Ok, I get the fact that not many people are going to want to buy this bike, but what I don't get is if Specialized is making them to sell in Europe, why can't they ship one for me to buy to a dealer in the U.S? It is a little frustrating to have to either choose the carbon frame expert or upgrade most of the parts on a comp. Reasons why I want the M5 frame over the carbon:
1) I've never ridden the sj ht carbon frame, but I know I love the M5 ht frame. There is just something about the way it rides that really appeals to me. I've ridden other carbon bikes that I like, but I can't be sure I would like the sj carbon ht frame as well as I like the M5.
2) The head angle on the M5 frame is one half degree slacker (70.5 vs. 71).
3) Even though I'm sure the carbon would probably hold up just fine, it seems from what I've read that there is at least a slightly higher possibility that crashing in the right way (probably at slow speed leaning into a sharp rock or root) would damage the carbon frame than that an alloy frame would be damaged in a crash. Also, Ive seen the underside of the down tube on carbon frames look pretty ugly after a season of deflecting small rocks that get thrown up.
4) The carbon frame is only a little bit lighter and a lot more expensive. I'd rather put the money into lighter wheels (I'd upgrade the wheels on either model) and put on a carbon seatpost to help with vibration damping. The M5 frame actually feels pretty amazing over rough stuff for an alloy hardtail.
But, I'd really like to have the lighter SID over the Fox fork, the x-9 shifters, and the better crank set that comes on the Expert level bike. I'm not sure I understand the economics behind making a U.S. company making a bike but refusing to sell it in their own country. Can anyone explain this? Even if I am the only person in the whole US that wants one (which I doubt), if they make it and I am willing to pay the shipping costs, why can't they sell me one?
1) I've never ridden the sj ht carbon frame, but I know I love the M5 ht frame. There is just something about the way it rides that really appeals to me. I've ridden other carbon bikes that I like, but I can't be sure I would like the sj carbon ht frame as well as I like the M5.
2) The head angle on the M5 frame is one half degree slacker (70.5 vs. 71).
3) Even though I'm sure the carbon would probably hold up just fine, it seems from what I've read that there is at least a slightly higher possibility that crashing in the right way (probably at slow speed leaning into a sharp rock or root) would damage the carbon frame than that an alloy frame would be damaged in a crash. Also, Ive seen the underside of the down tube on carbon frames look pretty ugly after a season of deflecting small rocks that get thrown up.
4) The carbon frame is only a little bit lighter and a lot more expensive. I'd rather put the money into lighter wheels (I'd upgrade the wheels on either model) and put on a carbon seatpost to help with vibration damping. The M5 frame actually feels pretty amazing over rough stuff for an alloy hardtail.
But, I'd really like to have the lighter SID over the Fox fork, the x-9 shifters, and the better crank set that comes on the Expert level bike. I'm not sure I understand the economics behind making a U.S. company making a bike but refusing to sell it in their own country. Can anyone explain this? Even if I am the only person in the whole US that wants one (which I doubt), if they make it and I am willing to pay the shipping costs, why can't they sell me one?