I'm after a new ride this summer and, having taken a hard look at my riding over the past 5 years, I had pretty much settled on one of the newer 700c based bikes (Trek DS, Giant Roam, etc) because, if I'm being honest, beyond semi daily commuting in summer, I have only on occasion ventured off the crusher-dust trails in our area.
Now that it comes down to it though, I'm getting cold feet about investing a grand or so in something which may restrict me from venturing into nature (rare as it may be).
Some thoughts/questions:
- This is going to sound trite, but how tough are the aforementioned 700c based bikes? Phrased a more practical way, how would they stack up to my 5 year old Giant Rincon (which while decidedly entry level, sure took a beating without greif)?
- What is the bottom line difference between 700c and 29er bikes? Are we basically talking about the width (ok, diameter to be picky) of the tire? Literature for the Trek DS points out the frame can accommodate either tire (though I assume a rim swap wold be in order)....so does that mean their DS is just a 29er with a narrower tire and less travel in the fork?
Now that it comes down to it though, I'm getting cold feet about investing a grand or so in something which may restrict me from venturing into nature (rare as it may be).
Some thoughts/questions:
- This is going to sound trite, but how tough are the aforementioned 700c based bikes? Phrased a more practical way, how would they stack up to my 5 year old Giant Rincon (which while decidedly entry level, sure took a beating without greif)?
- What is the bottom line difference between 700c and 29er bikes? Are we basically talking about the width (ok, diameter to be picky) of the tire? Literature for the Trek DS points out the frame can accommodate either tire (though I assume a rim swap wold be in order)....so does that mean their DS is just a 29er with a narrower tire and less travel in the fork?