Joined
·
115 Posts
Lookig for a hardtail around $1500 for my first mtn bike in a long time...Which bikes out there can run both wheel sizes ?
We're only a few posts in, but you've already won the useless post award for the thread. Big congrats!If you can run 29 why on earth would you want to use B+?
Ok i know there's weird-birds that imagine some situation where being able to swap might be valuable. Identify all 6 where that's a feature, and ignore so many great hardtails that were designed for a specific ride character. Never mind that all the 'swappable' frames are going to be on the experience-restricting XC end of the spectrum.
This is all to say i think you're starting with the wrong question.![]()
Thank you. I'd like to thank the Academy, God, and tfinator for his ability to politely upstage me. Respect!We're only a few posts in, but you've already won the useless post award for the thread. Big congrats!
You know you are talking shite right? There are plenty frames that can run 27.5+ and 29 that are not XC end.If you can run 29 why on earth would you want to use B+?
Ok i know there's weird-birds that imagine some situation where being able to swap might be valuable. Identify all 6 where that's a feature, and ignore so many great hardtails that were designed for a specific ride character. Never mind that all the 'swappable' frames are going to be on the experience-restricting XC end of the spectrum.
This is all to say i think you're starting with the wrong question.![]()
Nope. Accommodating both wheel sizes seems sensible when you're buying a new bike and tires are a mystery, but basically nobody ever swaps back and forth in the real world. There's lots of options that accommodate both, but they tend to be more expensive because small scale production or a yolk is expensive to implement. This is vendors responding to market forces, not a feature for riders. A frame that was designed around a specific wheel size should be cheaper and have a more clearly defined use-case. Err... superior, in theory. Many of your suggestions bump against custom frame pricing, where the move to custom is obvious. A custom builder can work around the user's fit, handling, and geometry preferences.You know you are talking shite right?
I know several people local to me that swap back and forth between 27.5+ and 29 depending on conditions and the type of riding.Nope. Accommodating both wheel sizes seems sensible when you're buying a new bike and tires are a mystery, but basically nobody ever swaps back and forth in the real world. There's lots of options that accommodate both, but they tend to be more expensive because small scale production or a yolk is expensive to implement. This is vendors responding to market forces, not a feature for riders. A frame that was designed around a specific wheel size should be cheaper and have a more clearly defined use-case. Err... superior, in theory. Many of your suggestions bump against custom frame pricing, where the move to custom is obvious. A custom builder can work around the user's fit, handling, and geometry preferences.
You guys should keep compiling a list of versatile frames. That's interesting and useful. I thought i was stating the obvious and have minimal interest in the discussion. No opinion on the 29/27+ frames that are out there; i build my own frames so i have my own opinions on the details.
Ultimately this is all details and none of it matters. Which goes to my original point- you're ignoring a lot of good bikes if you only look at ones that can fit multiple wheel sizes.
I swap back and forth all the time. My FS and hardtail both accommodate 29" and 27.5+". 27.5+ for soft conditions, early/late season debris filled trails and rocky, loose terrain. I put the 29ers on for everything else.Nope. Accommodating both wheel sizes seems sensible when you're buying a new bike and tires are a mystery, but basically nobody ever swaps back and forth in the real world.