gunsworth said:
Um, you shouldnt need to force a post to go in to begin with, if so the frame needs to be reamed so that it goes in nicely. Thus the clear coat stays on like it should and grease is not needed, it is never a good idea to put grease on carbon anyways...
That would be great and all in an ideal world. Unfortunately a good portion of frames do not come with the seat tube reamed at all or the tubing isn't even sized just right. Sometimes the posts aren't right on spec either. Its nearly impossible to dry insert carbon posts in without damage on many frames. A light film of grease will not do absolutely any harm to the post. Most manufacturers recomend grease if it can protect the surface from scraping off. In carbon to aluminium interface its especially important to have an insulator in between the two. If any of the protective coating on the carbon is stripped of and there is carbon on aluminium contact the result is the carbon acts as an accelerant causing galvanic errosion. Even though the post won't corrode the inside of the seat tube is stil Al and it can corrode. Given enough time it can even damage the tube. Theres nothing more fun than removing a totally seized carbon post with a wrench after the bonding from the head clamp brakes off due to the sheer amount of force needed to twist it around to release it. Many of the early carbon tube/aluminum lug frames built failed catastrophically because of this.
Heh, did a quick google search on the subject and found quite a bit of info on the subject. This was a pretty interesting (the F-16 part) comment by some engineer:
"Carbon Fiber does indeed attack aluminum
VORACIOUSLY if any hint of moisture gets into
the matrix. All the metal parts on the F-16 fighter that
contact CF are Stainless Steel, Passivated too if I am not
mistaken to more closely match the electronegativity value of the
two materials."