Joined
·
4,800 Posts
Same in kind, different in scope.Where is “here”?
There is the same exact situation in every west coast riding destination I’ve visited, even places with excellent legal trails like the PNW.
Same in kind, different in scope.Where is “here”?
There is the same exact situation in every west coast riding destination I’ve visited, even places with excellent legal trails like the PNW.
-See Fort Ord in Monterey County for a prime example of this happening....Don't twist my words. This is a statement about land managers resistance to recognize the changing demands of recreation. Trails once rogue and outside of the land managers build specs can and have been adopted.
This is very true and happening on some state owned land down here. California Fish n Wildlife was reported to have ticketed a MTB rider just a few days ago.^^ It's extremely hard to get that done in a state park, although the park managers in Santa Cruz County have been really good about looking the other way.
Now this is gold.1. If your friends use Strava for mountain biking, there is literally no reason to have the Heatmap enabled. Show them how to disable it.
2. Don't promote locations or names of unsanctioned trails on the Internet in any form, unless you're the builder and you DGAF.
3. Encourage your friends who ride to never be Generation 3 trail users:
View attachment 1911037
He's not saying DON'T RECORD, he's suggesting NOT SHARING the data to the public heatmap. As an old nerd, you should recognize the difference. Maybe you're just more old than nerd nowadays. Your solution of "if you don't build it, they won't come" is unhelpful and counterproductive. You ever been to a parks meeting? They're so busy arguing over what to name this or that grove and if it's racist or not, or if feral cats should be killed to save the birds, that they could give two sh**ts about MTB trails. They don't care, and nothing progressive or interesting is getting built waiting for their permission.I'm not sad. I frankly don't GAF. I know the land managers are astute enough that they learn quick where that stuff is. If they have the resources (which includes the manpower) then they can do something about it if they want. Where I live, they do, sometimes. I know a couple guys who got arrested for building where they shouldn't. I definitely don't see a gray area.
If you build it, people will find it. And they don't have to be people that have been shown said trails by someone "in the know" or to have heard about them by word-of-mouth. People who are observant can find them just by noticing the trail when they pass by it. Some people are dorks who like staring at satellite imagery, and in the right environment, a trail will show up bright as day.
If you want to restrict access to something to keep traffic down, the only way you can do that is to build somewhere that you can control access. You can't do that on public land. You can't do that on someone else's private land where you lack permission to put the trails there (and therefore have an access agreement with the landowner).
Some of the local Facebook groups are somewhat popular, but I'd say that most riders aren't on those, either. I use them mostly so I can keep up on trail conditions. The only other local bike group on FB that's worth anything is the bike market one. I know a few people that restrict their social media use to Strava only, even. Frankly, the only way to keep people from recording a trail on Strava is to keep them off of it. Given the difficulty of doing that, the next best thing is not building it in the first place.
Yeah, I have...and y'all in Norcal really do live in a different country. A lot of what happens out there works VERY differently in other places.He's not saying DON'T RECORD, he's suggesting NOT SHARING the data to the public heatmap. As an old nerd, you should recognize the difference. Maybe you're just more old than nerd nowadays. Your solution of "if you don't build it, they won't come" is unhelpful and counterproductive. You ever been to a parks meeting? They're so busy arguing over what to name this or that grove and if it's racist or not, or if feral cats should be killed to save the birds, that they could give two sh**ts about MTB trails. They don't care, and nothing progressive or interesting is getting built waiting for their permission.
Nope. We just live in a progressive state. The rest of y'all eventually catch up.Yeah, I have...and y'all in Norcal really do live in a different country.
You should leave the cars that look like mtb vehicles a nice polite noteI hear you on this, seems that many of the "secret" trails in my area (El Dorado Hills) are now becoming more everyday trails with many people parking in the neighborhood (posted everywhere," No Trespassing") that has not been too open to outsiders at all. Guess it won't be long until the hurricane fences also go around there too. With that said, I have been considering to do away with using Strava as several longtime riders (20+ years) have done. When asked they seemed to want to get rid of the ball and chain and get back to just enjoying riding. I think I might try it out without Strava for a month or so, except that would create a gap in tracking my yearly goals, oh well, at least I am considering it. And for the rest of you, TURN OFF your damn Heatmaps!!
I was just wondering about this with my garmin watch. Thanks for sharing.Got me wondering if Garmin does a similar default setting — which it does.
Not sure if Garmin data is mined as much as Strava, but might as well disable it.
View attachment 1911496