Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 40 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,183 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I'm in the market for a used truck. They are both 6 cyl. but is there a big difference in gas mileage between 6 cyl and 8 cyl?? Which one would you choose between the two? I'm thinking access cab and jacking up the suspension.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,148 Posts
Ford vs. Chevy. lol

As someone who has owned both, I can say I would go with neither. Only because the full size trucks get almost as good gas mileage and can haul more/are more comfortable.

If you are set on one of those, I would say a Frontier, hands down, is the better truck now. If used, look at 2004 and older Tacomas, and they're solid as a rock. My 2006 Tacoma is the worst vehicle I have ever owned. Toyota seems to have stopped caring about quality control when they changed to the newer body style in 2005. My buddy had a 2005 and 2007 Tacoma as well, and hated both of them due to reliability issues and cheap interior. (This is why I hated mine) Our 2004 Frontier is one of the best we have ever owned.

But again, no real advantage to buying a mid sized truck any more with the new higher mpg V8s in the big trucks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
I had an 06 xterra and a toyota 4 runner basically the same thing and i loved the xterra it was the best suv i have ever owned the 4runner was crap compared to the xterra i would get a fronteir over a taco.My xterra perfomed offroad with 33 inch nitto terra grapplers better than the 4 runner with same tires on road it was a little stiffer due to leafs in the rear compared to coils in the 4runner i think the taco has leafs though definatley would by nissan again
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,217 Posts
To each their own. Individual issues, or small samplings, should not make a decision. Look at overall history. Sure, I like the older Taco's better than the newer ones. And yes, the Tacoma could get better mileage. Also, I didnt like the Frontier, exterior or interior, as much as the Tacoma. Although I am not impressed with the cloth for the seats in the Tacoma either.

The actual reliability of the two are about equal. With the V6, both are pretty close in MPG. I get a bit better than 21 in mine, significantly better than the 16 I got in my F150. Same roads, same drive every day to work, etc.

If you need to haul things, there are a lot of benefits to a full size with a small v8 or a good v6. I need the truck for smaller projects, towing things like motorcycle/lawn trailers, and hauling bikes and dogs around. I did not need a full size truck, and to some the 2-3mpg difference is not much. I drive about 25000 miles a year. the difference in my old truck to newer truck are about 375 gallons of gas, per year. At $3.50 per gallon, thats $1300 bucks. Or, 3 truck payments (if you finance). Or a new bike in 2-3 years. For someone driving 10k miles per year, the difference is much less of an issue.

Basically, consider your actual needs, costs, etc. and get the one that works best for you. I dont think you will go wrong with either.
 

·
I Have Cookies
Joined
·
2,644 Posts
If you are looking @ room (Access Cab= extra cab) Which you probably are not the Tacoma has more room. as for power the Fronter has more. I have owned a '05 Tacoma and now own a '10 Tacoma and love them both! I have had only one problem with either and that was on my '10 the rear bumper on delivery had some staining and was addressed immediately by Toyota. If you go Access cab I'd go with the 2.7l 4 cyl personally because it gets great mileage (stock) I don't know how it would fair wit a lift and larger tires. My '05 was equipped that way and I replaced the stock 245's (tires) with 265/75 16 tires and probably lost about 3mpg right off the bat. Just my $.02
 

·
big toys for big boys
Joined
·
14 Posts
just picked up an 04 tacoma myself....so far i love it. did a bunch of mechanical work (belts, pump, clutch) but if taken care of, these trucks will go 300,000+ and they are tough. google top gear toyota hilux, you'll see what i mean

if you don't need a lot of extra room, the access cab is great. the only downside is there are only two doors, so bigger items may be harder to put in the back. i've sat in the back of mine just for grins, and i wouldn't want to ride that far in it, unless i was laying across the whole back, but even then it wouldn't be ideal.

its hard to get a feel for what to do, but every guy i know who owns/owned a yota absolutely loved it and had nothing bad to complain about.

good luck!!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
46 Posts
I've got an 05 Tacoma double cab short bed v6 4x4 trd sport. I've only had it for a year but i love this truck. I get 21+ mpgs unless i beat on it. Best I have done on a tank was 24.7 mpgs. I had intentions of modding/upgrading the truck so i picked the tacoma as there is a lot of aftermarket options for these trucks. I'm pretty sure theres more than for the frontier as far as i know.

Im lifted 3" right now, still on stock tires though (running them til they wear out), but even with these tires this truck is quite good offroad.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
To tell you the truth I've owned both v6 and v8 trucks. There isn't really that much of a diffrence except for a mile or two without driving like a nanny. v8 trucks do really well when compared to a small truck. The milage may be a bit different but the room a full size truck gives can't be compared. The Nissan in the video seems to be a bit better all around while the Tacoma does better off road. But most of us do our off roading on our bikes so unless you got beaches and going up and down dunes or trails the I'd think the Frontier would be the better buy. Its best in the end though to test drive both and choose that way instead of reading peoples reviews or opinions. Let us know what you get.

*Can't post links yet apparently cause I'm to much of a noob but just google: Frontier vs. Tacoma and check out the youtube video from edmunds. They are a trusted source.:madman:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,056 Posts
I've had a '96 Tacoma and never had any problems, even after severaly abusing it. Had a Toyota X-Runner and never had any issues (after having the stock tranny replaced under warrenty). Have an FJ Cruiser with 100k miles on it now and have had ZERO problems. I don't know much about the Frontiers, other than a co-worker who had one with the stock supercharger and he had the s'charger replaced 3 times before bailing on it and getting something else. I wouldn't even consider a Ranger. Nothing personal I suppose, just never liked them. I did know a guy years ago who had one and he beat the heck out of it and it always seemed to get him where he was going...
 

·
Tossin the salad.
Joined
·
737 Posts
I personally go for the Taco!

I used to own a 2004 4x4 QC Frontier. I did lift it and toyed with it, but the accessories / options that can be put on a Taco is much more easier to find. Overall back then; I wish I got the Taco instead! It's just a better truck overall.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
88 Posts
my buddy has a frontier and we make him drive to all our riding destinations. Its a comfy truck when it has the leather and full 4 doors and can haul a bunch of bikes. His truck for instance has 2 racks on the roof rack, 3 fork mount racks in the truck bed, and a thule 4 bike hitch carrier. More bikes than people can fit in the car but it could happen if we wanted.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
617 Posts
I test drove both a few years back and decided on a 4-door Frontier. It had better acceleration and braking. The ride however was a bit harder than the Taco.

The Frontier was also easier to get in and out vs. knocking my knee in the Taco. Lastly, the Frontier came with more features for the price.

My 2006 Frontier crew cab, 6spd manual, 2wd gets 21mpg city, ~25mpg highway. Average overall 23.5 mpg.

Both are great trucks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,000 Posts
Current Taco's are too small to be used as a full sized truck, and too big for daily driving, but that's just me- I don't get the "mid-sized" truck thing. I had a 99 Taco, and it was the most reliable vehicle I've ever owned, and I just got rid of an 09 Taco, and it was among the worst. Lots of recalls, new transmission at 8,000 miles, crappy mileage. Sad that Toyota has gone luxo with their trucks and forgot about those of us who really want a rough and tumble vehicle. As others have said, you are better off with a full sized big three- more power for towing, more room for stuff, and the mileage is virtually identical. As far as Toyota vs. Nissan, for some reason Tacos hold their value much better, so a similar Frontier should be better priced.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
404 Posts
I have a 2010 Tacoma TRD that i traded a 2005 Frontier in for about 2 yrs ago.

I give the nod to the Frontier for the motor and the rail system in the bed, but i like the taco better overall. It is a little bigger, has a better quality interior, and the stereo is way better. I have had no problems with it at all so far (45K miles). I like the way it looks better too.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
I said Tacoma before, and I still think that! I just wanted to add that either should be a good pick for you. Just please don't look at Dodge Dakotas. I had an 03 for 4 years and it was the absolute worst vehicle that I've ever owned. Two thumbs down.

I knew that they were going to stop building the Frontier's older brother, Titan, so I just googled it. Came back w/ tons of information about Dodge building Titans for Nissan. Nissan will still build the Frontier, but still.

I'm sure the Frontier is a great truck, I'm just a Tacoma man. :)
 
1 - 20 of 40 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top