Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 39 Posts

· |i|
Joined
·
353 Posts
Nicest Racer-x I've seen. Awesome score with the KingTi.

Why no Moots stem though. Great job, nonetheless..
 

· (aka SS_MB-7)
Joined
·
923 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
robotkiller said:
Nicest Racer-x I've seen. Awesome score with the KingTi.

Why no Moots stem though. Great job, nonetheless..
There maybe a Moots in the future. I'm going to try some different stem lengths and rises to see which I like best. Then, a (custom, if req'd) Moots Ti-Beam! ;)
 

· (aka SS_MB-7)
Joined
·
923 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
As for the grips (ODI Lock-ons) and pedals (959s), these are not open for options...well, maybe ;)

I've done the super light cork grip, foam, etc., and I just found them to wear way too quickly and they became slick-as-snot on the bar when wet. Having tip-toed my way down a DH section with loose grips, I'm not about to remove my lock-ons for something lighter. With ODIs, lock and forget! Plus, I love the Ruffian grip texture...so sticky!

Pedals...I've used tons. Older Shimanos (535s, 525s, 747s), ATACs (Carbon, Titan), BeBops (absolutely the worst pedal yet), Eggs, etc. I've found that for my riding-style, terrain, etc., that the 959s have proven to be the most reliable, consistent, solid and durable pedal yet. Always in-out.

I'd like to try the newer-style ATACs, but I didn't like how the cleats wore grooves in the base of my carbon-soled shoes....I'm nearly completely through on my Shimano 220 shoes (shoes are still fine, sole is finished). It seems that Time was addressed a couple of the issues I had with the ATACs (too much lateral float), but I'm curious if they are using better bearings. On all the ATACs I've used (4-pairs), all had pre-mature bearing slop issues. My 3-yr old 959s are still rolling smoothly!

I did like my Eggs, but I did have some serious issues with them. First, I busted 2 cleats right through -- not fun! Second, I busted a set of the pedals (outboard bearing failed resulting in the pedal body separating from the spindle) during a pre-ride for a race. Third, cleats wear way too fast. Fourth, bearings/bushings wear way too fast. I still have my 1st generation Eggs (which have been warrantied a couple times due to the above), but I only use them during 'cross season when things get really nasty: mud, snow, leaves, etc. This is the only time the 959s will gum-up.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
236 Posts
Nice bike Mike !

THAT is the way a bike should be built to withstand everything for years. It's the best component choices I've seen. How does the frame ride ? Does it bob a little when pedaling out-of-the-saddle ?

Enjoy your bike !

Jean-Sébastien
 

· Registered
Joined
·
138 Posts
Very nice bike indeed.....

As usual Mike your bike is tricked out yet not WW obsessed... Nice work.

Now go tell your non biking buddies how much you spent on it.... :D

Jag
 

· (aka SS_MB-7)
Joined
·
923 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Thanks! Durability and reliability were my #1 concern. This bike will be raced during the TransRockies and I cannot afford problems. I've done the stupid-light thing, and while it has it place, I didn't feel the need to try it here.

I just finished it late last night and snapped these pics this morning before work. So, I haven't ridden it yet :( Weather forecast is for severe T-storms today, tomorrow and Thursday...just perfect :(
 

· try driving your car less
Joined
·
3,096 Posts
1speed_Mike said:
Thanks! Durability and reliability were my #1 concern. This bike will be raced during the TransRockies and I cannot afford problems. I've done the stupid-light thing, and while it has it place, I didn't feel the need to try it here.

I just finished it late last night and snapped these pics this morning before work. So, I haven't ridden it yet :( Weather forecast is for severe T-storms today, tomorrow and Thursday...just perfect :(
wow. super nice! you *might* consider running full cable housing for the rear derailluer for Transrockies in case of alot of mud. But I am sure you have done your homework and that thing will be super dialed in.

I am surprised you didnt get the seven duo-lux. is it heavier or something? cost? design? just curious. again, it looks super.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
125 Posts
Nice Job Mike! And very classy looking!

Remember, the best build is not the lightest... but the one you like best!!!! And you've tricked it out with all the stuff you love and know works. Purrrrfect!!!!

Way to go!

CODDERS
 

· (aka SS_MB-7)
Joined
·
923 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
jh_on_the_cape said:
I am surprised you didnt get the seven duo-lux. is it heavier or something? cost? design? just curious. again, it looks super.
I considered the Duo (Lux), but opted against it. I love Seven's frames (obviously) and the guys at Seven are fantastic, but there are just some things I don't like about the design.

One, the rear proprietary shock. I can just imagine if Fox decides to stop making the shock...it's happened before. Plus, since I'm in Canada, getting replacement parts is always a pain so I thought I'd go with something a little more common. Two, the really slack seat tube. Slight saddle-height changes make big differences in the overall cockpit length. I never discussed this with Seven, so this could have been factored-in.

But, I've always liked the RX. It's a tried-n-true design that has proven itself time and time again. I considered a couple other high-end FS-XC frames (SC Blur, Intense Spider, Turner Burner, etc.) but the RX always won out.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,851 Posts
Very, very, very nice! Did you custom specify the frame to be disc specific? I wish my Switchblade were made disc specific to avoid having to use cable guides and get rid of the stud mounts. We seem to agree on the ruffian grips, you can't make me take them off my bike either. My 959's are going on three years and are still running good as new with performance second to none. They are indestructible!
Whats with the odd spacer, stem, bar arrangement though? Wouldn't it look cleaner (and save some weight :)) to cut the steerer and flip the stem up?
 

· (aka SS_MB-7)
Joined
·
923 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
Hecubus said:
Very, very, very nice! Did you custom specify the frame to be disc specific? I wish my Switchblade were made disc specific to avoid having to use cable guides and get rid of the stud mounts. We seem to agree on the ruffian grips, you can't make me take them off my bike either. My 959's are going on three years and are still running good as new with performance second to none. They are indestructible!
Whats with the odd spacer, stem, bar arrangement though? Wouldn't it look cleaner (and save some weight :)) to cut the steerer and flip the stem up?
Yes, the frame and rear triangle were ordered as disc-specific.

As for the stem and spacers, I'm going to be trying different rises, reaches and spacers to get right fit. At this point, I wanted to keep the Fox's steerer tube as long as possible to allow for lots of different tests. Once I settle on a position, I'll remove the excess steerer tube.
 

· nightriding is fun !
Joined
·
457 Posts
Magnificent bike. Where did you get that CK Ti headset? I've been waiting for one since last September. Last I heard from CK they are finally starting to fill in the backorders (which means they are finally making a batch of them )
 

· Registered
Joined
·
209 Posts
The first generation Eggbeater was a DUD, you shouldn't judge Crank Brother's pedals by that model. Give the Candys a shot, they have a very similar feel to Time ATACs. The Ti models weigh 250 grams and would look sharp on your bike. The cleat still wears out quickly, but my two pairs of pedals look brand new after a year of use. I've had much less wear on the bars than with ATACs. Also, the axle on the Candy has very good protection, no slop so far.

By the way, that bike looks great. I have a 2000 Specialized FSR that also weighs 25 pounds, how about a trade. ;)
 
1 - 20 of 39 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top