No problem....
donalson said:
ken can you go into a bit more detail of the canit's vs V's... i've got a set of LX canti's with diacomp (SP?) leavers on a '95 speced bike out in the garage... even when comparing to the very low end tektro's on my redline 29er there is no comparison... step it up to the avid sd7 with sd7 leaver (rear stoppers on my monkey running mullet) there is no way i could think of a canti over them...
If you've read any of my other advice here, you'll notice a theme:
1. Fit is the most important determination in finding the "best" bike.
2. There are very few "best of show" components. Personal preference determines which pedals, seatpost, bars, shoes, shifters, brakes, etc. are "best".
When I made the comment on canti's, it really depends on where you ride, how you ride and what works best for you. The monumental advantage that canti's have over V-brakes is on clearance between the brake assembly and the tire and rim.
If you ride in an area where the trails are perpetually muddy, you should really be running discs. But of price is an issue, then you will more than likely obtain better performance from canti's over V's. Canti's will clear more mud and will be less prone to clogging up and stopping your bike from moving.
Comparing a canti from 1995 to a modern day V-brake isn't a very fair comparison. My high end 1995 60mm Rock Shox with coil, oil and rubber dampeners doesn't perform nearly as well as my 125 mm Marzocchi Marathon Air Fork. I suspect it doesn't perform nearly as well as a low end Tora, although I've never ridden one.
Modern canti's are pretty powerful. They're used in cyclo-cross from pro racers all the way down to regional competitors. Because there are sponsorship $, world rankins, etc. hinging on cyclo-cross, it means there's technology (money) being applied at some level to canti's.