Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
461 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
For hard packed trails, which makes more sense, Marge Lites or Rabbit Hole 29er? ML would offer more cush, RH would be faster rolling.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

·
This place needs an enema
Joined
·
15,773 Posts
For hard packed trails, which makes more sense, Marge Lites or Rabbit Hole 29er? ML would offer more cush, RH would be faster rolling.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
For hardpacked trails, a mountain bike makes more sense. Faster, cheaper, lighter.

But if you've got a compelling reason to ride fat on hardpack (and many do), then RH's are the ticket.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
401 Posts
29+ I went with Nextie 29x35 carbon rims but Rabbit Holes are sweet too!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
461 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
I don't know what compels me to ride this bike on hardpack...I've got plenty of mtn bikes (light, fast, but not cheap). The carbon Beargrease is the best handling fat bike I've ridden--so maybe that's it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
I couldn't agree more. I line in rock and technical terrain territory and my BG carbon is the best handling bike ever. I just smile when I ride it. I'm rocking HEDs for all season. Just vee8s for hard pack
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top