Wow, I just looked at my SID and it looks like your friend was right.jrsbike said:I have a chance to pick up a 2010 100 mm SID at a great price. This would go on my Intense XVP. I weigh 190 and was told that I am too fat for a SID and should stick to a Reba or a FOX. Is this right?
That is too funny. I rode my old SID while weighing anywhere from 190-210. I never thought about being "too fat" until I upgraded my fork. After doing so, and feeling the difference, I was scared at what might have been.trailville said:Wow, I just looked at my SID and it looks like your friend was right.
There are plenty of heavier riders riding lightweight forks like Sids and R7s. A lot depends on how you ride though. If you ride aggressively and tend to just plow through stuff rather than being a finesse rider, it may not be right for you.
I only weigh 165, but I do have both a Sid and a Reba, and my personal recommendation (not because of your weight) would be to get the Reba unless you're a serious WW. A Reba is only a few ounces heavier and is a little easier to perform maintenance and doesn't require as frequent maintenance because it holds more oil in the lowers.
The new Sids (since 2009) are stiffer than the old ones though. I don't think you would get that same feel from a new Sid. The new Sids are really just slightly lighter versions of the Reba.vessel said:That is too funny. I rode my old SID while weighing anywhere from 190-210. I never thought about being "too fat" until I upgraded my fork. After doing so, and feeling the difference, I was scared at what might have been.