Thanks for the feedback GT.
Yeah, I ran that ad for a day and a half, and then realized I was being way to premature. I really feel like I owe it to myself (and to the Fargo) to give it a go. I am very familiar with the high-front center tall head tube style of frame, and really want the purpose-built drop-bar oriented geometry. The Fargo delivers nicely on that front so that was never an issue for me. The construction and materials in the frame and fork are also top-notch, so I am happy with that too. Probably my biggest misgiving with the frameset is feeling guilty that I am not using it for what it was primarily designed for.The first thing that ran through my head was wondering where I can find some lightweight aluminum or plastic bolts to plug all of the braze-on holes with. I never use water bottles anymore and won't ever use a rack on the bike so the extra braze-ons are added weight and entry points for water and muck.
Then I started thinking about how much lighter the bike would be with a different rigid fork that wasn't built for touring with all of the braze-ons. This is what drives me to the point of questioning my choice in buying the Fargo in the first place.

Its not the geometry of the frame at all, its really the inescapable fact thats its more utility oriented and heavier than I would like it to be. I looked hard at the Gryphon too, but its no lighter and although its a nice frame/fork I just could not bring myself to buy a frame with an EBB that I would never use. Short of having a custom frame built for me, the Fargo was the best choice. I realize that the Fargo is never going to be a "lightweight" bike, and I just need to quit thinking about it now that its built, and get some riding in. As long as it handles like I hope it will it should be a great little bike.