suited to my wanting to do more aggressive XC with some drops/jumps. I love my hardtail though... so I think with the fork upgrade, I'd only spend a couple hundred instead of couple thousand.. and I should be good to go for another year till it starts to itch again.. By then I can justify the purchase with improved skill level and such... =)


Phil.
 
#18 ·
Prexus2005 said:
I see... I saw the Marathons for sale a while ago but they had too much travel for my hardtail. Think 105mm is about the max I can go on my bike.

Price wise, the difference between the Comp and Pro is going to be $50. I'm wanting to do bigger drops.. nothing crazy but maybe up to 3 feet or so. Looks like the Pro with the SSVF would be the way to go yes?

I just knocked down Jenson's price on the MX Pro ETA to $259.95 on price match... there is also a 10% off deal so I'll be getting the fork at $234 + tax/shipping. Not a bad deal for a $400 fork eh? =p

The only reason I haven't made the purchase is I wonder if I shouldn't buy a new bike more suited to my wanting to do more aggressive XC with some drops/jumps. I love my hardtail though... so I think with the fork upgrade, I'd only spend a couple hundred instead of couple thousand.. and I should be good to go for another year till it starts to itch again.. By then I can justify the purchase with improved skill level and such... =)

Phil.
Sounds like you got it figured out pretty well. :)

At ~$250, you're in the used Fox Vanilla territory. That's one smokin fork at 4" extension. Better damped and stiffer than the MX. Still, MX is great, and Pro sounds like it will fit your style better.

_MK
 
#19 ·
Thanks for the input and feed back. =) Helped me confirm it's the right decision to make.

I just don't trust used stuff... then I'd worry about steer tube length.. if the fork's been abused... or whatever.

Think I'll drive up and pick up the fork from Jenson tomorrow. Will report back next week on my impressions of the fork. =)


Phil.
 
#20 ·
Prexus2005 said:
"The floating valve instantly lets oil flow through the first valve circuit with no resistance providing greater initial and small bump sensitivity."

Doesn't that mean it is in fact designed to absrobe high speed trail chatter??? :confused:

Phil.
Initial small bump sensitivity is different than "high speed" consecutive type hits. Note: The term "high speed" is not refering to the speed of your bike, but rather the speed in which your fork must move in order to react to chatter type bumps.
 
#21 ·
TPC and TPC+ is going to be much much smoother than SSVF. TPC+ also adds some progressitivity to the travel.

SSVF isn't too goof for DH because it can't take those rapid high speed chatters. What ends up happening is that it won't be able to respond, and will actually stop at a certain point in it's travel.

I noticed an immediate difference when switching between my super plush custom tuned TPC+ Sherman Firefly and the Marzocchi Dropoff Comp that came with my Coiler. No matter how I tune it, I just can't seem to get the same sort of feel I do with my Firefly. The Marzocchi is definitely a rougher ride. I noticed the same thing riding a Marzocchi z150 Dropoff in the Northwest. On several occasions the travel spiked up on me. But on the single big drops, it does alright.
 
#23 ·
MK_ said:
SSV dampers don't have any shims or anything fancy of the sort. There are just holes through which the oil flows. At higher speeds there isn't enough oil moving around for the fork to soak up the bumps.

_MK
That doesn't seem to be the case for the SSVF. The '05 manual says "in the SSVF system, the evolution of the SSV system, the fork's sensitivity is further improved, thanks to the spring-preloaded valve."

As far as I understand, a spring-loaded valve is a high-speed compression damper, which together with an orifice damper may form a damper that works well for all types of speeds. A shim stack is another type of high-speed compression damper.

Then why would the SSVF not be able to work well at all speeds?

Maybe someone needs to run the damper in a dyno bench, or ride it parallel to another fork that is identical except from the damper, to find out? Or are there general differences between spring-loaded valves, shim stacks, and other types of high-speed dampers?
 
#24 ·
anden said:
That doesn't seem to be the case for the SSVF. The '05 manual says "in the SSVF system, the evolution of the SSV system, the fork's sensitivity is further improved, thanks to the spring-preloaded valve."

As far as I understand, a spring-loaded valve is a high-speed compression damper, which together with an orifice damper may form a damper that works well for all types of speeds. A shim stack is another type of high-speed compression damper.

Then why would the SSVF not be able to work well at all speeds?

Maybe someone needs to run the damper in a dyno bench, or ride it parallel to another fork that is identical except from the damper, to find out? Or are there general differences between spring-loaded valves, shim stacks, and other types of high-speed dampers?
The only valve is the one that switches the direction of the oil from the rebound to the compression circut and back. That spring holds the valve, which is really only a washer looking thing, in a "no mans land" at low oil flow to improve low speed plushness. As oil flow or velocity picks up, the valve works just like the ssv. As oil flow gets greater, the oil backs up against the metering holes, creating a spike in the oil pressure. There is no pressure relief valve to bypass this oil. There is no need to dyno anything to feel this. I have the mx pro which will spike and I have spiked it. If you are going to ride at speed, don't expect the best ride possible.
 
#25 ·
1niceride said:
The only valve is the one that switches the direction of the oil from the rebound to the compression circut and back. That spring holds the valve, which is really only a washer looking thing, in a "no mans land" at low oil flow to improve low speed plushness. As oil flow or velocity picks up, the valve works just like the ssv. As oil flow gets greater, the oil backs up against the metering holes, creating a spike in the oil pressure. There is no pressure relief valve to bypass this oil. There is no need to dyno anything to feel this. I have the mx pro which will spike and I have spiked it. If you are going to ride at speed, don't expect the best ride possible.
Thanks for explaining. So that spring-loaded valve is not what I thought it is. I haven't tried the SSVF, and haven't seen any illustration of it.
 
#26 ·
Here's an email I got today from Marzocchi. He tells me the MX Comp and MX Pro are identical except the placement of rebound adjuster... I'm thinking he doesn't know much about the forks which is odd for a Marzocchi tech... hmmm


Dear Customer
in reply to your technical question:
Question before I buy the MX Pro ETA fork... Compared with the MX Comp
ETA, can you give me an idea how much better the Pro is with SSVF vs
Comp's SVF?

I plan to use it on my XC hardtail. Would the fork be ok if I
occasionally
drop off ledges or rocks up to 2-3 feet high? I plan to do more of
aggressive XC riding. I understand the All Mountain series might be
more
suitable.. but they have too much travel for my hardtail. =/

Would you suggest instead of buying the MX Pro or Comp ETA.. get a full
suspension bike more suitable for my desire for aggressive XC riding?
Or
think I'll be fine with the MX forks on my hardtail?

Thanks a million.

Philip
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
the reply is:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The two forks are exactly the same as far as structural integrity. The
only difference betweent the two is: MX Pro has external rebound; MX
Comp
has internal rebound adjust.
Your bike preference is obviosly up to you, but it would cost a lot
less
to get a MX Comp/Pro and not like it than to get a newer bike and not
like
that. The two bikes are for very different riding, and it is up to your
own personal likes to pick either or.

Best Regards,
Marzocchi Staff
661.257.6630