TALAS it's on the 36. Drop the travel by 3/4" and you'll have what you want.Tappoix said:i want more...bigger, stronger, lighter, better damping!!!
When will the Fox 36 technology make its way to a 5" fork design?
this year? next?
seems like a logical market to create.
yeah, but Turner doesn't like the idea of the 36 on a 5 Spot. Just a bit too much and tempting to go to big.smudge said:TALAS it's on the 36. Drop the travel by 3/4" and you'll have what you want.
when has that ever $topped us?The Squeaky Wheel said:I'd like to see Fox put that damper in the 32mm stanchion forks but then they'll be even pricier.
I'm not completely sure how long the bigger and bigger tubing will go. Marzocchi has kinda stuck with the 30mm for their XC forks. I think people expected them to make the just to a lightweight 32mm fork when fox had theirs out, but they haven't yet. I don't really consider the AMSL a XC or XC racing fork by any means. But, for all I know they may go to 32mm tubes for an 06 Marathon but I don't know...RaD said:I think you will see more forks with similar tubing diameters(35-36mm) pop of in the future from all manufactures.
It was the same as they switched from 28mm tubing to 30mm,than from 30 to 32mm and it seems to be logical that they will follow the leader.
Why should there be not a 36mm FLOAT or Vanilla?Also possible that you can buy a 36mm Sherman or Pike in future...?
Later
RaD
absolutely no problem with the Turner! are you crazy, man?rpet said:Tappoix - it sounds like you have a Turner problem, not a Fox 36 problem.
There are a lot of other forks out there man, if you're set on the 5-spot.
-r
The 36 falls right in with the Z1/All Mt chassis from Marzocchi. The A-to-C is almost exactly the same as a Z1 150mm (appox 535-540mm). So it's not as tall as the 66, but not as short as the other Foxes when set to the same travel.MK_ said:How tall is the 36? Travel alone doesn't paint the whole picture, take the 66 for example, it is taller than the 888. Z1 is an inch taller than the Vanilla, both 5" forks. This was a main reason I got the Vanilla at first before deciding that it wasn't enough fork to do the job and got the Z1. If you take a coil 36 (which will be out next year, as rumors have it) and set it to 5", will it be taller or shorter than the Z1?
_MK
I'm about 210 with gear and can tell you with conviction that the difference in stiffness between my 05 TALAS RLC and 36 is HUGE. There's really no comparison...especially through rutted out berms.Tappoix said:an interesting perspecitve, rpet. there are so many niches to think about.
i'm 235 w/ gear. oh joy. i can't tell you that i necessarily feel the flex, but i could imagine it being stiffer. especially pounding through rutted out berms.
Yup. There's no comparison. The 36 eats up everything in it's path. It's like a guided missle.smudge said:I'm about 210 with gear and can tell you with conviction that the difference in stiffness between my 05 TALAS RLC and 36 is HUGE. There's really no comparison...especially through rutted out berms.
so why can't they do that for a 5" fork?The Squeaky Wheel said:Yup. There's no comparison. The 36 eats up everything in it's path. It's like a guided missle.