I think Woody and Trail Dynamics did that. You can thank 'em directly.
I blame Global Warming and Walmart. And I'm always thinking of the trails.driftwood said:I don't get it. Who are you blaming? The trail contractor who did the work? The Forest Service for having the work done? The cyclists who have still been riding in Bent Creek even though it is damp out? Eddie and other dogs for using a trail that should be left to rest? I'm having a hard time keeping up with all the outrage anymore.
Can't anyone think of the trails?
I agree, but I do wonder for how long they remain sensitive? I mean wasn't the trail in question worked a year or so ago? Many of the BC trails that have been "fixed" in recent years are the ones in the worst condition when any moisture comes along. Much worse than they would fare prior to the work. Look at Wolf Branch, for example. Or the trail this thread is about. They are now in the worst condition they have ever been in. FWIW, I did not ride the powerline trail. It OBVIOUSLY didn't want me there. It was a quick and easy decision to go elsewhere. I didn't need anyone telling me not to. I want a cookie.Maida7 said:Newly worked trails are much more sensitive.
It depends on several factors. Soil, weather, design, traffic, exposure, etc... That trail was all dug up last fall. Perhaps by the end of this summer it will be what they intended it to be.mbmb65 said:I agree, but I do wonder for how long they remain sensitive? I mean wasn't the trail in question worked a year or so ago? Many of the BC trails that have been "fixed" in recent years are the ones in the worst condition when any moisture comes along. Much worse than they would fare prior to the work. Look at Wolf Branch, for example. Or the trail this thread is about. They are now in the worst condition they have ever been in. FWIW, I did not ride the powerline trail. It OBVIOUSLY didn't want me there. It was a quick and easy decision to go elsewhere. I didn't need anyone telling me not to. I want a cookie.
Indeed!driftwood said:I don't get it. Who are you blaming? The trail contractor who did the work? The Forest Service for having the work done? The cyclists who have still been riding in Bent Creek even though it is damp out? Eddie and other dogs for using a trail that should be left to rest? I'm having a hard time keeping up with all the outrage anymore.
Can't anyone think of the trails?
Rangers have been writing citations to morons who feel it is ok to park wherever they see fit, even if it's in the MIDDLE OF THE FREAKIN' ROAD! It's been happening alot lately and the FS is responding. 'Bout time. Just don't park in the road and you'll be fine.litespeedchick said:"Getting back people and cars where everywhere along with a ranger righting tickets to people who cant read or are unwilling to park at any other location."
I can't understand what that sentence is trying to convey. Can someone explain anything I might need to know regarding closings, tickets, etc? thanks.
No, we don't. Please don't mention it again. Trails in Brevard are not closed "to protect them". They are closed in an attempt to curb user conflict. Enough of this non-sense!450VoltsDC said:Indeed!
Lower Sidehill shares a similar fate. We need seasonal closings, as done in Brevard Pisgah, on the lower trails to protect them.
"We have met the enemy and he is us." -Pogo
Truthinessmaida7 said:I wish cruso414 would go away(as do many).